Download file to see previous pages...
In Galileo's Interventionist Notion of "Cause", Steffen Ducheyne has deliberated on Galileo's development of a "new notion of causality" (p.443), which was primarily based on interventionist school. Steffen used respective studies and analyses from past and current researchers and presented his point of view after contrasting it from pro and con views, thus, highlighted his own point of view in an oblique way. Steffan said that Galileo believed that in order to find a causal link, one should be able to manipulate changes and the resultant changes should be reflected as effects of original changes. Thus, if A causes B and changes in A also affect B, causal relationship is established. Galileo, like a seeker, was looking for the hidden and accidental causes of effects. He was more interested in the "root" than in the "how" of a cause.Analysts have been divided by the question of whether Galileo really presented causal inquiries in his explanations of nature's phenomena as causal explanations are more easily found in Galileo's earlier works than later ones. An analysis by Ernan supported Galileo by reinterpreting this absence of "cause" in Galileo's later works as an increasing focus on kinematics, which was a precursor of dynamics, since only after properties of motion were described fully, can the respective causal explanations follow. Peter Machammer, however, believed that Galileo's unconcern for causes was reflected by the fact that he was not concerned with extrinsic causes but with "formal and final causes, and sometimes material causes" (Ducheyne, p.446). Galileo in his earliest work De Motu explicitly stated his quest not to seek for apparent causes of observable facts.
Galileo's usage of causal language may be analogous to Aristotelian reflection of causes as laid down in Aristotle's Posterior Analysis, and typified by a procedure involving analysis and deduction from observed effect to possible cause and reverse composition from cause to the effect. According to Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Galileo had achieved a remarkable feat of breaking away from traditional stereotyped Aristotelian concepts to scientific concepts that were used as a basis of "new sciences" and the foundation stone of new philosophy. (Peter Machamer, Encyclopedia of Philosophy).
It is how Galileo used causal explanation, Steffan believed, would help unravel Galileo's reasoning thread and allow the novel features, the interventionist element, in Galileo's causal explanations to come through. True causes, according to Galileo, should be closest or most efficacious in producing the effects. If an effect is not produced then the concerned element is not the true cause.
Julian Reiss in Causal Instrumental Variables and Interventions argued against taking causal inferences on the basis of causal claims as reliable if these were based on instrumental variables. He said that taking a set of assumptions to fulfill an instrument analogous to James Woodward's intervention and causal inference might be permissible. However, he argued that for the relationship to hold, the set of assumptions might have to be very strong (Julian Reiss, Causal Instrumental Variables and Interventions). Galileo on the other hand is shown to be quite eager to proclaim his universal causality theory for all true causes. Galileo's explanations seem to have improved over his predecessors (Aristotle), however in hindsight specific lacunas or flaws can now be identified. However it goes to Galileo's credit to have improved thinking from set compartmentalized way into what he believed to better and truer explanation.
Galileo believed that the phenomenon of tides was the principle proof that the Earth moved. He set out to prove his theory by postulating that an appropriate model could largely reproduce the effect of the tides, whereas other causes (of the tides) that were promulgated at that time could not produce the desired effect. Galileo can be credited with laying seeds of scientific analysis and being able to study
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Galileo's Interventionist Notion of Cause Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1500492-galileos-interventionist-notion-of-cause
(Galileo'S Interventionist Notion of Cause Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Galileo'S Interventionist Notion of Cause Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1500492-galileos-interventionist-notion-of-cause.
It portrays achievement in matters of social or economic well being, the establishment of fairness, and a working political order that caters for the true interests of everybody. International relations teach that peace means the absence of war or conflict, together with the existence of cultural and economic understanding.
Toward this end, the focus of this discussion will be directed toward understanding the notion of belief in connection with what the author of Epistemology by Robert Audi (2003) this book claims about the argument from ‘acquaintance’ argument, and in turn, the argument which maintains that perception is a form of knowledge, although indefensible as a form of valid knowledge.
These cultural practices are learnt through social interactions within an organization, and this definition emanates from the view that culture is a social phenomenon. All the practices within an organization are as a result of social interactions. Therefore, the organization work culture can be created in that; it does not subsist on its own.
This means that, for Locke, money is a good method of exchange because money does not decay unlike good like flesh or corn. This also means that money has value and it is a permanent way to determine value because it does not decay. Locke also believes that money is a means of assigning value to one’s property or possessions.
Galileo, in his letter to the Grand Duchess Christina, talks of the need to place science and religion in separate positions. He argues for separate positions for these owing to the separate functions that they fulfill in society and in the life of a common man.
In the midst of barbarian invasion, plagues, famines, and other calamities which constituted most of the events of the period, the Roman Catholic officials all the more adhered to the religious principles and merely qualified schools of thoughts that consist of knowledge aligned with the views of Christian faith.
Pain and suffering are inevitable parts of human life. With this reality, man begins to question: How can life have meaning Can man find meaning in suffering
For Frankl, it does not matter what man expects from life rather what life expects from man. This would mean that the meaning of life does not come from the situations that life gives but it comes from how man responds to each and every situation.
Mill’s humanistic assertion “Do no harm” challenges Marx’s apocalyptic call to overthrow bourgeois culture by establishing the integrity of the individual. Thus, Marx and Mill cannot be reconciled, even if one finds abundant evidence in George
This was the case when Galileo Galilei entertained further studies on celestial bodies, which he initiated in during the time when he published his first astronomy pamphlet, the Siderius Nuncius, also known as The Sidereal Messenger in English translations. The
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Galileo's Interventionist Notion of Cause for FREE!