CBRN Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear Weapons - Essay Example

Most of the world nations with these weapons know that they are dealing with the most deadly weapon. Still, the control and access to these weapons, especially in the nations with less democracy, is a threat to the world nations.

So, the nations authorize their political heads to take control of this type of deadly weapon. In the modern context, political instability is a serious problem because one cannot expect an unstable state to be responsible for humanity. Radiological weapons: Compared with nuclear weapons, radiological weapons are with less capacity to create severe damage. To be specific, this sort of weapon is generally used to create chaos among the mass. Within this scenario, world nations suspect that notorious terrorist organizations may make use of this weapon to intimidate humanity.

For instance, the Padilla case (2002) proves that terrorist groups have a worldwide network and are strong enough to use radiological weapons. To be specific, the government suspected that Padilla may involve in jihad because he is trained to handle radiological weapons. Besides, this person is closely related to the leadership within Al-Qaeda. So, the Padilla case proves that terrorist groups may make use of civilians to handle radioactive weapons.

So, one can see that economic capability is not a serious problem for terrorist organizations. On the other side, the former satellite nations related to Russia (USSR) may have weapons (say, nuclear) and terrorist organizations can easily influence these nations.

Besides, the terrorist organizations make use of religious ideology to attract individuals who live in the U.S. and other western nations. Mendelsohn (2009) states, “A Qaeda has never disguised its desire to acquire weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear capabilities” (p.77). So, I rate the threat of radiological weapons as high risk because there are so many organizations affiliated with Al-Qaeda, aiming to threaten the whole world. The mainstream media provided ample importance to the past of the accused person (say, Padilla) because the same was a sensational news item for them.

Wingard (2013) states, “For the liberal media, Padilla was a clear example of these breaches of the rights of citizens” (p.84). On the other side, liberal media provide importance to the problems faced by the accused person. Still, both these approaches are partially wrong because the influence of terrorism-based on religious fundamentalism is unimaginable. When the world nations suspect that terrorist organizations are trying to gain easier access to deadly weapons, the argument on individual rights is invalid.