Strategic IMC Measurement in the 21st Century - Essay Example

? Strategic IMC Measurement in the 21st Century Strategic IMC Measurement in the 21st Century IMC estimation in the 21st Century is not an adventure for the timid due to the obstacles an organization can be faced with. This paper attempts to discuss this assertion while using examples of industries to support this argument. As we know, the purpose of IMC measurement is to maximize the profitability of a business. It is a recurring process requiring frequent communication between an audiology practice and its target markets. IMC works to fuel profitable relationships. The notion of a profitable relationship entails the benefit and profit of the involved parties. However, since IMC measurement is not a walk in the park, in this paper, there is also some advice on how to prevail over obstacles faced by various industries and we will understand why IMC measurement is actually not fit for those who are faint hearted in the twenty-first century industries (Ewing, 2009). The findings correspond with the following stages of overcoming these obstacles: • Carrying out market research aimed at better understanding the customers • Comprehending the viewpoints, incentive and individual client behavior • Concentrating on the client instead of the line of the product • Insisting on the consumer officer role to achieve maximum value of the customer. These four stages show that an IMC arrange should enthusiastically control from the contact focus that every industry has with its clients. Lately however, the conditions of shifting demographics and socio graphics coupled with the rapid expansion of choices of media have made the old forms incapable. These barriers have actually adversely affected industries. Thus, IMC scientists have saw a need to recognize the call for additional muddled, conduct orientated division guidelines to counter these snags. In the wake of categorizing the clients into sections, underwriting exercises ought to be set up to make it work as per the whole vital IMC arrange to perform the set advertising conveyance goals. Conveyance between clients and conglomerations ought to be a two-way process; either as an exchange or a trade of qualified data (Binet & Field, 2007). IMC measurements also promote the use of various messages in a campaign or advertisement so as to reach various target audiences. This is mostly used when an industry intends to advertise its brand name while encompassing various aspects. This is most evident in the media industry. The importance of this is mostly evident in the IMC literature. Also, we can take the good demonstration of the banking industry which has utilized it in measuring IMC at the strategic level. However, limited information is there regarding the execution of IMC or the strategic use of various tools of communication. However, it is unknown that if an IMC approach is adopted at a global industrial level or if respective industries come up with and apply their own IMC measurement approach, then that could be very beneficial (Binet & Field, 2008). Barriers to IMC Many researchers have noted and have been dealing with barriers to the implementation of IMC as well as its use. The following is a summary of some of the barriers and the subsequent paragraphs discuss these barriers. • The skills of a client skills, centralization, and issues pertaining culture • The skill of the firm • The flexibility related issues • The difficulties of IMC related measurement • The absence of business related culture •Vague corporate level positioning • Varying cultures within departments for communication • Necessity for managerial techniques that are cross disciplinary • Change fear • Hierarchical structure of the organization • The fragmentation in media IMC must be able to keep on demonstrating how their blend with nontraditional media produces more impact with less cost. There is also the mind-set – this pertains to experience, tradition, history and specialization. IMC estimation involves the entire association, starting with the CEO coursing through the modern conglomeration. It is ideal for the corporate targets to underpin the publicizing destinations and vice versa. Provided that just the strategic level appropriates duty that basically includes the showcasing capacities, the corporate level, for instance the senior administrators, will probable be unsuccessful in being as devoted to the project as they should be since they won't be included straight with the usage of IMC. In this manner, one may not distinguish the points of interest of applying an IMC approach as a vital process. The media business has had the capacity to effectually apply this. Additionally, in spite of the fact that IMC should begin at the senior level, research has demonstrated that this is an uncommon event. Throughout the organization, senior managers are supposed to apply IMC procedures (Clow & Baack, 2010). The factors that are closely related to the senior management can effectively be sub-divided into the following: a.) Top management commitment in IMC implementation which has been identified as one of the features that most influence IMC measurement management as a business process. Top management commitment means that senior managers ensure that what they say and what they do is coherent so as to avoid ambiguous perception by middle managers, which can result in the damage of desired integration. Unlike senior managers, communication managers lose their primary focus generally due to lack of commitment (Collett and Fenton, 2011). b.) The senior management should definitely have the will power to alter corporate policies to allow IMC implementation in order to have a positive influence. c.) IMC application is positively influenced by risk aversion/tolerance. The top administration needs to expect the characteristic hazard in the following of dynamic altering markets for the acclimatization of this thought. A large number of IMC authors and scholars regard this antecedent as a structural issue, or having a relation to the top management and formal responsibility. There is also an emphasis for the need to control the entire marketing communication process from a central location which in a global context is even more important. This communication management system, which is based on centralization and control, permits the setting and keeping of a customer based orientation. There are also factors which are related to the inter-departmental dynamics that can be specified in: a.) Market and brand orientation. There are empirical studies which have discovered that there is a positive big influence of brand orientation regarding the levels IMC measurement should adopt. Likewise, there is a reciprocal affection of each of these factors. b.) Qualification, experience and abilities-it has been affirmed that management abilities that are cross functional are a major barrier for the implementation of IMC. It has also been stated that the incapability of managers of external agencies and of client-businesses in finding trained and expert human resources required for IMC programs’ implementation is amongst the main obstacles to a successful IMC application. c.) Cross-functional management---This is regarded as the most essential organizational factor. It is with no doubt that difficulty is in the adoption of cross-functional effective teams. The separate areas of marketing and human resource are required to work more closely together to make strong corporate equity with brand customers improving the return for HR. This only happens if the senior management is committed to remove departmental silos (De Mooij, 2010). IMC make the most of traditional promotional elements but at the same time, it is also compelled to go beyond. This directs to the recognition essentiality of the nontraditional marketing forms which include SMS and the internet (Chat rooms). Communication industries have utilized these avenues as is evident with mobile phone companies in the communication industry, thus retaining their market share and maintaining their relevance (Du Plessis, 2005). Marketing practitioners in particular, can interpret the IMC concept not as precondition of company development but to a certain extent as a one-dimensional approval for an additional office to make a simple benefit. Thus, owing to mounting force from customers and declining showcasing plans, industries should utilize the fact that advertising agencies can take this chance to exploit the IMC concept so as to embrace more promotional blend components in their capacities, which could perhaps bring about additional benefits for the industry. This is how some of the advertising industry manages to stay in business. As a result, practitioners should realize that IMC measurement can not only operate in support of the agency, but also the organization (Hallward, 2008). Commercial enterprises ought not to just see the firm as the last result for its issues, rather as a mix of specialist and conveyance master, working to its points and objective. The pattern to specialization in the twenty-first century speaks for an additional boundary. We can take the example of a client-organization which may simultaneously use straightforwardly agencies for marketing, advertising and for packaging. It is evident that a large number of particular offices have been produced, for example announcement bureaus, promoting and PR. However, that what the customers truly need is reconciliation, which is more efficient through proper application of IMC measurement. Moreover, such specialty may be in existence within the client’s industrial organization, which is the different marketing communication functions that are separated from each other. Moreover, the individual tasks within a department can again be divided into minor fragments that may limit the success of this IMC program. The division of departments could fragment the tasks of employees as well as presenting a physical barrier, therefore thwarting this IMC approach. Here, the problem that should be overcome by industries is how to successfully associate the different departments and functions together so as to start communicating and become integrated (Heath, 2009). In most industries, their structures are unfit for IMC implementation. This is because the process of integration, which necessitates both horizontal and vertical communication has not be appropriately followed, creating a state of affair that often causes confusion, bringing about conflicts among the employees and their functions as well as tasks. There needs to be a securing of communication across strategic business units, brands and departments, and also from senior managers to brand managers. This can only be acquired through an open-minded business culture. IMC measurement has the potential to direct industry employees to a sacrifice of power, and as a result causing disputes among them due to fears arising over the deprivation of authority and control. Since the implementation and application of outcomes which would arise after ‘full integration’ is yet to be taken up in the IMC, creating a fear by employees regarding the reduction of their status or in a worse scenario, the loss of their positions. The most difficult challenge to this IMC program implementation is usually represented by the coordination of various tasks (Kimmel, 2010). Poor development of database, short-term planning, ‘‘inside-out’ communication conflicts and task fragmentation can be caused as a result of improving the conveyance technique which is dependent upon the item, then working to the client. Most industries are faced with IMC program implementation difficulties due to their historical background of their constituent organization as well as their traditions and experience. First of all, in most cases, its specific structure is satisfactory, hence the impression that the need for change is not necessary. However, if this state of affairs continues with no change, the result may be the loss of a company’s market position (Kitchen, Kim, & Schultz, 2008). Cross-functional activities should be designed so as to overcome barriers, leaving behind conflicts in authority, thus creating employee team spirit. The organization could come up with the post of a head of communication, who will be vested with the responsibility for implementation since it is a customary rehearse inside shopper conglomerations to designate one individual to organize all major correspondence exercises. Restructuring the organization as a whole with completely new departments may be good, although only in drastic circumstances, so as to attain effective results, which was supposed to ease IMC measurement in the twenty-first century. However, this hasn’t been the real case and it’s evident that indeed this is not a journey for the hopeless ones. This might be because the existing information about how IMC can assist in overcoming communication problems is scanty (Moses & Plummer, 2008). IMC measurement is usually seen as a technique belonging to marketers whereas PR people might view it as a restrictive approach, where one has to assert himself since marketing does not incorporate all PR functions. Therefore, industries should be able to deal with this, which is not an easy fate. This may be because the components of IMC tend to be viewed by PR professionals as an endeavor to carry PR under the umbrella of promoting. An imposing number of promoting offices utilize IMC estimation to fuse PR as a result of the diminishing customer budgets. The prevailing contention advance is that showcasing is generally seen principally as a capacity serving the client as a stakeholder. The combination of the PR and marketing communication functions is ideal. Therefore, the difficulties faced while combining the functions of the two can be viewed as barriers. Along these lines, not advertising or PR experts concoct last conclusions. Subsequent to notwithstanding the imposing measure of speculating, there is still small tackle IMC (Moses & Plummer, 2008). However, since the beginning of the 21st century, the nature of change in communication is undeniable. Today’s industry has had to heavily invest in IMC hiring the best qualified marketing communication practitioners at hefty salaries, so as to be better placed in the utilization of these new forms of modern communication like the internet, which have been having major impact on mostly various sectors. The IMC concept has resulted due to these changes, although there have been attempts by practitioners to organize and put together mix elements of marketing communication. IMC as a strategic process of business focuses on brand in a lifelong viewpoint. Quality and administration of client relationship is a result of the early twenty-first century. With the aforementioned updates incident in an ever widening margin worldwide milieu of business rivalry, the reception of an IMC approach all through an association appears to be vital for supported victory, and attained just by the solid willed (Moses & Plummer, 2008). Conclusion There is a small question that IMC estimation is in an ever widening margin, getting essential in the twenty-first century. Innovation has made incorporation conceivable, and IMC projects have as of recently been consumed by different conglomerations, for example Fedex and Dell. Around the points of IMC estimation is to structure synergy around the different promoting components in order to accomplish both short-and lifelong returns. Consistency and better exploitation of the media and promotional mix elements are among the other benefits of an IMC approach. This article has also touched on past IMC studies and also its critiques. This discussion mostly has concentrated on IMC estimation based on the twenty-first century, incorporating industrial examples. References Binet, L., & Field, P., 2007. The pursuit of effectiveness. Market Leader, 39 WARC. Binet, L., & Field, P., 2008. Measurement in the Era of Accountability IPA dataMINE. Marketing in the Era of Accountability, pp. 77-102. Clow, K. E., & Baack, D., 2010. Integrated Advertising, Promotion, & Marketing Communications. New York: Prentice Hall. Collett, P., and Fenton, W., 2011. The Sponsorship Handbook. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. De Mooij, M., 2010. Global Marketing and Advertising Understanding Cultural Paradoxes. London: Sage. Du Plessis, E., 2005. The Advertised Mind. London: Millward Brown and Kogan Page Ltd. Ewing, M.T., 2009. Integrated marketing communications measurement and evaluation. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15 (2–3), pp. 103–117. Hallward, J., 2008. Make Measurable What Is Not So”: Consumer Mix Modeling for the Evolving Media World. Journal of Advertising Research, 48 (3), pp. 339-351 Heath, R., 2009. Emotional Engagement: How Television Builds Big Brands at Low Attention. Journal of Advertising Research, 49 (1), pp. 62-73. Kimmel, A. J., 2010. Connecting with customers: marketing for new marketplace realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kitchen, P. J., Kim, I., and Schultz, D. E., 2008. Integrated Marketing Communications: Practice Leads Theory. Journal of Advertising Research, 48 (4), pp. 531-546. Moses, E., and Plummer, J., 2008. Bio-sensory metrics can deliver advertising insights. Admap, 497, pp. 41-44. Read More