If terrorism ever justify - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Everyday, there is mention of terrorism. More sadly, it has become a constant fear and concern for people. It is easy enough to see the evil in terrorist acts however, there is a lot more behind it than there would be in comparison to other crimes. As Singh points out, since terrorism is a socio-politically driven, there are more possible motivations and agenda behind it (379-380)…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.5% of users find it useful
If terrorism ever justify
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "If terrorism ever justify"

Everyday, there is mention of terrorism. More sadly, it has become a constant fear and concern for people. It is easy enough to see the evil in terrorist acts however, there is a lot more behind it than there would be in comparison to other crimes. As Singh points out, since terrorism is a socio-politically driven, there are more possible motivations and agenda behind it (379-380). At the same time, it is also because of the same reason of the on-going debate regarding whether terrorism can be justified or not. Then, to be able to know whether terrorism can be justified, there is a need to understand the reasons behind it, how terrorism it works and at the end, evaluate this against its impact to society and individuals.
A review of key studies done regarding terrorism show that it is not an easy topic to discuss much less understand. They point out that terrorism has deep roots in socio-political issues and as such have a great range of motivations and objectives (Edwards). It is for the same reason that the debate on whether terrorism can be justified or not is hard to settle. In general, most materials have been very critical of terrorist acts, citing their indiscriminate and long-term impact. There are also common assumption about who terrorists are and who are against it. At the same time, Jenkins says that there is an assumption that terrorism is always subversive or against social institutions.
Singh points out that the radical ideas at the core of terrorism are not new or unique. It is considered as a valid military strategy and has been used successfully in many military campaigns among the world's greatest civilizations (377-379). At the same time, Jenkins points out that in consideration alone of the worldwide response to recent terrorist activities, there is no denying that it can be used against perceived abusers (71). In combination with the ideological system behind terrorist movements, then there seems to be a basis for the claim that terrorism can sometimes be justified by those who commit or support it.
But Chomsky and Barsamian in contrast say that one of the difficulties in readily accepting these assumptions is that they hide the some elements of terrorism and terrorist movements and ideologies. This has the effect of limiting understanding behind issues, resolution of conflicts and the strategies that can be developed against. In a letter published online with the Free Arab Voice, the sentiments of a suicide bomber allow readers to see how people are driven to terrorist activities (Al 'Arabi). Though the writer admits that the act will cost the lives of others, she points out that her actions were a desperate act against injustice and future greater loss. She also does not just justify the act but more, considers it a form of heroism for one's country.
As much as Al 'Arabi's provide justification for terrorist acts, I can not help but think of the causalities. Terrorist acts do not choose their victims and they do not respect reason from other's perspective. What is more troubling is the moment that one accepts terrorism to be justified, then one should also accept response against it as justified regardless if they are justified themselves. As Chomsky and Barsamian point out, everyone struggling to gain social or political power can become terrorists when they are able to justify their cause beyond common and public good or the rights and interest of others. Rather than real justifications, efforts to make valid terrorism are efforts for rationalization. Therefore, acts of terrorism may present justified arguments but one considers all other perspectives and interests, these arguments can not be accepted by everyone to meet the standards of justification and more importantly, justice.
Works Cited
Al 'Arabi, Hujayra. "Confessions of a Human Bomb from Palestine". Free Arab Voice, 8 July 2006. 1 August 2008. .
Chomsky, Noam and Barsamian, David. "America Is a Serious Terrorist Threat". Terrorism. Ed. Laura K. Egendorf. Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. Edwards, Cliff. "Terrorism in the 20th Century". 2002. 1 August 2008. Jenkins, Brian Michael. "Does Terrorism Work". Mercury News, Vol. 3, 21 March 2004. p. 71.
Singh, Baljit. "An Overview of Terrorism", The Course of Ideas, 2nd edition, Jeanne Grunner and Ed Frankel ed. 1990, Harper Collins Publishing, New York. pp. 377-381 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“If terrorism ever justify Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
If terrorism ever justify Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from
(If Terrorism Ever Justify Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
If Terrorism Ever Justify Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words.
“If Terrorism Ever Justify Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF If terrorism ever justify


...a picture of what it is. Others linked it with civil disobedience while others label it as acts of violence. However, experts claimed that these three are very different terms from each other but in as much as one wished to gain adequate understanding of the word “terrorism”, it is crucial also to obtain insight about the other two terms often connected with it. Civil disobedience is deemed acceptable by many deliberative democrats as long as it remains relevantly tied to the objective of communicative action (Allen 15). However, Allen also emphasized that certain kinds of terrorism cannot be ruled out either (15). On the other hand, an individual must acknowledge that the deliberative democrat will not...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay


...? Terrorism Terrorism A risk assessment is an essential measure of identifying mitigation steps and procedures. Terrorism is no exception to this rule. A conventional procedure of risk assessment encompasses the analysis of motives, capabilities, opportunities and targets. To prevent the acts of terrorism, especially nuclear terrorism, law enforcement and intelligence agencies should define the scope of skills and resources needed to executive a successful attack, the signs and symptoms of an intention to conduct an attack involving nuclear materials, access and availability of nuclear weapons among terrorist groups, as well as the locations that are most likely to be targeted. Since its inception, the nuclear bomb has been one... of the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


...?Introduction Terrorism refers to the use of unlawful violence and threats to intimi governments and the society at large so that unpopular ideologies can be recognized (Hoffman, 2003). Terrorist activities have continued to claim the lives of innocent civilians, especially due to the fact that such criminals are always brutal when it comes to executing their plans to the extent of committing suicide in the process. To them, success is when a maximum number of casualties are recorded in a single strike as they view this as a positive development towards convincing their targets, who may be forced to soften their stand on the issue in dispute so as to protect life. This paper is a critical evaluation of terrorism and the factors... that...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Justify public administrators'

... Assessment of Bureaucracy Bureaucracy is considered to be a systematic structure in a society. However, what is the “ideal type” being referred to by Max Weber? Max Weber asserts that “an ideal type is formed by the one-sided accentuation of one or more points of view” according to which “concrete individual phenomena are arranged into a unified analytical construct” (Kim, 2007). With this definition of ideal type, an implication is drawn upon which deals with the importance of different individual points-of-view that collectively function to form a system. Therefore, it provides an assumption that personal opinions matter to the nourishment of a functioning system like the government. The personal points of view are necessary... Assessment...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper


...?  TerrorismTerrorism Question I believe that terrorism as a criminal activity that can be committed domesticallyhas changed policing. This is because law enforcement agents face the unpredictable condition of having to immediately deal with crisis situations, which are both crimes and war. This new pattern of crime has surpassed the previous clear boundary between law enforcement and national defense. Therefore, the notion of policing is changing to incorporate a wider range of risks than in previous times. Terrorism has made numerous public law enforcement agents to go back into the community, for example, rather than responding to calls or riding on...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper


..., yet, they are seen as ‘liberators’ by local Tamils. Thus, the answer to whether the Tamil Tigers are terrorists or not is a complicated one that is dependent on subjective, biased analysis of power politics of Sri Lanka. 2) In the aftermath of the attack on the World Trade Center, the question of terrorism as a justifiable means to achieving liberation has been hotly debated within the United States of America. While many believe that terrorism, an act of harm, can never justify a quest for national freedom, there are also arguments that see terrorism as understandable under certain circumstances. The use of violence in Apartheid South Africa, in pre...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Is terrorism ever justified

... 30 July 2008 IS TERRORISM EVER JUSTIFIED Terrorism is one of the most terrible threats and evils faced bymodern community. Terrorism cannot be justified because it is an aggression of one nation or a group of people against another. In most terrorist attacks, innocent victims are killed or injured. Terrorism represents a threat for a modern society because it is an attack on legitimate transnational order. Thesis Terrorism cannot be justified because it brings fear and anxiety to peaceful populations, it causes killing and injuries to innocent people and because it involves rise of military and police forces, a threat to global peace and security. Terrorism cannot be justified because it causes fear and anxiety among peaceful... a...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Has terrorism ever succeeded in changing political reality

...Has terrorism ever succeeded in changing political reality? The origins of the word “terrorist” are rather ironic. It seem as though it stems from the French Revolution, when the bloody group of individuals who were members of the Jacobin Club coined the word “terrorist” to describe the kind of person needed for the Reign Of Terror. The violence was seen as an unfortunate but necessary evil that needed to be used to advance a greater political good. It is unlikely that many modern terrorists would describe their own actions any differently. To call someone a terrorist, or as often occurred with the Jacobins, to call oneself a terrorist was a mark of honor. To those subjected to that...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Is terrorism ever justified

...Is terrorism ever justified? There is no excuse to terrorism, however one may rationalize it. For instance, Noam Chomsky (2004) identified the US role in the rise of terrorist groups by training the network that would eventually serve as a backbone of Osama Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda group back in 1979. (Chomsky & Barsamian) This paper will argue that terrorism is not about who started what or who was to blame for the rise modern terrorism, but that the debate should focus on the fact that using it as a tool is fundamentally wrong, both ethically and morally. Terrorism, like violence, is a normative concept. It is, by its nature, defined and thought to be wrong no matter which society or which culture. Even within war, terror tactics... are...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Can terrorism ever be morally justified

...Teacher’s This paper discusses whether the act of terrorism is justified or not. The topic is important philosophically because as we know, terrorism remains one of the most important challenges of the 21st century as it threatens the stability of international community. Not only does it endanger the governments and weaken economies, but also destabilize societies. It indeed has become more of an international enigma now and while social sciences study the causes, main varieties, history traces, and consequences of terrorism and also try to explain how terrorism has evolved over the years, philosophy focuses on two fundamental queries: What is...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic If terrorism ever justify for FREE!

Contact Us