Download file to see previous pages...
After much contemplation, analysis and evaluation it came to my attention that NCO regard in the military and in the face of the public has decreased substantially. The solution lies in going back to what I now realize was a “full-spectrum” NCO system.
The first notable difference that is requisite for today’s NCO is the establishment of an institutional training that allows for 360-degree assessment (United States Department of the Army, 2012). This, in the past decade has degraded almost entirely. Various aspects of this profession seem to be having a lot of focus and attention whilst others seem to receive close to none. For instance, public perception has it that other than put up colorful ceremonies and carry on strenuous drills an NCO, for the most part, does nothing else. Perhaps it is because of this logic that these two areas focus on institutional preparation at the expense of other important elements. As in the previous era, NCO like all soldiers, were well rounded. This ensured that the attributes that they put out were desirable and valuable. They also need for a good balance in their emotional stability and output. Anybody that has been around long enough will attest to the fact that determination has been an important part of the stance of soldiers in previous days. This is because stance tells of personality. Regardless of how much technical knowledge one amasses, the endowment of the psychological and physiological aspects is equally significant. The current institutional training programs overlook this aspect of training.
In contrast to the period spanning a decade, I cannot help but notice the difference in the outlook of first line soldiers. It is important to highlight that first line soldiers bear responsibility for those falling behind them (Center for Army Leadership, 2008). First line soldiers should
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The military institution is made up several officers whose duties are to ensure that there is orderliness with within the rank of soldiers put under his control and that the structures and systems are well implemented
Typically, the NCO education and training includes management and leadership as well as combat and service-specific training. The roles of the NCOs within the army organization are defined by the vision they adopted and are grouped as either specific, implied or direct duties.
I. Introduction II. Strategic Decision Making A. Risk Evaluation, Assumption, and Aversion B. Strategic Leadership and Avoidance of Risk III. Emotion and Decision Making IV. Discussions and Conclusions A. Developing Strategic Military Leaders B. The Implications of Emotion for Leadership Decision Making Abstract Military leaders nowadays work in an intricate military and political context, and their decisions entail significant risk.
Although this occurs through a chain of command, independent thinking is crucial for maintaining discipline in the military. In this regard, the most important and fundamental technique required in military leadership is critical and imaginative thinking, decision making and problem resolution techniques.
The US, since the period of the First World War has maintained an active role in the world’s activities more so surrounding insecurity issues. In that regard, we see the US attacking Iraq over its unjustified invasion of Kuwait. The US government for this reason has incurred hefty expenses with the military constituting a significant chunk of the total national budget (Tan, n.d).
Fives Bases of Power in Communication- A Case of US Army
In the lives of several people, Army men, and civilians alike, are in the hands of the army leaders who have to ensure that they safeguard the lives of the people and carry forward missions. Utmost clarity of instructions and strategies is essential so that every soldier is clear on the expected target and his role in achieving it.
Thus, the very essence of army hinges on leadership qualities. Our changing times have been symbolic of the leadership traits and trends that dominate the choices we make and the changes we follow. The people who are able to not only possess the requisite traits, but also demonstrate these in trying times more than any other are true leaders.
In order to do this, they continue to work and study to improve their leadership skills.
According to Concepts of Leadership, Clark defined leadership as "a process by which a person influences others to accomplish an objective and directs the organization in a way that makes it more cohesive and coherent." Throughout this process, leaders apply their leadership aspects such as beliefs, values, ethics, character, knowledge, and skills.