Networking In Organisations and Its Relationship with Leadership - Case Study Example

ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOR. Name: University affiliation ORGANISATIONAL BEHAVIOR. Introduction. McCauley et al (1994), there are 5 varying foundations of challenges which bring about the retardation of job development. This challenges as highlighted by the above authors include: job changeovers, fashioning modifications, sky-scraping intensity of responsibility, non-authority interactions and finally, the obstacles. To handle such challenges is not an easy job. As a result, an intensive research was made to look for the way out. Several remedies have been pointed out in order to curb these challenges. In his book, Ibarra (1995a) argues that associations are vital. They are eventually capable of accomplishing the work, achieve and increase mobility, and help in individual build up and competence. She posits that the three types of networks are especially important to individuals in managerial positions. Each of these types is particularly relevant to leadership development processes. In this essay, we shall be much interested with the aims, the objectives, the strategic plans and the functionality of the newly introduced networking as a method of improving, empowering and enhancing smooth management of organizations. Throughout our discussion, we shall basically spot on the fundamental attributes and addressed in particulars that either challenge or promote networking. Ibarra & Hunter (2007), these concepts include: what is networking, types or forms of networking, the effect of networking on leadership sector, the obligatory role of social media in promoting networking and finally the limitations and negative impact of networking. In this essay, we shall be able to come up with issues negatively facing the leadership sector, discuss them and by the end of the session, we shall have come up with a useful network impressions to take in hand these challenges natural in headship development. Networking Concept. Henrik has defined networking as the objectionable activity of trading with foreign people, and luxury that he could accord all the possible significance. Networking can too be defined as a process of creating a foundation of individual relations, that would offer reinforcement, criticism, resources, and data information towards the organization. Consequently, networking is an aspect which should be admired by any person who is aspiring to be a leader (Inesi, 2010) thus is self-evident and the most trepidation developmental confront that this leaders have to address on. Network in this contextual phrase can be defined as a set of participants as well as the set of associates in lieu of some affiliation (Brass et al., 2004). Borgatti and Foster (2003) highlighted that the up-coming network archetype points out the merits of taking into consideration individuals as an entrenched mesh of interactions whose connotation is enthusiastically deciphered by the networking parties. Networking was set up to empower leaders, improve and develop the possessed leadership competence by both leveraging accessible network connections and running to put together new ones. We cannot also forget to consider significant and prospective diplomat of network and aptitude when spreading out the networking processes. Most leaders stress themselves in building extensive networks; however, the size of the network either large or small does not necessarily prove it to be a good network. The network can be large but still it could be offering the required information, possessions, and associations that which are primarily considered in an effective networking. Therefore, the importance of networking does not care the people you have within your peripheral but rather the quality and the formation of the network. The structure of a qualified network should conform to the standard criteria. A good network should be open. These aspect creates structural diversity thus empowering leaders with brand ideologies and capitalize on the most relevant and probable opportunities. The networking is supposed to be diversified with links across the bounders. Leaders should not be confined within a shallow perspective. Types of Networking. Brass et al (2004), there are 3 distinctive types of networking although they are highly related to each other: 1) Operational networking, is the form of networking that helps the managers to run institutions they lead. 2) Personal networking is a network that is capable of improving the personal attribute development to managers when they embrace them. and 3) Strategic networking is kind of networking that gives insights to managers thus make them devise new forms of organization interactions consequently increasing the number of stakeholders. Operational Networking. This form of networking is mainly termed as the heart of the organization, therefore, it is mandatory for every manager to create the opportunity and embrace firm relations during working perspective. The personnel equipped with such strong factors, assist them to perfectly perform their jobs well. Operational networking always gives room for collaboration and synchronization amid the members of the organization therefore enforcing trust, and consequently achieving the strategic plan stipulated. This operational form of network is limited to the specific aims and objectives which are set. The network does not go extra mile to ask strategic questions like what should be done. In other words, the managers do not utilize personal and strategic network choices since the responsibilities are defined by the work and organization structure. When using such network approach, the leaders need to re-orient their network externally and aim for future. Personal Networking is a form of network in which the individual managers or leaders improvise their professional alliances, alumni assemblages, clubs and individual interests to achieve modern and new perspectives that spearhead their advancements in the line of their career. Personal network offers eminent recommendations, information and nevertheless, developmental powers such as training and mentoring. This form of networking can too be a worth space for individual expansion thus providing basis for strategic networking. Personal networks are intensively external and created by flexible associations together with people without a common factor there before. Strategic Networking is simply the imaginative and perpendicular assortments with other purposeful and business entity managers and all the immediate people away from their territorial control merging together to enhance the future growth (Bartol & Zhang 2007). A manager who is working beside actors with vast affiliations, foundations, aims and incentives obliges the manager to initiate a business but not functional aims and work via the correlation and networks required to sell thoughts and the assets. Strategic network has the leverage that is capable of marshaling information, help to retrieve resources form any other network. The strategic network influences the relational atmosphere to the shape desired either by firing and hiring workers, altering suppliers and sources of financial, gesticulating position partners in peer place and re-structuring the managements body to offer networks worth their business objectives. Networking and leadership. Leadership is an influential faculty in an organization structure because it is the body that manages the progression, achievements, strategic plans and developmental architects of the firm. Essentially, leadership is an impacting process by which leaders work together with others which consequently impart on personal, the group, and organizational performance. Leaders are necessitated t join and embrace networking in accordance to Kotter (1982) and Luthans (1988). However, despite this urge, very minimal attention has been paid by the leaders to initiate networking programs but rather; they have potentially empowered networking as a trail of leadership development. Leadership growth is therefore defined as an extension of an individual's competence to slot in valuable leadership mandates and programs (McCauley et al 1998). The leadership responsibilities may include positions with official power or un-official obligations devoid of authority. Closely related leadership activities tackle the plans and procedures connected with heartening individuals to work successfully collectively. The organizational management should embrace the applicability of the networking strategy when the challenge facing the firm is beyond the roles of the managerial group. The challenge that engrosses the entire business can be solved by relational or networking rather than the analytical approach (Bartol & Zhang 2007). Mainly, the leaders fail to understand that sharing, exchanging and interacting with various current assortments as well as prospective stakeholders are essentially one of their recommended responsibilities. Eventually a leader who does not absorb the necessity of networking in the organization he/she leads, definitely, plans to fail in either leadership position or the firm or fail in both. The role of social media in network building. Social media has impacted on the individual and the corresponding outcomes which construes along gamut varying from structural determinism to personal outfit (Archer, 1995). This point o view claims that both the limitations and prospective offered by the social configuration give very small chance for personal choice when evaluating behavior. The view of bureau concerning the social behavior is contrasting ton that of individual. The agency pre-supposes that social participants act an active part in modeling their power in the social organization through engagement in social assortments and objectively forming a social web. The surfacing of the glossary of social set-up provides lens for magnifying the social characterization which lays more emphasis on the personal actions in the social structures. Social networking involves construction and encouragement of individual and specialized collaborations creating a structure of information, links, and hold up crucial contemplation for profession and individual achievement. Such vigorous networking is pertinent to firms, as internal networking and more so external networking thus increasing the members’ publicity and individual wisdom. Archer (1995), this kind of network promotes understanding of managerial performance, enhances skills advancement, and endows people with role clarity. The initiation of social media has promoted construction of individual’s social links in an organization. Social media too has confirmed the conception of networking as fundamental in both classes and proficient practice. Such improvements enhanced by social media have caused diversified potential impacts on personal behavior and the organizations repercussions. The organizations and individuals live within the peripheral of the media’s interaction web. Why does networking make people feel uncomfortable?  Nothing which has advantage that does not have disadvantages. A good criticism should be double edged. Despite the couple of importance networking has, it has several limitations: Many leaders shy off from being backbitten, and embarrassed conversations. In the process of networking, abusive languages and challenges might be posed to these leaders. The way of approaching and the content delivered during networking process affects personal morality. Zhong & Liljenquist, (2006) & Lee & Schwarz, (2010), as people like to remove the physical dirt, too the need to erase the networking- induced perception of dirt. Networking creates a sophisticated and hypothetical link flanked by sentiment dirty during influential networking. Conclusion Leaders endowed with a dense networking procedure eventually build their quality associations towards others (Ibarra & Hunter 2007). This aspect of collaboration enhance a deep, skillful, resourceful and rigid background to both the leadership body and the organization management, hence the success is achievable and realistic. When the leaders promote deep assortments definitely, such relationships provide a precious perspective and social reinforcement. A good standing relationship is measured to be four times better in terms of performance compared to any other network estimates. Ibarra & Hunter (2007), achieving prospective leadership qualities is a prerequisite for every person since everyone is a leader of him/herself. Good leaders commences with self advancement in leading their lives properly. The crucial requirement of transition leadership qualities is the conformation of the leaders according to operational network. Therefore, people aspiring to be leaders are limited by neither organizational nor functional demarcations. Herminia Ibarra in her book, says that a leader who does not embrace the concept of networking, he/she is planning to fail or remain stuck in one place without development. Ibarra too enhance that networking is mandatory foe any business leader in the current competitive world Reference List. Ibarra, H. and Hunter, M. (2007) How leaders create and use networks. Harvard Business Review, 85 (1), 40-47  Bartol, K.M. and Zhang, X. (2007) Networks and leadership development: building linkages for capacity acquisition and capital accrual. Human Resource Management Review, 17 (4), 388-401  Casciaro, T., Gino, F. and Kouchaki, M. (2014) The contaminating effects of building instrumental ties: how networking can make us feel dirty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59 (4), 705-735  McCauley, Ruderman, Ohlott, and Morrow (1994)) Developing Leaders via Experience: The Role of Developmental Challenge, Learning Orientation, and Feedback Availability. University of Michigan. Borgatti, S. P. and P. C. Foster: (2003), ‘The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology’, Journal of Management 29(6), 991–1013. Brass, D. J., K. D. Butterfield and B. C. Skaggs: (1998), ‘Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 23(1), 14–31. Brass, D. J., J. Galaskiewicz, H. R. Greve and W. Tsai: 2004, ‘Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective’, Academy of Management Journal 47(6), 795–817. Archer, M. 1995 Realist social theory: The morphogenic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Forret, M. L., and T. W. Dougherty 2001 "Correlates of networking behavior for managerial and professional employees." Group & Organization Management, 26: 283-311. Higgins, M. C., and K. E. Kram 2001 "Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective." Academy of Management Review, 26: 264-288. Inesi, M. E. 2010 "Power and loss aversion." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112: 58-69. Read More