Nobody downloaded yet

Company Law shareholders - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Samantha holding 5% of the shares in Filo Ltd as against 52% held together (26% each) by the two directors Richard Anthony and Joan, is obviously a minority shareholder in the company. Even if she garners support of other shareholders, they would still form only 48% as a minority group.
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.4% of users find it useful
Company Law shareholders
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Company Law shareholders"

Download file to see previous pages Remedies available to Samantha are bringing action section 994 (old459) of the Companies Act meant for Minority Shareholders' petitions against the directors' misrule etc. and also a derivative action.
From time immemorial, minority shareholder has been discouraged to take action against the directors on the grounds of company being run on majority concept and on the basis of action if any should be taken only by the Company on the directors and not the shareholder in individual capacity. In Foss v Harbottle1, it was observed by the court that minority should rather take necessary action through the internal forum of company meetings. Wigram VC stated that in view of the majority rule, any unlawful conduct of the directors was capable of being ratified by the majority and that it was not possible for the court to intervene. The only exception to the rule as observed by Jenkins LJ in Edwards v Halliwell(1950)2, could be that the minority shareholder should show that the directors accused of fraud were actually in control of the company rather than merely maintaining that majority could not lawfully ratify the wrong acts of the directors.3 In Ebrahimi v Westbourne Galleries Ltd4, the minority shareholder Ebrahimi sued on the basis oppression of minority and winding up on just and equitable grounds. The second one was accepted by the court holding that individual's rights should be respected and the rights were not necessarily submerged by the artificial corporate entity context.
The minority shareholder Samantha is of the opinion that the purchase of the property of Pastry Products for 450,000 by Filo Ltd is prejudicial to its interests and now she has learnt that both the directors are together holding 44%(each 22%) of shares of that company and the proceeds of the sale of the property have been used for payment of that company's dividends.
Regulation 81(a) of Table A of Articles Filo Ltd has adopted, governs removal of directors along with other regulations from 81(b) to (e). Regulation 81(a) says "the office of a director shall be vacated if-(a) he ceases to be a director by virtue of any provision of the Act or he becomes prohibited by law from being a director"5 Besides, a director enjoys immunity as per regulation 118 which indemnifies every director against liability incurred by way of defence to any civil or criminal proceedings in case of judgment or reliefs in his favour. On the other hand a person conducting shareholder litigation has to meet costs from his own sources in case of the derivative claim being rejected by the court.
As per the new Act's section 172 which came into force from October 1, 2007, directors must "promote the success of the company for the benefit of the members as a whole"6 as against the earlier parallel provision that they should act "in the best interests" of the company. Government has clarified that "to promote the success" means "long-term increase in value" though this is subject to being confronted by a competing definition from potential litigants. Under Section 175 of the new Act, director has duty to avoid conflict of interests. There should not be a situation involving exploitation of any property, information, or opportunity whether or not they are advantageous to the company. The acquisitioning of the property by Filo Limited from Pastry Products in which both of the directors hold 44% of shares falls under this section. Further it has been stated that ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Company Law shareholders Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Company Law shareholders Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1527510-company-law-shareholders
(Company Law Shareholders Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Company Law Shareholders Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1527510-company-law-shareholders.
“Company Law Shareholders Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1527510-company-law-shareholders.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Company Law shareholders

Company Law

...? Company law has been an interesting matter of study since decades. In the company law a variety of difference exists between the liability of the directors or the employees and thus they are convicted based on certain situation. The paper studies two different cases and helps to analyze the difference between the judgments provided based on the variability of the situation. It also underlines the fact that the courts held matter of fraud in a serious manner. Williams Vs. Natural Life Health Foods Ltd The case of William vs. Natural Life Health foods limited is an important element of study in the company law and the contract...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Corporate Governance and Ownership

...governance of Chinese companies. Even after the establishment of Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges in the 1990s, about two-thirds of all listed companies’ outstanding shares are owned by the state and were non-tradable until recently. The corporate governance problems derived from State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) have been subjected to research from various perspectives. First, the ownership structure of many listed companies in China presents a major obstacle, which inhibits minority shareholder activism. Under Chinese company law, those who hold shares in companies with controlling share-owners may submit proposals,...
32 Pages(8000 words)Essay

Company law

...? Topic (Company Law) A company acquires its legal personality after registration under the companies Act. Through incorporation, a company becomes a legal entity separate and distinct from its members who are the shareholders. Registration of a company involves delivery of memorandum of association, article of association, declaration by promoters of their intention of being formed into a company and list of directors to the registrar of companies as entailed in the companies Act. The company registration constitutes it “a body corporate.” It becomes a...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Company law

...Corporate Law, LexisNexis, NSW. Chapple, Larelle and Lipton, Phillip 2002, Corporate Authority and Dealings with Officers and Agents, CCH Australia Limited, Melbourne, Viewed 16 September 2012, . Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v The Rank Organisation Ltd. [1985] BCLC 11. NTAA Corporate 2012, Companies, Trusts, Super Funds, viewed 5 September 2012, PWC 2011, A guide to directors’ duties and responsibilities for non-listed public companies and proprietary companies in Australia, PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, Australia. [Online]. Available at:...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Company Law - English law

...and not to shareholders or creditors, present or future.15 However there have been statutory inroads on the common law presumption under the Insolvency Act (ss212-214, ss238-240) and Schedule 1 of the Companies Directors Disqualification Act 1986. The directors' powers to dispose of company assets and any procedural requirements will be detailed in the Articles. At common law directors must not use their powers for an improper purpose; this is assessed objectively16. The directors appear to have been motivated to ensure LJM Limited obtained valuable assets as cheaply as possible, rather than to ensuring that W&H Limited obtained the best...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

Company Law, Business Law

...May 23, 2006 Academia Research Topic: Exam questions for Business Law (Company Law Adam owns 11% of the shares in a medium-sized company, andthat company owns a chain of fast food outlets around Wales. Apparently, the board of directors has decided to implement two recent special resolutions to alter the articles of association. Additionally, Adam is uncomfortable with the decision of the board of directors because the board of directors no longer needs to obtain the approval of the shareholders for certain high-value transactions. Mostly, the majority rule usually prevails when voting over certain issues pertaining to the...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

UK Company Law Shareholders and Directors

...Order 156623. SHAREHOLDERS AND DIRECTORS INTRODUCTION The directors of a company are entitled to exercise all powers and to do all such duties and things as the company is authorized to exercise or do, except those that are required by the companies Act or done by the company in a General meeting. In enjoying their powers and duties the Directors are subject to their provision of the Act and any regulations made by the company in General meeting. The board of directors of a company are entitles to exercise all such powers and do all such acts and things as the company is authorized to exercise and...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

CEO's letters to shareholders - Coca-Cola Company

...to the shareholders of Pepsi Co. during 2006, Pepsi Co has been able to achieve a volume growth of over 5% with net revenue growth of 8% whereas the earnings per share grew by 13% showing a very significant performance of the company in the year under review. Further letter to the shareowners also mention that the company has been able to generate an operating cash flow of $6.1 billions which is a very strong indicator of the short term solvency of the company and ability of its operations to generate positive cash flows rather than relying on the external sources to fund its operations. The success of Pepsi co lies in the fact that it has a very hard working work force,...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Business Law (company law)

...Limited Liability Company Limited Liability Company Introduction A limited liability company can be described as a supple form of business enterprise that combines aspects of partnership and corporate features. Basically, a limited liability company is not a corporation; instead it is a legal type of company that offers limited liability to its stakeholders. Limited liability singularly is described as the amount that is invested in a company. The shareholders are allowed to claim ownership only up to the respective amounts that they have invested in the business. General partners, alternatively, are bound by an unlimited...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Shareholders

...Shareholders Question Various stakeholders have been invited in the conference and each of the stakeholders has a different role to play. A bariatrician who is involved in the issues of obesity has been invited. Transplant cardiologist is also part of the stakeholders in the conference. Other stakeholders include cardiologists, nutritionists, public health officials, occupation medicine physician, dieticians, health insurance expert, lawyer, depression psychiatrist, physical activity experts and neurologists. Each of the stakeholders in the conference is an expert in different fields including law. The information from the stakeholders will play an essential role in the prevention of heart diseases. Question 2 Management team... Question...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic Company Law shareholders for FREE!

Contact Us