StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Censorship and Banning Books Has No Place in the Modern Democratic Societies - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of "Censorship and Banning Books Has No Place in the Modern Democratic Societies" paper states that books should never be banned, especially in multicultural societies, which are always open to relative and multiple interpretations of ideas…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
Censorship and Banning Books Has No Place in the Modern Democratic Societies
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Censorship and Banning Books Has No Place in the Modern Democratic Societies"

Book Banning of the of the Concerned Professor November 11, 2009 Book Banning In the modern Western civilization, if the freedom of expression is gaining grounds on the one hand, there have been ample incidents where some sections of the society and the state machinery tend to support censorship and banning of books at one pretext or other. The point that needs to be understood is that every idea carries in its fold multiple ramifications and it is always easy and feasible to justify the suppression of an idea or a piece of literature by alluding to the possibly negative impact it may have on the masses in general and the children in particular. One could always come out with the excuses that a specific work of literature or a book could destabilize the society or may have a drastic affect on the impressionable minds (Nocera, 1982).. However, the very act of banning books violates the freedom of speech guaranteed in the constitution and amounts to the deplorable act of suppressing an idea. No free society can allow for the suppression of original and innovative ideas. Freedom and creativity is primarily about allowing for a free play of ideas in a nation and a society, and the act of censorship or the suppression of ideas amounts to intellectual and academic elitism or for that matter orthodoxy. Books should never be banned, especially in the multicultural societies, which are always open to relative and multiple interpretations of ideas. In a free society, every idea and ideology has the right to find its place in the print. Just because a vast section of the society or a majority group does not particularly agree with an idea, this in no way allows for constraining or hampering the dissemination of an idea cherished and liked by a minority part of the society. Certainly, it does not mean that there exists nothing like bad or evil ideas. However, even if an idea is bad or evil in its ramifications, the censorship or banning of such an idea not only bolsters its hold over the society, but hits hard at the very fundamental ethos of the democratic societies like free speech, tolerance and the acceptance of off beat or innovative ideas and views. Ideas should be counteracted, and opposed by ideas and not by autocratic and coercive means like statutory provisions and governmental or state regulation (Nocera, 1982). Such ethos not only allow a society to be ever fresh, innovative and vibrant, but usher in a quintessentially tolerant and catholic intellectual atmosphere, where a free flow and interaction of multiple ideas leads to growth, development and a continual revival of the society. A controversial work of literature always has the potential to give way to debates and discussions in the social arena, which is the hallmark of all the free and democratic societies. To some extent, the banning of the books is justified, especially in the contemporary scenarios marred by a widespread proliferation of hate ideologies and international terrorism. However, the kind of books that need to be banned are the ones that promote hate and intolerance against a particular section of the society, that teach people to operate lethal weapons and how to make bombs, that intend to perpetrate violence and abuse, that threaten or intimidate the masses or that discernibly and unambiguously intend to jeopardize social, religious and political harmony and tolerance. Yet, the very act of censorship and book banning cold be carried beyond the limits of reason and understanding by framing or dubbing the diverse or varied interpretations of ideas as being blasphemous, anti-social, pervert or unpatriotic. So its better that the national conscience and the state focus their power on obstructing and suppressing the obviously violent and intolerant groups and texts, rather then coming heavily on the seemingly innocuous and essentially cerebral works of literature which express or profess a different or a relatively unpopular perspective. The very act of counteracting intolerance should never be allowed to degenerate into a system that is in itself intolerant of diversity and intellectual freedom. What is freedom but allowing the people to choose what the want to read and respecting their right to choose In an adult scenario, it sounds totally nonsensical and absurd for the intellectual elites and the state to decide what people may read or what they should not read. Censorship and banning books in a way is tantamount to demeaning and insulting the citizens' capacity or ability to discern and choose and their right to make choices for themselves. There should be no curb on the publishing and sales on any work of literature or non-fiction and people must be allowed to decide whether they want to read a particular book or not. When it comes to the children, parents do have the right to decide whether the reading of a particular book is good for their children or not. Parents do have the right to make choices as to the preferences or the reading habits of their children. However, clamoring for the banning of a book is excessively much and one simply cannot be delegated the right to decide for other people's children. "now the gate is open so wide that some parents believe that they have the right to demand immediate removal of any book for any reason from school or classroom libraries (Blume, 1999)". For an idea that is, obnoxious to one may be stimulating or motivating for someone else. Everyone has the right to select the intellectual diet one wants to consume. Hence, censorship and banning books has no place in the modern democratic societies, barring the works that conclusively intend to propagate violence, intolerance and abuse. Democracy is about allowing the proliferation of diverse ideas and a willingness to allow for the interaction and collision of ideas. The state should be very careful and discerning while exercising the power of censorship and must avoid being swayed by the majority or popular opinion. The right and the ability of the masses to choose for themselves ought to be respected. Parents do have the right to regulate the reading preferences of their progeny, but no authority or parent can be allowed to make decisions for other people's children Total Words: 1,007 Works Cited Blume, Judy (1999). Is Harry Potter Evil Retrieved November 11, 2009 from National Coalition Against Censorship Web site: http://www.ncac.org/censorship_news/ 20030305cn076Is_Harry_Potter_Evil_by_Judy_Blume.cfm Nocera, Joseph. (1982). The Big Book-Banning Brawl. New Republic, 20, 2225. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Book Banning Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Book Banning Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1500500-book-banning
(Book Banning Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Book Banning Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1500500-book-banning.
“Book Banning Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1500500-book-banning.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Censorship and Banning Books Has No Place in the Modern Democratic Societies

Political Communication in the Electronic Age

Neither letter-writing nor newspaper delivery can provide the instant information that is today essential for businesses in the modern world to compete effectively and simply a fact of life that is taken for granted for most in the developed world.... In the paper 'Political Communication in the Electronic Age' the author analyzes new practices in modern with the introduction of the internet and communications.... Worldwide establishment of the internet throughout most cultures and countries has revolutionized the way people live their lives....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

Censorship in the Creative Media

Censorship is common in any country – authoritarian, democratic, dictatorial, or otherwise.... In democratic institutions, civil liberties must be rooted in the freedom of speech and expression.... In fact, one of the essential foundation stones of a democratic society is freedom of expression.... n a democratic society, the media must be left free to publish, and the public must be let free to receive the information and the opinions....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

The Ways the Internet Has to Expand Contemporary Mediated Public Life

The paper "The Ways the Internet Has to Expand Contemporary Mediated Public Life" discusses that the effects and the influence of the new media were evident from the various Arab revolution cases, and also recent events in America, among other societies.... The supporters of the new field of discourse maintain that the internet is a means that can be used for the expansion of civil discourse in improving the rationality of public opinion; the arena allows citizens to participate in the politics of their societies....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Effectiveness of Digital Media

his paper looks into the overall role of social media and the modern digital technology that has enabled people to mobilize.... This paper ''Digital Media'' tells us that digital media has become an important part of our life.... While there was a time when digital media was related to private activities, in the most recent developments, digital media has become an integral part of the political domain.... , which is characterized by the presence of social media has been an agent of mobilization....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

To What Extent is the Media Independent of State

The author of the essay "To What Extent is the Media Independent of State" aims to show that the dependency between government and media is a contentious issue in modern times.... In any critical discussion of modern geo-polity, the word 'propaganda' finds recurrent mention.... The state of mass media in Britain, as in other modern democracies, should be also be gauged in the context of its participation in ideological propaganda.... In essence, Alex Carey is suggesting that in the United States, the media has become subservient to the state (Pilger, 2005)....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Cyber Law - Content Regulation and Censorship in the Government

It is an era which wherein a significant proportion of key ideas of the modern regulatory state are devoid of a common currency.... The internet has facilitated the development and creation of transnational civil societies and capitalism whereby the traditional forms of law are rendered ineffective and have become obsolete with the ever-increasing use and expansion of the internet.... The internet has facilitated the development and creation of transnational civil societies and capitalism whereby the traditional forms of law are rendered ineffective and have become obsolete with the ever-increasing use and expansion of the internet....
18 Pages (4500 words) Article

Democracy and Freedom of Speech

This report "Democracy and Freedom of Speech" discusses freedom of speech that is the very heart of a democratic society.... Of great importance to the development of modern-day democracy with respect to the demokratia reform was disasters.... Although the system of demokratia survived for less than 200 years, it remains a great contribution to modern-day democracy.... Part of the human race has always favored people to be left free to express themselves....
13 Pages (3250 words) Report

Wikileaks and the Freedom of the Press

The corporation has their team that verifies news stories through traditional investigative journalism frameworks and also more modern technology-based strategies.... The paper 'Wikileaks and the Freedom of the Press' will clearly highlight the controversies that the corporation has been involved in, its role in the press and also the justification that WikiLeaks has advanced the freedom of the media through their transparency efforts of revealing the truth behind the various practices....
7 Pages (1750 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us