Control projects, capital management, risk management and evaluation - Essay Example

inciple of using this technique concept was used as a tool towards initiatives of standardisation and certification of OHSM systems that complied with the Australian and International standards. In Australia, harmonised occupational health and safety in all States was introduced with the Act and Regulations coming into force in 2012. Under the Act, an employer has an obligation to ensure the health and safety of each of the employer’s workers at work and of others who may be adversely affected by the work being undertaken, including the working environment, systems of work, plant, and substances.

The employer must provide information, instruction, training and supervision. In addition an employer needs to monitor the health and safety of employees, manage information, and records relating to work-related injuries. There are also provisions relating to consultation with workers, according to Hopkins (2005) workplace safety requires employers to maintain a safe workplace, so far as reasonably practicable in the language to reduce risks to a level that is as low as reasonably practicable.

This approach according to Hopkins (2005) was recommended in the Robens report in 1972, with the Robens conjecture being adopted in many jurisdictions. This paper has addressed the requirements of WBL 8020 (2) units. Beginning with an introduction of the developments of the standard 1 Boral OHSM with reference to the implementation of the concept of a conceptual framework that outlines and presents a preferred method in categorising risk strategically and objectively in business activities. The core elements of the system have been introduced in the (Appendix power point), with the concept of the system being discussed.

This paper has addressed some of the preconditions for successful. The purpose of this paper is to examine courses of actions and implementation in a conceptual framework that outlines and presents a preferred approach in categorising risk strategically and objectively in our organisational enterprise activities. This paper will venture in constructing a reflective consciousness of the existing risk measures taken when developing and implementations of the strategy process of endorsing our company moving to a single Health and Safety System that will provide a standardised robust HSE system that can be embedded at all National BCM Boral operational sites and offices.

The project was to develop one safety management system throughout the Company nationally. The strategy piloted 5 different sites incorporating the BCM business units of the Company (Asphalt, Quarries, Concrete and Logistics) in New South Wales incorporating all business units of BCM Boral operations of the company, determining how safety is managed throughout the business. Feedback was required from personnel from these sites to make necessary changes to the system. The implementation of a National safety management system was undertaken in four phases that was used as an outline for evaluating the effectiveness of project implementation.

• Phase one (1) involved planning of OHS National Safety management system. • Phase two (2) focused on reactive safety management processes. • Phase three (3) focused on predictive and proactive safety management processes. • Phase four (4) focused on operational safety assurance.