Monitoring System in IKEA - Essay Example

Running Head: Monitoring System (IKEA) Name : xxxxxxxxxxx Institution : xxxxxxxxxxx Title : Monitoring System (IKEA) Date : xxxxxxxxxxx 2010 Monitoring System (IKEA) IKEA being a Swedish company was founded in 1943.It is a retail store with 160 stores located in 30 countries. That purely means it is global. IKEA is also a business viewpoint that offer wide assortment of home furnishing with good design and function at prices that many populace will be able to afford. IKEA itself operates most of its stores. Though, most stores are operated under the charter model. One of the franchise model stores is founded in the Asia pacific region which is Hong Kong. It started as a business in 1975. Jardine pacific acquired the franchise in 1988. Since then it has expanded the commerce in so many ways thus it renovates new stores and operates them. This means IKEA has been made the leader in the furnishing industry. In Hong Kong IKEA operates four stores in different location namely, Shatin, Causeway bay, Mongkok and Tsuen wan. In Sheung Shui there is a warehouse. It offers a furniture pickup services for customers who purchase at the stereo most stores are founded near the MTR, KCR stations and most stress located in the shopping centre’s where they provide easy and convenient access to customers. Monitoring protocol is a dangerous component of quality assurance in a well developed field – tested for any monitoring programme. The policy, procedures, and systematic actions established for the purpose of providing and maintaining a specified scale of confidence in statistics honor and accuracy throughout the lifecycle of the data, which includes contribution, update, manipulation, and output”. This is a key definition of quality assurance. The aim of monitoring is to detect and document change over time and scientifically detect document change over time (Miller2005). Scientifically detect is base on resource sampling. This is the use of consistent and exact repetitive method of collecting and recording data. It is therefore hard to observe changes within sample data due to the method used to obtain actual changes in the resource being monitored. It requires detailed monitoring protocols at the start of long –term monitoring project. (Bowersox 2002). Characteristics of an effective control system viz a vis IKEA: first A focus on stable points. For example, controls are applied where failure cannot be tolerated or where costs cannot exceed an assured amount. The critical points include all the areas of an organization's operations that directly affect the triumph of its key operations. Second, Integration into established processes in order to Gearshift must function discordantly within these processes and should not restrict access operations. Third is, Acceptance subsequently to human resources. Employee involvement in the design of controls can increase reception. Fourth, availability of information when needed, deadlines, time needed to complete the project, costs coupled with the project, and priority needs are apparent in these criteria. Costs are regularly endorsed to time shortcomings or failures. Fifth, Economic feasibility, effective control systems answer questions such as, "How much does it cost?" "What will it save?" or "What are the returns on the investment?" In short, comparison of the costs to the reimbursement ensures that the payback of controls outweigh the costs. In addition is the accuracy successful control systems provide factual information that's useful, reliable, valid, and constant. Last, Joystick must be simple and easy to be aware of issues affecting the IKEA (Lindgård 2001). Features of the IKEA system Currently it has 200 users, programme and services funded under the smoke-free Ontario strategy. Each program has established between10 and 50 presentation indicators, which apparent appearance the underpinning of both the MHP-required work plan and permanent monitoring. OTRU has aimed to develop system minimizes data entry work and provides data in timely and user friendly fashion. The features are as follows: PIMS can do away with performance procedures that are no longer needed and can add novel, trial as demands revolutionize, Users can easily engender indicator-based reports at any time, for any time epoch, The systems can widespread data for semi-annual and annual publicity, Each user receives schooling on data entry, work planning and report generation, Program Training and discussion Centre (PTCC) and PTCC also provides continuous technical (Torekull 2005). To improve way of PRSPs handling monitoring and indicators, two initial assumptions were made, Indicators being basic building blocks for evaluation and monitoring system are also part of the assessment. Playing crucial role of strategy formulation process provides the baseline for M&E needed during implementation. It helps answer key questions at various stages in the strategy i.e. where are we now, where do we want to go, are we taking the right path to get there and finally are we there yet? Indicators determine what, where and level of severity of the problem. It depends on availability of resources and the chosen strategy approach chosen It comes through comprehensive water resources requirement and availability or focused assessment target which is focused on specific problems identified earlier. Some of these indicators will feed into the monitoring and evaluation system. It provides a baseline against which to measure progress during implementation (Phillips 2005). Different examples of indicators: State indicators which refers to exemplify the state of the sheltered first-rate, the desired state of the circumstances for the stakeholder or the envisioned effect of the actions to be taken surrounded by the classification. Examples includes: Compliance with laws and international agreements and the licensee can display conformity with the national and local regulations and discharge any (administrative) obligations that arises (International Council for Science 2007). Second, Management rules or guideline, they tend to depict a sustainable or ecological sound fabrication process by unfolding the executive, measures, allowed or prohibited, and there performance. For example information on pesticides, nitrogen fertilizers that can be functional, soil plummeting corrosion. The major challenge is the definition of what is to be considered as ´good practice in the agricultural sector (IKEA. 2009). Third, Procedure description that refers to metaphors given understandable course of action on how a certain process has to be performed but do not focus on single measures except on the whole process chain. Examples are the Chain-of-custody description for instance (59) that guarantees traceability of a biomass. Fourth, labor contracts which mean the surroundings of employments, the employer’s rights, working time and remuneration can be precise. And lastly, formulation of statements-It is used for the description of criteria from the community and ecological sector. The formulation of a report is frequently used for criteria that cannot be portrayed in terms of ´rigid´ indicators. Conclusion, This being some of the few elaborated types indicators process it sets the stumbling block for the initial partaking in the arrangement lower and to gives organizations the likelihood to improve their schedule towards sustainability while participating in the various activities activity. References Bortone, S.A. (2005). Estuarine indicators. CRC Press. Bowersox, D. J. (2002). Supply chain logistics management. McGraw-Hill. IKEA. (2009). IKEA: kjøkken. IKEA Norge. International Council for Science. (2007). Sustainability indicators: a scientific assessment. Island Press. Janet, S.( 2009). Monitoring sustainable human development in Fiji, Volume 1Monitoring Sustainable Human Development in Fiji, Margaret Chung. United Nations Development Programme. Lindgård, R.( 2001). IKEA: en analyse av mulighetene for personalisering av IKEAs nettsider. R. Lindgård. http://www.ikea.no Miller, G. (2005). Monitoring for a sustainable tourism transition: the challenge of developing and using indicators. CABI. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Statistics, knowledge and policy: key indicators to inform decision making. OECD Publishing. Phillips, R.( 2005). Community indicators measuring systems Urban and regional planning and development. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. Torekull ,B. (2005). IKEA: the story of Ingvar Kamprad & IKEA, the world's leading home furnishing company. HarperCollins. Read More