Features of Process of Strategic Planning - Essay Example

Running head: STRATEGIC PLANNING Strategic Planning October 2008 How often have you heard it said that planning is waste of time? No sooner is the plan completed than someone comes along to change it. These same naysayers would also argue that the plan, once completed is disregarded and merely put on the shelf so the team can get down to doing some real work. To people management, we mean the planning activity that involves deciding on the types of people in form of resources that are required to fulfill the requirements of the project. In other words the types of skills and number of workers we need to complete the project (kwysocki, 1997). This paper explains the strategic planning, its effectiveness for organization decision making and resource management. This explanation will be started with the definition of the strategic planning and its basic effectiveness. Strategic planning is other than making it sure your connection will stay financially sound and enable to uphold its assets, it’s projecting where your involvement anticipates being in 5, 10, or 15 years, and how your alliance will obtain there. It is a systematic planning procedure connecting a size of steps that recognize the present position of the organization, including its task, idea for the opportunity, in service values, requirements, aims, prioritized events and approaches, action plans, and observing plans. Strategic planning decides where an organization is leaving over the subsequently year or additional and how its going to obtain there (John & Richard, 2002). Normally, the procedure is organization wide or paying attention on a main purpose such as a partition, department or other main function. (Cleland et al, 2002) This part of the paper explains how the Strategic Planning differs from the Long-term Planning and other planning. The though a lot of exercise these conditions interchangeably, strategic planning and long-term planning could be different in their importance on the "definite" situation (John & Richard, 2002). Long-term planning is usually measured to denote the improvement of a plan for achieving an objective or set of aims over a period of numerous years, with the supposition that present knowledge about prospect circumstances is satisfactorily dependable to make sure the plans dependability over the period of its completion. In the late 50’s and early on 60’s, for instance, the financial system of United States was comparatively steady and rather unsurprising, and, so, long term planning was both fashionable and helpful (Clark et al, 1991). On the other hand, strategic planning makes assumption that an organization must be responsive to a dynamic, changing environment (not the more constant situation can be taken as consumption for long-range planning). Certainly a common assumption has emerged in the nonprofit sector that the environment is indeed changeable, often in unpredictable ways. Strategic planning, then, stresses the importance of making decisions that will ensure the organizations ability to successfully respond to changes in the environment (Clark et al, 1991). The Strategic planning is the underpinning of each frequent awareness society (John & Richard, 2002). With no strategic planning, the society will by no means know where it is leaving; much fewer know if it still got there. A significant idea of strategic planning is an accepting that in order for the population to grow, everybody wants to work to make sure the team’s objectives are met. Team associates incorporates all connection homeowners, the board of executives, professional management, whether onsite or from side to side a management corporation, and a multiplicity of service professionals such as accountants and set aside professionals (Clark et al, 1991). The team wants to effort as a communal body to be flourishing. Part of the team thought is the institution of positions for the team players. Teams frequently achieve deficiently if everybody or no one is annoying to be the quarterback. This part of the paper provides the three factors regarding strategic planning for organization prospective. These factors are Vision, mission and values of strategic planning. Vision: describes the desired or planned outlook condition of a strict organization or project in conditions of its basic objective and/or strategic trend. Mission describes the most important reason of an organization or a venture, in effect telling why it survives. Viewpoint of Values are communal amongst the stakeholders of an association. Values drive a businesss atmosphere and precedence. A basic view of the strategic planning procedure is exposed by the following diagram Kenneth (1997): The Strategic Planning procedure This part of the paper will explain the process and technique by which the planner creates actionable goals and how a planner goes about the process of identifying strengths, weaknesses, and distinctive competencies in an organization. These goals are brought about by process of action plane that is able to comprise conducting a number of sort of scrutinize, or review, of the organizations atmosphere (for instance, of the political, community, financial and technical atmosphere). Planners cautiously believe a variety of motivating forces in the atmosphere, for instance, growing antagonism, varying demographics, etc. Planners as well look at the variety of forces, faults, occasions and intimidation (a contraction for this commotion is SWOT) concerning the organization (Cleland et al, 2002). The paper has explained the process and technique by which we can identify strengths and minimize the threats. We perform a needed assessment procedure. Decide the wants of the association by investigating the up to date condition of the society, addressing any serious issues, and recognizing the association’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and intimidation (Dougherty et al, 1996). We can settle on critical concerns for our project. List the serious matters faced by the organization that must be addressed for the connection to accomplish its mission and vision, foundation on an evaluation of its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (Kenneth, 1997). We have an Assessment process for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that are also known as SWOT analysis. Strengths that provide a list of the organizational characteristics that encourage the association’s aptitude to convene its mission and vision. Weaknesses catalog those organizational characteristics that obstruct the association’s capacity to meet its mission and vision. A number of instances comprise insufficient technology or employ of technology, be short of core competence training, deprived service, and so forth. Opportunities: record those issues, interior and outside, that would facilitate the association to convene its assignment and vision. A few examples comprise technological go forward in desirable region, consolidating purposes, etc. (Dougherty et al, 1996). Planners cautiously approach to results about what the business have to do as an outcome of the main matters and chances facing the organization. These outcomes comprise what in general activities or strategic goals the organization should attain, and in general technique or strategies to attain the activities. Objectives should be intended and worded as a great deal as probable to be exact, quantifiable, satisfactory to those operational to attain the objectives, sensible, appropriate, expanding the abilities of those are functioning to accomplish the aims, and satisfying to them, as well. Few people take this broad look about after theyve recognized or efficient their task report, vision report, values report, etc. These reports are momentarily explained below. Other people accomplish the analysis before evaluation the proclamation. (Note that in the earlier periods, organizations typically referred to the steps "long-range planning". further newly, planners make use of the steps "strategic planning". This novel expression is destined to imprison the plan (inclusive, considerate, well-placed) nature of this kind of planning.) This part of the paper will explain the how Planning can lead to organizational change. Just as there are a variety of forces motivating change, so there are extensively diverse kinds of change. It is state that when one inspects case narrations of organizational change it is noticeable that there are significant dissimilarities in the scale of the change which takes place in accumulation to dissimilarities in the time-scale over which organizational change is raise. These lines illustrate the diverse kinds of change which are intrinsic in the information atmosphere. The ensuing sub-problem will as well be tackles, namely “in which kinds can change be catalog”? The kinds of change are drawn as follows: At a number of spots in the strategic planning procedure (from time to time in the action of situation the planned direction), planners characteristically make out or inform what might be called the strategic "philosophy". This comprises recognizing or informing the organizations task, vision and/or values statements (Dougherty et al, 1996). This part of the paper will explain the mission statements. Here it is also discussed the importance of mission statement for the strategic planning. Mission statements are summarizing metaphors of the reason of the organization. Mission statements differ in environment from extremely brief to fairly inclusive, and plus having an exact reason statement that is fraction of the in general assignment statement. Many groups believe the values statement and vision statement to be fraction of the mission statement. Novel organizations those are working for profit or non-profit, often work with a condition agency to officially register their novel business, for instance, as a corporation, relationship, etc. This registration typically comprises stated a mission statement in their agreement or establishment, editorials of incorporation, etc. It appears that vision and worth’s statements are more and more engaged. Vision statements are normally a dynamic description of how the business will or should function at a number of spot in the prospect and of how clients or clients are benefiting from the organizations goods and services. Values statements record the generally main concerns in how the organization will function. A few numbers of people spotlight the values report on moral values. Moral values are principles that propose in general precedence in how people have to to precede in the world, for instance, veracity, sincerity, esteem, etc. Other people comprise operational principles which propose in general main concerns for the business, for instance, to expand market share, increase competence, etc. (Some people would maintain that these operational principles are actually strategic objectives (Dougherty et al, 1996). This part of the paper will explain the planned changes inside the organization and their relationship with other process, planned change reproduce a practical planning form. It is designed and applied in an arranged and timely style in anticipation of prospect events. It is frequently utilized when change in the venture is to be wide and lengthy. As such, it needs a greater promise of time and assets as well as additional knowledge in formulating and applying the change. However, proactive change does not take place frequently for the following two reasons: Enterprises infrequently have information systems which give a hand to inform them where they are heading as distinct from classification where they have been. When equipment comes into view to be going healthy and enterprises are rewarding it is exceptionally hard to get people eager about change, because they cannot see the cause for it. Now this paper presents the unplanned change for the organization prospective. It is refer to unplanned change as superficial change. According to them, surface changes, which participates a necessary position in business, must not at all be looked upon as minor changes or changes of lesser importance (Dougherty et al, 1996). These changes might manipulate some feature of the business - strategy, structure, society, management method and typically distress systems are the ideal explanation for businesses which necessitate mounting incessantly in order to answer to a fluid environment additionally, worldwide growth of marketplace representation businesses to more recurrent opposition. In this esteem, it states that a business which is not a obvious head in its market have to repeatedly act in response to its competitors’ attacks by escalating its goods, humanizing its logistics, minimizing delivery times or modifying prices. This is a feature of the profit-making business surroundings (Yang et al, 1997). In conclusion of the paper all the discussions are reviewed. Here during this we also set our Secondary goals; these goals are objectives to be achieved that lead to superior performance. For doing this all we have to conduct the External Analysis in which we can identify strategic opportunities and threats in the operating environment. The Internal Analysis is also necessary because it enables us to Identify strengths, Quality and quantity of resources accessible, distinctive competencies, recognize weaknesses, insufficient resources and also to we able to find the managerial and organizational deficits. This all happen by techniques that are called SWOT and Strategic Choice. In the SWOT analysis identifies Strengths and Weaknesses Opportunities and Threats regarding our projects. And in Strategic Choice we analyze the Business, Functional, Global, Corporate, Business-Level Strategies, and Cost leadership related issues (Yang et al, 1997). References 1. Cleland D, Ireland L. (2002). Project management: strategic design and implementation. 4th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. 2. Dougherty D, Hardy C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Strategic Manage J ;39(5):1120–53. 3. K.-K. Yang, C.-C. Sum. (1997). An evaluation of due date, resource allocation, project release, and activity scheduling rules in a multiproject environment, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 103 :139–154. 4. Kenneth C. Laudon. (1998) Management Information System Sixth Edition. New York. Addison Wesley Publishing Company. 5. kwysocki, (1997). Effective Project Management. McGRAW Hill 6. Clark K, Fujimoto T. (1991). Product development performance. Strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 7. John A. Pearce & Richard B. Robinson. (2002). Strategic Management. McGraw-Hill. 8. Retrieved on October 7, 2008, Retrieved from: http://wikipedia.com Read More