Summary to essay on topic "Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law"
Negligence is the omission to do something that a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily negotiate the conduct of human affairs would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do:
In law, a person has a duty of care towards his neighbour…
Download file "Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law" to see previous pages...
In the fair child's case, the industrial employers had a duty of care towards the employees in ensuring that:-
A man purchased a bottle of ginger-beer from a shop to be used by his girlfriend. But the bottle in which the beer was contained was opaque and it was impossible to clearly see its contents. Let us write or edit the essay on your topic "Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law" with a personal 20% discount.. Try it now It was later found that the beer contained remains of a snail on pouring out the beer. The girlfriend got sick and sued the manufacturer for damages in tort. It was held that the defendant was liable since he owed her a duty of care to ensure that the bottle should contain any other objects apart from the beer itself.
Under the tort of negligence, the plaintiff cannot successfully sue the defendant unless he/she proofs that he was injured. Even if damage is evident, the plaintiff must also proof that he suffered injury directly attributable to the damage. The plaintiff might suffer injury not directly attributable to the damage. If this is the case, his action will fail. 2
In Fairchild's case, the workers inhaled excessive asbestos and contracted mesotheliona, a cancer associated with the inhalation of such substances. The injury here is this disease suffered. This would give the worker an automatic a way to sue their employers for damages. The situation would have changed had the workers not contracted the disease or any injury of a similar nature. The employers know very well that excessive inhalation of the asbestos would cause the disease but they did not take reasonable steps to avid it.
Standard of Care
Apart from just the duty of care that one owes his neighbour in his actions that he ought to have him in contemplation, there are cases where standard of care need to be shown. The courts have the burden to proof whether the defendants had standard of care.
A standard of care is thus expected from an ordinary prudent person in a given situation. If a person has placed himself or made others believe that he can execute a given task, then he owes his clients a standard of care to do such a task without harming the client. A doctor for instant in a reputable hospital owes a patient a standard of care and should carry out his work expected of a doctor from such a hospital and expect to be given such a standard of care. 3
Causation of Damage under Negligence
The general rule under negligence is that the burden of proofing negligence would lie on the plaintiff. But in case of accidents in the workplace, the plaintiff need not proof negligence if that accident could not have occurred were the defendant not negligent.
In such cases, the plaintiff relies on the principle of 'Res Ipsa Loquitor" i.e.; let the facts speak by themselves. The burden of proof then shift to the defendant. The defendant would then convince the courts that the accident would still have occurred without his own negligence. 4
If the defendant successfully argues that he was not negligent or convinces the world
...Download file "Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law" to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document "Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law"
(“Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law Essay”, n.d.)
Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1500788-law-of-tort-fundamentals-of-business-law
(Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law Essay)
Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1500788-law-of-tort-fundamentals-of-business-law.
“Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1500788-law-of-tort-fundamentals-of-business-law.
Cited: 0 times
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC "Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law"
Nonetheless, this division of law is very extensive, even though it transacts principally with defining the responsibilities and rights of businesses, instead of implementing these laws. Since it has an widespread range, Business law has generated a huge number of legal procedure part subcategories, which comprise of Banking, Sales and Secured Transactions, Landlord-Tenant, Real Estate Transactions, Mortgages, Debtor and Creditor, Consumer Credit, Bankruptcy, Contracts, and Negotiable Instruments.
The thesis statement of this paper would be holding is that the law of contract and tort law are similar in nature and it is, therefore, difficult to distinguish between the two legal concepts. The researcher will also make an earnest attempt to evaluate the statement in terms of ADR’s ability as a viable alternative to the court system.
In this case, Mr Jones sustained an injury as a result of an accident at his workplace on 13th of September 2010. He works for Cwmfelin University as a maintenance man. Whilst he was walking down some stairs at the University on the day in question, he lost his footing on a loose step and lost balance which subsequently resulted in the injury.
The researcher of the essay states that under the tort law, if anyone suffers a legal, economical or physical harm, she or he may be entitled to file a suit which when considered to be valid. Issues of nuisance, the issues arising in form of liability in the tort of negligence and causation are mentioned in the essay.
In other terms, tort refers to a collection of rights, responsibilities and remedies applicable in the justice system, more so in civil lawsuits to compensate and relieve those affected or harmed by the wrongful actions or omissions by others1. Those who sustain injuries or losses due to tortious conducts are referred to as plaintiffs while those responsible for the injuries and are liable for the damages are referred to as defendants or tortfeasors2.
However, Kofsy should have discussed the problem with the boss of the company than just an employee for faster results. Also, the employee, Pat Seiple could have relayed the message as well to the boss so something could have been done. But this is not the case here.
As the author of the essay puts it, Golden Rule or British Rule of statutory interpretation gives authority to the judge to dismiss the literal meaning of a word in order to prevent passing an illogical ruling. It is emphasized that Golden rule will qualify a literal rule in a case where the literal rule is not applied where doing so will lead o injustice.
The argument behind this case is that the occupier conducting the construction operations is aware of the danger and therefore is under obligation to offer protection.
One such case which was controversial was
Transfer also terminates ownership. Personal savings, gifts, donations, and loans are the sources of capital (Miller 2012, p. 496).
Partnership is formed by agreement among partners who contribute capital. It
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Law of Tort, Fundamentals of Business Law"
with a personal 20% discount.