We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

P&G - Essay Example

Comments (0)
The notion that a firm's skills and capabilities in new product development can be a source of competitive advantage, especially as almost all industries are becoming more dynamic, is widely accepted by both practitioners and academics. As firms seek to become more innovative and prolific in product development, many have reached outside their boundaries for information and assistance…
Download full paper

Extract of sample

Download file to see previous pages... It is equally important, if not more so, that innovation is cost-effective, aligned with consumer demands and addresses a perceived gap in the market. In other words, not only is the strategy for corporate survival continued product development and innovation, but the cost-effective development of innovative products which market research indicates will attract the consumer market. Proctor and Gamble has resolved the seemingly complex equation of cost-effective continued product development and equation through its "connect and develop" strategy. Indeed, P&G's approach to product development and innovation has the potential to serve as a critically valuable lesson to corporations across the world.
The hurdles to new product development are cost and innovation. As Huston and Sakkab (2006, p. 60) write, "Most companies are still clinging to what we call the invention model, centered on a bricks-and-mortar R&D infrastructure and the idea that their innovation must principally reside within their own four walls." Confining product development to the company and to individuals working in the company often means that development will be a costly and time-consuming process. The reason, as Huston and Sakkab (2006) illustrate through reference to a case study, is that when a company begins the R&D process with an idea for a new product or an innovation to an existing product, it may not have the technology to translate the idea into a reality. The company's in-house Research and Development team will then have to experiment with several technologies to bring the idea to life and, of course, may and may not succeed. Even if they succeed, success comes at high financial cost. Furthermore, as Brown and Eisenhardt (1995) argue, because the process is often a length one, there is always the risk that a competitor may beat them to the market with the technology and product. In this case, the return on the new product research and development investment may not be realized. Hence, a financial risk factor enters into the equation.
Proctor and Gamble stumbled across a high radical approach for new product development and innovation when it found itself confronting numerous technological obstacles to the manufacturing of their innovative Pringle line of imprinted chips. Initially relying on in-house talent for the development of the required technology, Proctor and Gamble soon found the process excessively costly, unrealistic and unfeasible in terms of implementation. It was at this point that P&G decided to look outside its walls for a solution and, with that in mind, developed and circulated a technology brief which outlined the problem. The response was positive and the company was approach by a baker in Italy who had already developed the technology in question. Proctor and gamble obtained the rights to the use of the technology, developed it to suit their specific needs and were, as a result, able to successfully produce their new line of Pringle chips at a fraction of the cost they would have otherwise run into.
Huston and Sakkab (2006) concede to the fact that the approach adopted by Procter and Gamble is a radical one. As new product development, inclusive of research and development, often functions as a firm's competitive edge, corporations generally tend to prefer to keep all research, development and product ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Launch of P&G InsecKill Insecticide in the UK
This is a marketing plan for Proctor & Gamble (P&G) Company for the launch of its latest and new product the “InsecKill’ insecticide in the UK market. The company considers it important to first identify a cost-effective and functional planning process before launching the new product in the UK market.
18 Pages(4500 words)Essay
Adding value through marketing:the cases of LOreal and P&G
The best informal definition, however, of a brand perhaps could be that it is a real estate - that a firm, a product or a service, buys in the minds of its customer.This is not bought overnight, but earned over the years by persistent and consistent efforts through such measures as creating awareness, increasing the perceived quality,
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay
Notwithstanding such daunting issues, businesses have to make decisions based on growth trends of existing product lines, competitors’ moves and the forces of globalization. Key words: Detergents, product launch, competition, barriers, five force analysis, market matrix, change management, first mover advantage, Euro Brand.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
P & G Japan: The SK-II Globalization project
Market analysis is important in making choices for expansion of the brand into wider markets and increasing its market share (Egelhoff 37). This is because analysis of different markets enables a company to compare the opportunities, risks and costs associated with different markets before a choice of the market for product expansion is made.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Organisational Effectiveness at Google and P&G
P&G has an internal process model with hierarchical values. Nevertheless, it also has market-oriented values. Google has an open systems model with human resource values. It swaps employees with P&G because of its openness to learning and the appeal of P&G’s advertising expenses.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Internationalization of Procter & Gamble (P&G)
An article in the Fortune Europe edition (April 17th, 2006) wrote that Procter & Gamble (number 24 in their Fortune 500 list) owned as many as 22 brands with each exceeding 1$ billion in sales. P&G had acquired 5 of these brands during the course of its $61 billion acquisition of Gilette (which was acclaimed as the largest merger of the year 2005).
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Mr. Bob was assigned this target of designing such a product with the collaboration of IDEO, the consulting firm for P&G. In a room at IDEO, different designers were applying their own
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Open innovation: P&G
However, the approach for innovation has evolved. Innovation can be broadly categorised into open and closed innovation. According to Chesbrough (2003b, p. 23) “successful innovation requires control.” Closed innovation is based on the underlying assumption that successful innovation can only be achieved through control.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
, which include Tide soap detergent, Crest toothpaste, Crest White strips, Pampers, and Olay ProX, which reduces the appearance of wrinkles as effectively, if not more so, than expensive prescriptions and skin applications. P & G has boasted of having the best research
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
Global supply chain analysis of P&G in the UK
The product manufactured by this consumer goods giant is sold in over 140 countries through the help of a robust supply chain network. The management of Procter and Gamble has emphasized a lot on implementing
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic P&G for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us