When it was said "Imperialism generates underdevelopment, using 'underdevelopment' as a term to cover both lack of capitalist industry and unevenness of industrial development along with mass misery within that development, it was Warren who replied that imperialism generates development meaning growth of capitalism, and increasing evenness of development, and increased social welfare"…
Download file to see previous pages...
It is precisely for such reasons that a quick recognition of the positive qualities, the psychological fundamentals, among the poor themselves is mandatory for poverty alleviation in particular.
Most of the dependency theory writers hold the opinion that the "same process that brought development to the homelands of capitalism and to North America and Australasia simultaneously brought underdevelopment to the rest of the colonized world, trapping previously autonomous societies in poverty that was self-perpetuating because any significant profits made in them was extracted by Western firms or rulers". (Frank, 1978)
"Underdevelopment evolve an important feature of dependency theory with the proposition that the end of colonialism was apparent rather than real, "decolonisation" being really a transition to "neocolonialism," in which foreign capital continued to exploit the local population but with protection from a local client-state rather than from European officials. This analysis was built upon in left-wing critiques of U.S. government policy as well as of transnational corporations, which covers around 1500-1840, and elsewhere elaborated from the classic "dependency" argument in his own "world system" framework. This, however, envisaged some scope for upward economic mobility for underdeveloped countries and provided some recognition of a reality that was then becoming increasingly clear: that industrialisation was underway in formerly "underdeveloped" countries of East Asia in the 1960s to 1980s, while there had also been long-term growth of manufacturing in certain other parts of the third world, most notably Brazil". (2006b)
In other words, the problem was not only about poverty and underdevelopment, but also as some Caribbean economists admitted, it was all about governance and the instigated psychology of dependence. Ramesh writes, "as these researchers noted, Lewis' 'strategies for industrialisation' went beyond pure economic factors and in fact required that the population develop 'drive and appropriate attitudes'. But such 'drives', social motivations and attitudes can only find sustaining viability in an accommodating, enhancing environment. If not, even when they appear they did not blossom. The recent history of the social and political life of the Caribbean has been one of grand promises and broken expectations, of broken spirits always fighting to heal and console themselves over and over again. And the psychological consequences have been quite debilitating". (Ramesh, 2000, p. 4)
When it comes to social and political life, it is true that "Power and poverty are two of the most dominant issues in social science. They seem to occupy opposite ends in the continuum of human life. In fact, power, especially the lack of it, is inextricably linked to the condition and experience of poverty. Hence, it is useful to have both a macro view of development and as well a micro view of the poverty experience. The struggle of poor people to gain
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Imperialism, Race and Development Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1523864-imperialism-race-and-development
(Imperialism, Race and Development Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Imperialism, Race and Development Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1523864-imperialism-race-and-development.
In Chapter 8 of this book the author deals with the problem of racism/racialism in the doctrine and practice of British policies with regard to the non-white colonial populations. The aim of this paper is to review the argument advanced by Johnson (2003) and to present my own conclusions about the subject in question.
The most important European governments have decided that their political and international programs must to extend their hegemony to other countries. Africa and India was two of some continents who suffered the European invasion. After 1871 year, were happened important historical phenomena that have changed the life of America country.
The concept of race and its definition has been discussed in the first passage of the article titled Origins of the Race Concept (Winant, 172). The subject of race has always been a controversial sociological subject because there have been major disagreements among scholars regarding the precise meaning of the concept of “race”.
For him, the real estate investors, the oil companies, and many companies were busy exploiting the rest of the society and there was need to protect the society against this. For many, the industrial revolution would eventually be strong enough to ensure that the benefits were actually well distributed in the society.
Although various laws have been abolished and enacted over the years to eliminate racism in the country against people of all races, the social evil continues to plague the nation even today. The domestic and foreign policies of United States are rooted in the country’s history which is riddled with racial inequality, gross misappropriation of social justice, and devoid of any ideals which are today, granted to all human beings - that of liberty, equality, justice and most of all human dignity.
In fact, some women became leading propagandists of the Empire. A name that comes across as an example for this category is that of Flora Shaw (first colonial Editor, Times, 1890-1900), who believed in white superiority and held a masculinist view of the empire.
The term ‘development’ may be given different meaning as every individual’s perspective allows him in a particular period of time (Coopper.1999). The world has passed through feudalism, Colonialism, Capitalism etc., to reach the present state of development. It has been
This is an indication that the decision by the European nations to colonize Africa was not right (Bush 17).
Leaders who planned on how to occupy Africa had no aim of developing the continent in their mind. Instead,
It is possible through annexation, infiltration, war, military conquest, and political pressure. Once the territory conquered, it becomes a colony of the conquering nation, sometimes benevolently denoted to as “mother country.” Therefore,
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Imperialism, Race and Development for FREE!