Nobody downloaded yet

EU Law Studies - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The following is the advice for Klaus, Astrid, Heinrich, and Sophie with regards to their status as German nationals living in Spain within the boundaries of EU law relating to the free movement of persons as stated in Article 39EC.1
Klaus, as a car mechanic, when he first came to Spain, only managed to find temporary work for three months at a garage selling petrol…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.4% of users find it useful
EU Law Case Studies
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "EU Law Studies"

Download file to see previous pages Astrid, Klaus's wife, had every right to apply for a job as an estate agent. The fact that Astrid was discriminated against because she did not pass a Spanish language test in Spain-although she had completed and passed a similar test in Germany-is illegal because member EU states must treat other EU member citizens equally.4
The fact that Klaus did not receive the same company pension entitlement as Spanish nationals who also worked as his company is a blatant form of discrimination against Klaus as a German national living in Spain, again because EU members are supposed to receive the same social benefits of domestic members.5 Another social benefit6 Klaus should have received based on the fact that he is an EU members was his five extra holidays, just as his Spanish national counterparts.7
Similarly, in Astrid's case, she was discriminated against by not being able to receive the same social advantage8 of receiving free banking as her Spanish national counterparts who worked at the bank as well.
Sophie was discriminated against on the basis of nationality9 due to the fact that, at college, only students in her course who had lived in Spain for at least ten years could claim a special financial payment to cover the enrollment fee. This is because Sophie had only been in Spain for a few months. Still, however, this was a discriminatory practice.
Additionally, since Heinrich wanted to apply for a student maintenance grant but was told that it was only available to Spanish nationals, this is another form of discrimination based on nationality.10
Klaus and Heinrich, respectively-had prior convictions in Germany for handling stolen motor vehicles and dealing illegal drugs-can argue that they were trying to start a new life in Spain but were discriminated against in their pursuits of operating legally in the country of Spain. Klaus could not receive social security benefits or the same company pension as the other workers at his job who were Spanish nationals.
Heinrich needed a grant to go to school. Based on these exclusion from receiving the proper compensation and remuneration, which is a legal right of EU member citizens,11 it could be argued in court that Klaus reverted to an illegal venture in order to make ends meet.
Similarly, the same argument could be made of Astrid-that she was forced into a bank job by virtue of discrimination12 as a German national and was forced to resort to illegal methods to help ensure her family's well-being in Spain. Freedom of establishment13 in another member EU country is a right guaranteed to individuals who are EU citizens. In court, it could be argued that Klaus and Astrid were denied this basic right.14
Regarding Heinrich, it could be argued in court that-because he was not allowed to get a grant based on discrimination due to him being a German national15 while residing in Spain-Heinrich turned to dealing illegal drugs as an activity to pay for his schooling, which would not have been an issue had he not been discriminated against.16
With regard to Sophie, the political group which she had joined was under surveillance by authorities in Spain, however she was not committing an illegal act ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“EU Law Case Studies Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
EU Law Case Studies Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. Retrieved from
(EU Law Case Studies Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
EU Law Case Studies Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words.
“EU Law Case Studies Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


EU law

...?EU law Introduction Article 189 of Treaty of Rome provides for a directive of the European Union to be binding on Member s with flexibility have their legal text of their transposition according to their national peculiarities. In other words it can be so worded so as to be compatible with their national legislation. The aim of a directive is achieve the substance rather than the form. Thus, Member States are free to achieve the end-result required by a directive in suitably incorporating in their national laws.1 Case discussion with relevant legal principles Although the employer has allowed rest period 10 minutes as permitted in Estate Facilitators Act 1965 as against...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

EU Law

...prohibiting fur farming and restricting the entry of fur products in its territory is indeed a hindrance to competition. It is clear that its intention is to impede, prevent or reduce patronage of products source from other Member States which is contrary to the EU’s objective of a single and integrated market. This would promote locally produce products giving it undue economic advantage. Thus, the act of Sagoland falls within the prohibition of Article 34 TFEU. II. Measures of another Member State to protect the health and life of the animals found in the other Member State cannot be justified under Article 36 TFEU. National law of Sagoland intended to protect the life and health of animals found...
20 Pages(5000 words)Essay

EU law vent his views. In Pubblico Ministero v Ratti,10 it was held that A national law cannot be adapted even if it is provided with penal provisions as there was no compliance by the member state, and hence it could not be enforced11 However, in this case, UK already implemented the EU’s directive as regards to labelling. Hence , application of the UK law cannot be ruled out. Even after warning by the UK officials , If Blokkia AB dealer found selling mobile phones to children under the age of 10 ,then UK officials have every right to initiate action against him under The (fictitious) “Prohibition on Sale of Mobile Phones Act 2010 “as stated in the GPSD. PART B There may be...
11 Pages(2750 words)Assignment

EU law

..., Nergelius, J & Cardner, C, 2007, General Principles Of EC Law In A Process Of Development: Reports From A Conference In Stockholm, 23-24 March 2007, Organized By The Swedish Network For European Legal Studies, Kluwer Law International, Brussels. Berry, E & Hargreaves, S, 2009, European Union Law, Oxford university press, oxford. Chalmers, D, Davies, G & Monti, G, 2010, European Union Law: Cases And Materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Craig, P & de Burca, G, 2007, EU Law: Text, Cases, Materials, oxford university press, oxford. Hartley, T, 2007, The Foundations Of European...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


...the union has a directive on the right of the citizens of the union to move freely within the member states, Antoine has full right to exercise his right to be employed by the restaurant in London. All these parties after their rights have been infringed by the decision of the national authority as for Claude and Marie, and by fellow citizens as for Antoine, they have to seek redress first by appealing through the means provided by its national legislation. The EU law on free movement of workers can be invoked in national proceedings before the national authorities and courts. In a related scenario, Case C-434/09 McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ms McCarthy, a...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

EU Law

...of success in a claim against the government agency for a student grant on the basis of his residency, if he has been studying at the institution for at least three months and has no previous claim for social assistance from the government. Bibliography Textbooks Kennedy, T.P. European Law. (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2011, 5th Edn.). Journal Articles Inanilir, O. ‘Derogation from the Fee Movement of Goods in the EU: Article 30 and “Casis” Mandatory Requirements Doctrine,’ (2008)2 Ankara Bar Review, 106-113. Mayr, S. ‘Putting a Leash on the Court of Justice? Preconceptions in National Methodology v Effet Utile as a Meta-Rule.’ (Autumn/Winter 2012) 5(2) European Journal of Legal...
3 Pages(750 words)Coursework

International Business Law: Case Studies

...subsidiary company Junior Ltd. Entered into a cartel agreement to maximize the profits. The agreements clearly indicates the violation of US Sherman Antitrust Act which says that entering into cartel agreement even with the foreign nations is illegal and are subjected to be found guilty of felony. Though Goliath argument that US market will not be affected may be true but they are acting against the law there a case would be filed against them. As far as Junior Ltd. is concerned it is not subjected to this act since it is working outside US. CASE STUDY II Lets look at the scenario clearly. MBI is a multi national corporation that has been manufacturing and...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

EU Law

...other commercial organisation importing clementines. The applicant could not show that it was specifically discriminated against. However, in Cordorniu although the Court of Justice held that the Regulation was generally applicable the applicant was successful as it was able to show an infringement of its trade mark rights which the Regulation would have overridden. Therefore it is submitted that in view of the fact that the Regulation is generalised in its application and that neither party can show direct discrimination, their application(s) must fail. Bibliography Craig, P and De Burca G, (2002), EU Law, Text, Cases and Materials, OUP Charles and Dilshad: ...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Eu law

...Analysis of the case Kolpinghuis Nijmegen BV 80/86 (European Court of Justice) Question The facts of the particular case can be summarized as following: In Netherlands, the delivery of a beverage called ‘mineral water’ has been considered as breaching the national law (the article 2 of the country’s inspection regulation). The reason is that the above beverage is consisted of tap water and carbon dioxide. For this reason its delivery can be prohibited in accordance with the above mentioned national regulation where it is stated that the relevant authority has the power to prohibit the ‘stocking for sale and delivery of goods intended for trade and human consumption which are of unsound composition’. Question 2 The case commenced... this...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

EU law

...EUROPEAN UNION LAWS Question Under the European Union (EU) laws, a directive is an instrument, directing its Member Countries to perform wholly, the instructions mentioned in the said Directive and this shall be binding and mandatory on such Member States. Directives issued by EU need to be enforced by Member countries; there are seemingly no escapes, however, its modalities and modus operandi are subject matters to be decided by its National Courts and law makers. Norms of enforcement: However, what is important is that directives cannot be ignored, brushed aside or partially enforced by Member States, nor any compromises made on its practical...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic EU Law Case Studies for FREE!

Contact Us