Leadership and Strategy - Essay Example

Leadership and Strategy Name: Institutional Affiliation: Instructor: Date: Introduction Good leadership is very essential to all organizations in order for them to achieve the mission and missions and also guide them through rapid changes. Competition in the current world is very stiff and hence leadership strategies are required to manage the competition. However, current research shows that majority of the leaders fail to observe the changes and thus are unable to implement the required strategies. Meeting the indeterminate future for such leaders has over time proven to be hard. The approach to leadership should be changed for any organization to meet its target. Currently, each and every organization clearly observes the ability of the leaders in each department to achieve what is needed. Sources have it that the fate of CEOs is the quality of their leadership. The levels of achievements needed by organizations are determined by leadership strategies. This also determines the number of leaders needed by various organizations. The more the competitive the leader is, the more an organization reduces the number of leaders and the more the salary to the existing leaders. However, the level of skills and the fashion they have are what they determine what they archive either collectively or individually. For good strategies to be laid down, the leaders should receive recommendations to balance the gap between the existing and the future strategies. Furthermore, strategies are only accomplished when there is sustainability of the public interest in terms of quality and similarity. Companies are taking sustainability initiatives for many reasons. Majority of them are connecting initiatives so that they can use them to classify various strategies within the specific companies, however, others view it as a tool of minimizing the costs within the company thus eliminating competition as much as possible. Above the duty of building the brand and name of the organization as stated in the mission statement, others just want sustainability to be part of the value statement. Literature review It is incredible to cover the whole variety of current literature review in this area and still do justice to the main theme, but here is some few interesting reference. The most universal idioms previously discussed within the topic of leadership and strategy include; congruence, change, dyadic, emotional intelligence, relationship and traditional charismatic leadership (Edward, 2008). The importance for this terms used in research is to shade light to the reader imminent into their interdependence thus giving accurate portrayal of their essentiality in the leadership and strategies. According to Edward (2008), change is fundamentally about feelings. All changes made by leaders within any organization can lead to positive or negative results depending on the level sensitivity and the perception of the members on the change. When the leaders of an organization provide values which are in accordance with the association’s values, job satisfaction and commitment increase and in an event that the strategies does not satisfy the followers willingness, the staff turnover increases (Edward, 2008), hence, the value of the strategies must first be checked before initiating change. (Eweje & Perry, 2011), further supported the argument that values is organized in order depending with the essentiality to the personality and that such values can have a direct force on their performance thus having a need for the organizational change. Furthermore, as research done by various scholars on issues related to sustainability has risen from 1980s (Sawyer, 2004), general literature on studies of sustainability responsibility from different social responsibility strategy among organizational membership has increased. According to Sawyer (2004), sustainability leadership sculpt is a mutual level sculpt that gives a start for the development, as well as implementation of execution of the required efforts. Emotional aptitude has also been described in present-day literature. (Eweje & Perry, 2011), argued that emotional intelligence conceptualizes and incorporates additional factors which include persistence, zeal or assertiveness and hence includes personality and mental abilities. On the other hand, Great Britain (2005), research indicates that emotional intelligence is reached when individuals learn not only to imitate and learn but also to control the teams and emotions to aid in their thought process thus creating unconditional trust. Empirical research indicates that there is a direct link between transformational strategies in leadership and positive outcomes emerging from the followers (Sawyer, 2004). These behaviors and attitudes as well as motivations from both the individuals and groups shoot from their values and how strongly tied to the organizational success. However, theories suggest that well socialized charismatic leaders can make such influence (Brown et al, 2009). Risen research further backs the idea that transformational leaders are effective when there is clear goal and in particular when the team goal shares a direct relation with apparent leadership and the firm’s performance. Objectives There have been several shortcomings in leadership in terms of how the strategies are laid down. To tackle these important shortcomings, we show the way formerly developed complete model of employee appointment may be leveraged to develop wide-ranging sustainability strategy. This model is a type of model which gives a proper foundation for construction and development of well planed sustainability efforts. The other objective is to define the workforce engagement. The pillar of the sustainability leadership model is an occupied workforce. The main element of changing the firm’s consistency mission and the strategy is the workforce engagement into visible results. For instance, majority of the followers have over time identified good will to the sustainability of strategies as one of their core values (Eweje & Perry, 2011). Leadership of any organization can act as a motivation factor to the members to even do what is not expected of them and this has been confirmed over time to intensify productivity and also boost client fulfillment. Besides, the researchers argue that when workers are involved in development of strategies in a company, they can easily identify and undertake new opportunities to put the strategy into practice (Morrill, 2010). To relate the organizational mission and sustainability is the other objective. Scholars argue that the inclusion or exclusion of new sustainable strategies any firm goal statement is among the first priorities in any firms commitment to undergo well improved strategies over old ones, which usually develops in various stages (Martino, 2008). Risk management perspective is stage number one of commitment to sustainability; it is associated with constant sustainability activity as well as limited sustainability programs. However, in this stage the sustainability is not included in the mission of the farm but it is usually seen as a key tool to keep the firm’s reputation at the highest level possible. The last and the most significant stage is the citizenship stage (Timothy, 2012). This stage is associated with senior leadership commitment to develop and implement social issues for the firm. It is at this stage that transformations of new strategies are adopted into the business model to take lead in social issues. This is encouraged by the review of the company’s mission to merge the sustainability. The two key issues which are sustainability and strategy are hard to maintain within a company (Sawyer, 2004). Various organizations perceive a feeling of doing something good to improve their performance but most of them usually fail to link their efforts to sustainable strategies. The worldwide survey indicates that many corporate fail to achieve sustainability on their business strategies. For instance research done by Martino (2008), found that majority of the respondents in the research conducted have a strong believe that sustainability has become important over time to all business strategies and those who don’t keep sustainability are failing. If firm’s sustainability labors are to improve the value to the company and the society, then sustainability should be given priority and be integrated into strategy. In reaction to this argument, Eweje & Perry (2011) argued that each and every firm notices unique issues in the social setting that may solve challenges in the organization and thus benefit the organization. The chief tool for constructing good relationship among the members of an organization is the full range leadership model. However, this model is very sensitive during development process for sustainability practices within company (Timothy, 2012). Understanding the behavior of every leader within the organization is very important so as to apply the essentiality of this model. The full range view is of the idea that high level of performance is reached when leaders are involved in transactional leadership process that provides framework for continuo’s development within an organization (Martino, 2008). On the other hand, transactional leadership behavior emphases that performance and expectations rely on laid strategies. Leaders who fail to develop strategies leave the followers confused and may make the company to fail not meeting the target goals (Timothy, 2012). However, when the new strategies go hand in hand with the needs and expectations of both the leaders and the members, the relationship will boost performance (Martino, 2008). Trust and commitment is developed by the leader when he or she has target and plan to attain a goal within a specific period of time. Research indicates that good leadership alone is not enough to attract the attention of the followers, trust is also very essential for engagement to take place between them (Weigel, 2010). For the followers to engage fully, their leaders should enhance their transactional behaviors with their strategies to build trust developed through transformational leadership behaviors which include idealized vision and inspirational motivation. Comparing A with B The Emerald article has put emphasize on qualities of good leadership and the results of good strategies made by leaders on the organizations. It is concerned with the people’s consciousness on sustainability in business. On the other hand, the article on American politics research put emphasize on pure politics (Martino, 2008). However, both of them focus on the importance of good leadership and how well laid strategies can help the followers in any organization to gain more confidence and become committed (Timothy, 2012). Emerald article is more concerned with importance of strategies on general performance of any organization while APR is concerned with the party and power, the followers partaking and leadership strategy in the single Lame-Duck congressional period (Edward, 2008). American political research article (APR) has mentioned some specific leaders like senators and their roles whereas emerald article has just give discussions on general performance of leaders and the way strategies are used to meet the goals of the company. The American political research article (APR) has given out a specific example of strategy to shade more light on essentiality of making strategies in any form of leadership. It has used the lame-duck waters care company to show how the followers can benefit from strategies laid down by leaders. On the other hand, emerald article has not used any specific example but has elaborated on importance of strategies in all forms of organizations. However, both articles have focused on strategy and sustainability in leadership and its importance to the followers. The American political research article (APR) investigates how leaders develop the party agendas and also assess how people are influenced to behave in a particular manner and hence participation of members across sessions (Weigel, 2010). On the other hand, emerald article argues that when followers’ separations are carried in a way that signifies the respect and the integrity of the company, followers develop a feeling of fairness (Morrill, 2010). This is a clear indication that emerald article is more general than the American political research article (APR) article which focus on the American politics only. However, both articles have some interest on the importance of strategies and sustainable leadership. How A relate with B Both articles have stated that on their findings, the trust employees and voters place in an organizations leadership is vital for organizations to meet their sustainability targets. When the followers trust a leader and what he/she offers to the organization, they are willing to be exposed to the leaders’ action. Both articles states that trust in a leader has essential outcomes for the level of member’s commitment. American political research article (APR) is related to emerald article in that it focuses on leadership. It argues that leaders are known to depend on the results of how the followers vote to surpass their strategies hopping for irregular support from leave-taking members who might only vote under specific circumstances (Morrill, 2010). This is related with the emerald article in that it also focuses on trust developed between leaders and the followers in any important strategies. Both articles are of the opinion that leaders are to give direction to the followers by laying down proper and well defined strategies. For instance, in American political research article (APR) states that the leader’s main task is to decide what are reaching the grass root level to be discussed by the (Edwards, 2005). Both articles are related in that they observe the impacts of behavior change on followers when the leaders adopt various strategies in the company. They both argue that motivation from leaders makes the followers to feel appreciated and hence act appropriately and hence perform well (Edward, 2008). Participation of members in both political and economic activities depends with the way the leader behaves (Great Britain, 2005). When the followers develop trust on the leader, they are more likely to follow the strategies they lay down. However, ones the trust and negative perception is developed, the employees in the companies as well as voters in the political arena develop negative pressure and become harder to be controlled. Both articles also emphasize on importance of culture in development and propagation of new strategies within an organization or political party. Humans are physically resistant to change and they should be thought on the importance that will come with the new changes. Although research indicates that there are some major components, political and other organizations have not been able to develop strategies with inclusive efforts. Hence, the sustainability leadership model provides a lee way that can be used to develop management’s and good strategies for both small and big organizations. In conclusion strategy sustainability within an organization is very important. It helps the employees as well as political followers to develop trust to their leaders which in turn results in high production and high vote turn out. Working with an aim of getting reward boosts performance in an organization. References Edward, A. (2008). The Revolution of Sustainability: Portrait of Paradigm Shift. Norwich: The stationery Office Limited. Eweje, G., & Perry, M. (2011). Business and Sustainability: Concepts, Strategies and Changes. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. Great Britain. (2005). Sustainable Communities: People, Places and Prosperity. Norwich: The Stationery Office Limited. Martino, L. (2008). Leadership & Strategy Lessons From Alexander The Great: Traits, Behaviors and Strategies of The Only Person Who Conquered And Ruled The Known World. Charleston, S.C.: BookSurge Pub. Morrill, R. (2010). Strategic Leadership. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Pub. Group. Sawyer, R. (2004). The Essence of War: [Zhan lüe zong Yao]:Leadership and Strategy From The Chinese Military Classics. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press. Timothy J. (2012). Sustainability and Leadership: From the Strategy to Results, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol.33 Iss: 46-52. Weigel, D. (2010). Lame-Duck Quackery. Slate, August 5 From, Journal of Political Strategy and Leadership, vol. 27 Iss: 38-42. American Politics Research: http://apr.sagepub.com/: retrieved on 23rd February, 2014. Read More