Surplus Success for Sydney Theatre Company - Case Study Example

The Sydney Theatre Company Name Institution Date The Sydney Theatre Company Summary of the Discussion Sydney Theatre Company provides a form of evening entertainment to the people in Sydney. It has been a major force of drama in Australia since December 1978. It was an old site of the Sydney Harbour. The theater was able to bring up a program called the Greening the Wharf which was majored in the environment and nature Lesnie (2011) states. The program was able to operate beyond the infrastructure of the business and engaged with the community and its workers at large. This context will be highlighting and discussing on the Sydney Theater Company and how it displayed the open system thinking in its operations. Sydney Theatre Company offers both diverse national and international arrangement of classics collections of ridiculous writings and plays through entertainment. In reference to Zuber-Skerritt (1998), the company takes great delight in innovative leads in art and in progress of experiments. It has a lead idea for creativity in business. It created a good management structure that facilitated them to increase in the year 2011. The theater dwelled in making teamwork managements such as the team collaboration of Cate Blanchett and Andrew Upton. The company had the three streams of art, community and business working in relation. STC engaged into cross promotions that were highly preferable in making positive gains. The attention of the theater became substantial to the culturally and environmental sector. According to Banham (1995), Sydney Theater Company looked into becoming a global business in its operations. The company went to an increased profit following the lead management from Cate and Upton, the company enlarged and gained an increase in the number of customers. However, Upton and Cate still majored their views in the effort of team work in reference t o their employees. The management strongly believes that the company can only be beneficial if it is run by a team and not individual manager. In reference to Clegg, Hardy and  Nord (1999), the team management is focused at creating long term goals especially in making relationships to benefit the company. It majored its programs into finding partners and sponsors such as CBA for short and long term developments in the business sector. According to Zuber-Skerritt (1998), the Sydney opera house intended to create a theater change that could be of effect and of total impact to any event to be held. The theater intended to bring out an outstanding, unique and creative state of art. Kelly (1998) points out that the theater is an arena used to show case the biggest celebrities in Sydney comedian, musician among others like actors. The theater is also a high level of social gathering that looked into to the future of theater as a very productive business sector to venture into. Moreover, the sponsors and partners are happy that the community is highly benefiting from the upcoming of the company at large. The company in addition is planning to go ahead in advancing through the media and creating a theater without any limitation to the bright future of art work locally and internationally. The display of open systems thinking at Sydney Theatre Company An open system is the flexibility of the mind that is given in audience and the performers in theater structure and also outside in the work field. It is the art and science of developing deep considerate structures to shapeup behaviors and systems. In reference to Clegg, Hardy &  Nord (1999) the theatre company uses integrations and coordination between departments to create and open system that is functional. This is done through the incorporation of sophisticated lighting and sound system which enhanced coordination in the theater. This extremely captures the attention of audience. It is a system that focuses on the engagement of things in a cylindrical movement rather than a linear mode or relations. It captures more of flows and movements. Open system thinking is displayed in Sydney Theater Company in complexity and improbability. This is seen in the indifference that is displayed on things at the theater to capture attention. The theater engaged in the search of patterns with complexity to explore the dynamics of event and to interconnect them to create a chain of events. This advancement is made to present a certain level of competence. The open system is displayed in the interrelation character that they had with their partners to bring long time supporters to the business in the theater. Open thinking system is established through the art of creating imaginative characters and theatrical art form. It gives an open system of thinking by engaging in educational programs and other artistic work from developing artist in the field of art. It encouraged a high level of self organization in the system by making or giving a chance to wise leadership. This gives an open thinking system in the creation of individual critical self reflection. According to Zuber-Skerritt (1998), it creates a unique complex reaction that results into a competitive field of workers with ideas that are not of communal knowledge. They ensure the workers are set and enthusiastic to join in the working system to form a global working environment. The open system is displayed in the urge of the theater to incorporate different cultural values from different artist in order to give a variety of presentations. In reference Banham (1995), the managements puts it out that there has to be the use of core skills that will make one a remarkable thinker in the relative field. This can give a very positive effect in the productivity level of the company in a short duration. The open system is also displayed in the position description of the employees where they are well aware of what they are expected to do and deliver in the company from time to time. Other than the mentioned ways, the company displays the open system of the thinking in the management of human diversity in its great sense of mobility and development. The different resources in one field are attended to from different angles of approaches to give diverse values. This system of thinking is clearly seen in the work flow of the company’s creativity to bring up end results that are not common in the market. According to Banham (1995), the system of cycles of event can be interchanged in and about to bring up a final product that will be new to the audience although the concepts may be similar from the past. The open thinking can reflect in the effects of event that can be either positive or negative in the art work. Once an event has been modified and changed then the effects are highly visible in character. The output of events from different sources gives the equifined character of the open system. This is highly manifested when the same idea is put into different channels of transmission but with the main agenda of getting a refined similar product as a result. In this manner a pure exultation of ideas is done from all corners of the relevant field. The dynamics of event also display the open thinking system in the art field in the theater. There are different modes of thing s or events which keep on changing due to certain factor in life or environments according to Kelly (1998). This gives the system the openness in operation to an extend that will suit the relevant course of business at that particular point. This comes along due to the fact that you can never predict over some issue in business no matter the kind of technology that is involved. In some instance where there is a live open air event then the system definitely is put into action in case of any outstanding difficulty that may arise in the cause of events. The theater is indeed a very sensitive business sector which requires a lot of importation and codification practices. In reference to Clegg, Hardy and  Nord (1999), the intercommunication system is a display of the open thinking to which the extend of communication in the theater has to be elaborate enough for every customer to grasp the content of what is being communicated along. The output of the art product should not be too complex in a way that it cannot be easily interpreted. According to Bennett (2005), the display seen in the performance on stage to the audience is also an allowance for the audience to participate with specific gestures in certain arena at the theater. In relation to Zuber-Skerritt (1998), where open thinking is visualized it is sometime displayed through in some characters that are very unique and interesting in the plays and writing. This system is highly used in theater where writing and poetry is done by eloquent actors and actresses. Conclusion In conclusion, the four team member management group is to be given much respect for the strategies and the hard work they put in making sure that the theater raises to the top in so many ways in Sydney. The theater has brought up new upcoming wrights like Bobby and Ellis among others in the field of art which has become very popular through literature work. Moreover, this field of art and business in coordination with the community is still developing at a high speed, creating more jobs apart from entertainment throughout the world. Reference Banham M. (1995). The Cambridge Guide to Theatre. New York. Cambridge University Press, Lesnie M. (2011). Surplus success for Sydney Theatre Company. Retrieved on November 21 from < http://www.limelightmagazine.com.au/Article/258676,surplus-success-for- sydney-theatre-company.aspx> Bennett B. (2005). All Theater is RevolutionaryTheater. New York: Cornell University Press. Clegg S. R., Hardy C. &  Nord W. R. (1999). Managing Organizations: Current Issues. United Kingdom. SAGE. Kelly V. (1998) Our Australian Theatre in the 1990s. Amsterdam: Rodopi Publishers. Zuber-Skerritt O.(1998). David Williamson. Amsterdam: Rodopi Publishers. Read More