Piracy, Creativity and Infrastructure: Rethinking Access to Culture by Liang - Article Example

First Number Counterargument on Media Piracy (For or Against) INTRODUCTION The un ized use of thecreativity, innovations, productions, or conceptions of others, which signifies the violation of copyrights, is termed as piracy. This piracy is considerably notable in music and motion pictures in the modern day. It is arguable that media piracy leads to significant financial loss to the media owner. Correspondingly, it also affects the recognition of the media owner (Karaganis 1). The objective of the current study is to highlight the arguments, which are in against of media piracy. In this regard, the articles “Piracy, Creativity and Infrastructure: Rethinking Access to Culture” by Liang and “Laws that Choke Creativity” by Lessig are significantly considered throughout the paper. DISCUSSION The article “Piracy, Creativity and Infrastructure: Rethinking Access to Culture” by Liang suggested that media piracy had evolved as one of the major issues in media organisations in the present day context. In this regard, it is arguable that media piracy had affected public creativity and innovations. It significantly discourages the innovators, creators, or composers of media contents. This significantly affects the society, as it impacts media creations and innovations negatively. Moreover, the article of “Piracy, Creativity and Infrastructure: Rethinking Access to Culture” by Liang also implied that media piracy significantly causes anxieties among the individuals, who are engaged in media professions. The media professionals, because of piracy and copyright infringement panic regarding the consequent loss of their job. The similar anxiety is also notable among the investors of media groups, who fears of financial losses for their investment. Furthermore, the creator or composer of the media contents also witnesses a considerable financial loss. Besides these, in the article of “Piracy, Creativity and Infrastructure: Rethinking Access to Culture” by Liang it is also argued that the piracy of social media affects the recognition of the innovators or composers. The reason behind this is that the pirated media contents generally do not contain the identity of the original creators. In several instances, the pirated media contents replace the identity of the original creator to the offensive pirates. This eventually, discourages the original creator of the media contents to innovate further any media contents (Liang, “Piracy, Creativity and Infrastructure: Rethinking Access to Culture”). In similar notion, the article “Laws that Choke Creativity” by Lessig conveyed that media piracy affects the social culture among the people in a community. The social culture in several regions of the world teaches us to praise creativity in media contents. This commendation of media contents is significantly notable from centuries across the world. Notably, this aspect has encouraged individuals to participate in media content innovations. However, based on “Laws that Choke Creativity” by Lessig it can be depicted that increased piracy in media contents has significantly affected the social culture in the current day context. This is witnessed by the increasing tendency of the younger generation people to violate copyright laws. This eventually influences such individuals to conduct other activities that imply violation of laws (Lessig, “Laws that Choke Creativity”). The article “Laws that Choke Creativity” by Lessig arguably suggested that the implementation of laws against media piracy had been in a passive stage. The laws are prepared against such offensive activities, but it lacks effective implementation. In such societies, majority of the individuals are unaware of these laws. Moreover, there are evidences that the regional administrations are incapable of undertaking necessary steps. This has encouraged public to conduct media piracy. Besides this, based on “Laws that Choke Creativity” by Lessig it is also suggested that there are several nations those have not implemented laws regarding the prohibition of media piracy. This is largely because of the lack in effective decision making in the legislatures of these nations. Eventually, it significantly affected the creators of media contents in such nations. The arguments in the article “Laws that Choke Creativity” by Lessig also suggest that the lack of laws regarding media piracy, not only affects the media professionals of the respective nation, but also in other foreign nations. In this regard, it is arguable that the lack of effective laws against media piracy do not protects the media contents produced in foreign nations. Thus, it is highly decisive to implement media piracy laws on international basis (Lessig, “Laws that Choke Creativity”). The arguments of the articles “Piracy, Creativity and Infrastructure: Rethinking Access to Culture” by Liang and “Laws that Choke Creativity” by Lessig suggests that media content piracy is an illegal practice as considered by the laws of several nations. The reason behind this is that such activities are considered as a corruptive practice in several nations. The practice significantly harms the innovators of the media contents. In several nations infringement of media contents leads to monetary penalty of the offensive individual. In some nations, laws suggests of imprisonment of the guilty. Thus, this aspect supports the arguments against media content piracy (Karaganis 1). The articles, “Piracy, Creativity and Infrastructure: Rethinking Access to Culture” by Liang and “Laws that Choke Creativity” by Lessig implies of another disadvantage. These articles suggest that such attempts are very risky in nature. It is notable that the pirated media contents often contain viruses and other malicious objects. These significantly affect the devices of the user. Moreover, it affects the information security of the user. This is considered as one of the disadvantage of piracy, which supports the arguments against piracy (Karaganis 1). The arguments of the article “Piracy, Creativity and Infrastructure: Rethinking Access to Culture” by Liang and “Laws that Choke Creativity” by Lessig also imply of another major disadvantage of media piracy that significantly supports arguments against media content piracy. In this regard, it is notable that the media pirated contents do not have the technical support from the original innovator or creator of the contents. This significantly discourages the users of the pirated contents. It is eminent that the lack of technical support to the users of the media contents significantly affects the users in effective usage of the service. This also restricts the users to avail the support from the technical team of the original creators of such media contents. It is notable that there are certain pirated media contents those do not possess manuals or users guide. This significantly discourages such pirated users. These suggest of a major disadvantage of the pirated media contents. Such disadvantages of pirated media contents also implies of the arguments that are against media content piracy (Karaganis 1). Based on the articles “Piracy, Creativity and Infrastructure: Rethinking Access to Culture” by Liang and “Laws that Choke Creativity” by Lessig, another decisive implications can be drawn. This implication is regarding the economy of a nation or region. Through the creativity and innovations on media contents, several nations and regions earns significant monetary benefit. This acts as a source of national or regional income. However, the unauthorized production of such media contents by other nations leads to the economic loss of the nations; those are the original innovators of such media contents. Thus, it is one of the most compelling arguments against the piracy of media contents (Karaganis 1). CONCLUSION In the course of the study there are several arguments, which are against piracy of media contents. In this regard, the study revealed of some of the major arguments, wherein one of such suggests that media content piracy leads to a significant impact on the creators. It affects their recognition and considerably affects in monetary terms. Moreover, the investors and other professionals engaged in media products are also affected. On a wider context, it also affects the economy of a nation or a region. Besides these, media piracy largely affects the users. Thus, the compelling arguments against media piracy suggest of the need for effective implementation media-piracy laws. This would strive towards attaining fairer business environment. Works Cited Karaganis, Joe. Media Piracy in Emerging Economies. Lulu.com. 2011. Print. Lessig, Larry. “Laws that Choke Creativity.” You Tube. 2007. Web. 12 Apr. 2015. Liang, Lawrence. “Piracy, Creativity and Infrastructure: Rethinking Access to Culture.” Social Science and Research Network. 2009. Web. 12 Apr. 2015. Read More