Employee Performance Appraisal - Example

Name: xxxxxxxxx Tutor: xxxxxxxxx Title: Employee Performance Appraisal Institution: xxxxxxxxx Date due: xxxxxxxxx Introduction Supervision of worker performance remains a very significant facet in the work place that all executives and assessment officials perform within a specified period. Performance appraisal is as relevant as administration of financial assets and impacts of programs, since employee effectiveness at works, has an insightful effect on an organizations’ fiscal and program entities (Grote, 2002). The ultimate goal in any organizational presentation appraisal program form is to develop future work performance objectives and expectations. More often this is a process of thoroughly evaluating performance and present feedback on which employee training, issues of promotion or demotion are based and ultimately doing necessary adjustments. According to employee’s perspective, performance appraisal form has to be divided in fundamental sections. The appraisal programs have to clearly identify what is expected from the employees. Then it should be developed in a manner that it meets needs of the organization in improving the employee’s performance (Reed, 2006). The appraisal program has to meet employees reward needs this is achieved through rewarding improved performance. Thus the ultimate essence of performance appraisal has to assume the role of employee motivation as this is the only effective way of developing an increased performance across the employee functions. The form presented a gain falls short of meeting all these employee needs, this indicates the appraisal form will fail to obtain part of crucial information, necessary in developing increased performance strategies as this is one tool used by management in establishing effective strategies of boosting employee performance (Grote, 2002). Developing Employee Performance Appraisal Plans (EPAP) Reviewing the appraisal form used, it is evident that it falls short of some objective issues; the form fails to address issues of advance planning and organization requirements in meeting the desired results. In addition no proper strategies on handling issues of employee performance expectation and rating, this include situating effective prospects and objectives designed for individual employees for the purpose of driving efforts toward attaining the set objectives. This made through involving the staff in the development process necessary, as it develops a better consideration of the organization and work on what is expected (Shariq, 1998). Organizational EPAP’s has to clearly outline exact vital basics and values that the member of staff is expected to achieve throughout the evaluation cycle. This performance necessities that are vital basics and values should be evenhanded, assessable, comprehensible, provable and at most attainable (Khandekar, 2005). Developing a an effective performance appraisal, flexible program objectives and work requirements planning depicts a bright future when fundamental operational credentials are often if not frequently conferred and not simply official procedures are filed and only perused only whilst rating of the performance documentation are highly recommended by the organization (Goetsch, 2011). The organization’s policies should outline elements in their appraisal plans, these elements have to be considered crucial as through these elements employees are held accountable on an individual basis for any work responsibilities in their rank in the work place. The grave ingredient is the responsibility of such impotence, where substandard effectiveness in the constituent unaided results in determining employee’s overall performance is below required standards. In addition, failure of part of the critical elements may impacts to employee’s reassignment or adequate solution (Levoy, 2007). Appraisal Program Assessment The notion of assessing the significance and the efficacy of an appraisal strategic project is essential for incumbently shaping the best way to improve it employee productivity. If the form issued fails to provide, Organizations are required to evaluate their performance appraisal systems. The assessment process is a combined procedure which involves both the executives and the employee, who spot familiar objectives in correlation to higher goal of the organization (Bohlander, 2009). According to Martocchio (2005) the organizational policies for departmental internal performance supervision, more often is structured to certify prospect of individuals and organizational effectiveness. The appraisal form serves to provide a significant procedure by through which the work force is rewarded for no worthy support to the firm, while identifying the necessary elements that have to be accamplished. The rationale of gauging effectiveness is not only used to point out where there is a fault in the workflow according to plan but also recognize why processes are running smooth, hence necessary steps can be employed for fortification of success (Sudhakar, 2011). When we review the identified form there are some aspects that need improvement to effectively serve its purpose. Strategies Performance appraisal programs are governed by two elements which they critically address. Are the employees doing things in the right manner? In this the process has to establish whether the rules and regulations in the organization are being followed rightfully considering work ethics. Are employees doing the right tasks? Here the appraisal has to determine the impact it has to the general workforce in-terms of productivity (Pieter & Grobler, 2005). Issues of Appraisal Compliance The form does not specify the exact time or period the employee appraisal is being assessed on. Evidently this form will deliver low quality information necessary for workforce planning. This form usually is seen to be a HR tool of evaluation. Hence, there critical issues that would have been incorporated to fully meet the desired quality as an analysis system within the HR, for instance, the form as an evolution tool, which determines if the organization falls in line with system regulation and program requirements (Daley, 1992). Examples of questions that the program raises may be: where appraisals program are done on a specified time or period? Did everyone who was to be an appraised, appraised? Was employees’ performance documentation plans issued on timely basis? Was program reviews conducted? Moreover, did management dedicate appropriate resources and bestowed time priorities to the effectual maintenance and process of the appraisal? In the appraisal program and its relevancy in any given organization, compliance information is crucial. If the program is not done as it was structured to do, it will have little chance of achieving the needs expected returns. Therefore compliance data should not be the only program issued for evaluated (Sudhakar, 2011). Appraisal Effect The evaluator’s second question on the form has to address whether “employees are doing the right things?” attempts to determine the aftermath of the whole process. To determine the possible solution in the results of an appraisal program, there are clear questions in determining this. For instance, the evaluator may come up with questions: are the stated objectives of the appraisal met? In incidences where goals are not, users have unrecorded prospects and in that case are they are met? This helps the evaluator to focus on appraisal goals and objectives, assessors are able to gather reliable data specifically goals of organizational employee appraisal and reporting the results in terms of achievement. The appraisal goals could include, improving communication concerning expectations among supervisors and employees (Levoy, 2007). Are managers, employees satisfied with the equity, utility and accuracy among other elements in the program? This reveals the perceptions of the employees and managers. This is important to the organizational triumph and its effectiveness concerning this program, asserts Gitman, (2008). The workforce of an organization need an adequate feedback on their efficacy while their elements and standards remain up to date and fair. This is crucial in boosting employees’ morale and ultimately fulfills the essence of appraisal program through increased performance among the workforce. On the contrary, the perception of clients would be critical in determining whether the program operation is effective or converse. Information Background Performance appraisal is a technique which the productivity of an employee is assessed. Therefore the job quality of an employee is analyzed through cost effectiveness, time consumption and the output quantity. Thus the worth of an employee is then obtained basing on his achievements and failures. It hence has various objectives: relays employee’s performance, gives room for organizational progression, validates the criteria in which employees can be recruited, structures a framework for personal decision and responds to organizational needs. There are various approaches that are used for evaluating the performance of an employee that is numerical or scalar rating (Tayles, 2007). The most common techniques are: 360-degree appraisal, behavioral surveillance degree, behavioral affixation rating degree and management by purpose. For organizational success performance appraisal is mandatory for proper evaluation of staff. Formally appraisal presentations are usually carried out annually for the whole organization and individually through their line manager. This technique was used during the 20th century as a tool for assessing the organizational performance specifically the employees (Murphy, 2004). Significance Why performance appraisal The need for performance appraisal is rapidly growing especially in firms targeting the staff and the managers. Most firms are liable to make decisions basing on the extent which accountability is a reciprocal of occupational responsibility, this will in this event feature on the performance appraisals. The structure of an appraisal must be formal however this does not necessarily mean that the progress argued with appraise be formal and forced. This means that appraisals address a person holistically in his development, not only leaning on the job skills for the expected proceeding promotion. Discrimination against age, gender, race, ability and religion is eradicated (Patterson, 1987). Designing and conducting When designing an appraisal and finally conducting it, the firm seeks to help the individual to establish his skills not only identifying work skills training. Through this the employee will mature in attitude, motivational and develop newer skills which are relevant to the firm’s productivity. It is therefore vital to develop the whole person responding to corporate responsibility making him more advantageous to the employment market (Archer North & Associatiates, 1998). Reasons for appraisal Though appraisals are rather ancient they are still yet to be dismissed. Critics of appraisals are thus people who cannot conduct them cohesively within the firm. There are various reasons for the employment of appraisals within the organization. Such include: measure of performance, defining goals and priorities, motivational notions through achievements and failures, identity the strengths and weakness of the firm, occupational planning and evaluation, enhance team building and identification of individual roles, enhance proper feedback mechanism and growth of employees and responsibilities. During this enlightenment age employees have less time being face to face. Appraisals offer a motive to protect and manage face to face chances. Therefore, with other alternatives emerging performance appraisal vests all the facets performance and attitude fostering this outweigh all new designs (Carroll & Craig, 1982). Mode of analysis Firms are needed to analyze the effectiveness of an appraisal programs for sensitization on ways to improve it. The firm therefore should ideally evaluate the framework for the necessary implementation of the program. The techniques employed and queries should be alike the ones used in the designing procedure. For instance an appraisal of a survey of satisfactory level of employees and managers, the same design could be used to make comparisons of the transitions of the satisfaction levels of employees between the old and the new. During the development of the appraisal the designer should develop a criterion for the determination of the success of the design. The current program should be part and parcel of the design and should be forecasted for organizational effectiveness (Mohrman, 1989). Procedure of a performance appraisal Preparation phase: Notes, current job description and records affiliated with the report are prepared that is anything pertaining achievements and failures. Write down the order of appraisal work to be carried out. The preparation should put into consideration “whole person development” that is beyond and outside the occupation. In the corporate world most employees are not hungry for job skills training but oriented towards being motivated through other learning and progressive experiences. Hence the line manager should get to know what the employees are good in outside their working environment, talents. Talents usually contribute highly on someone’s character and maturity in their respective workplaces. Through finding chances to stimulate employee performance appraisal will a taken positively in the firm. This will focus on helping the individual grow in skills (Patton, 1978). Setup Phase The employees should be informed for effective timing and location. This involves the introduction of the purpose of the appraisal. Employees would then have the time to assemble the necessary information (performance records). The agenda of the appraisal will then be provided to enhance the comprehension of the program. A venue is then selected apt for the appraisees from interruptions similar to the mode used during recruitment. The line manager should avoid localities such as hotel lobbies, canteens and public lounges, ensure ideal privacy. The room chosen should ideally imply the purpose of the program. Irrespective of the content the environment should be relaxed to create an equitable position between the responded and the manager (Patton, 1978). Introduction Phase The appraisee should be relaxed, achieved through positive statement enabling a non-threatening atmosphere. Afterwards explain to the individual the goal of the task and encourage a friendly discussion. Review and measure the activities sequentially keeping conspicuous items one by one to avoid vague views. Solid evidence should in this case be separated from anecdotes. Factual statements such non-personal judgment are therefore the less bias. The interviewer will hence provide a score card which will be used as a measure of the performance, using aptitude tests. After this analysis the firm agrees on the plan of action, follow-up and agrees on the specific goals of the task to be carried out (Patton, 1978). Appraisal vs. management The executive highly depend on comparative performance data for making analysis for effective decision making. This therefore affects the whole firm in general; hence it is difficult to make personal decisions without making comparisons. For instance comparative decisions include: employee promotion, merit pay, downsizing and training programs. Through comparative decisions the management is able to make decisions with negative impacts such as downsizing whereby some employees are relinquished while others retained. The firm is then able to defend itself by relaying of the qualities of the employee over the other, enhancing organizational advancement. For a more reliable appraisal the management carries out reliable surveys (Imran, 2008). More often management would use Performance appraisal in evaluation of emplyee perfomance while effectively developing improved standards. It in this event, perfomance appraisal system assesses each individual productivity in opposition to concuring goals, standardisation and delagate accountability and chores (Youndt, 2004). It is important for staff inspiration, attitude and character up bring, enhancement os communication and bring into line individual as well as firm goals and missions. A positive working atmosphere is in this way created charaterised by improved competence among the employee. Appraisals provide a formal structure of recorded, frequent analysis of the employee giving room for planning. In this case chances for organisational growth escalates simulteneoulsy with profits. Appraisal vs. employee Employees reuire to at least have information concerning their performance at work. This is an essential feedback about how the employee is viewed in the company. Detailed information on marginal and and substandards perfomance is relayed. Moreover these data is used to trigger dialogue between the management and the employee. Planning is hence diagnosed for the development of the firm (Imran, 2008). Performance Appraisal Form Worker documentation 385200 Surname:…………………………….. Second name:………………………….. Profession/ Rank:………………………………… Team Leader: Surname:…………………………….. Second name:………………………….. Responsibility:…………………………….. Engagement Date:……………………… Previous Appraisal Date:……………………. Assessed by:……………………………………………………………………………… Description of Ratings Out standings (5): A performance that is beyond the appropriate performance values, Evolution process bases on providing leadership, fostering leadership, highly productive, innovative and responsive while generating team work. Exceeds Expectations (4): The employee performance consistently meets job requirements, often exceeds all relevant performance standards, this is indicated through initiative and versatility of the employee, works in a collaborative manner, has rigid foundational methods and interpersonal abilities or indicates a steady progression in these fields. Met opportunities (3): The employees who fall under this rate have to meet all relevant performance standards. However, the employees seldom exceed the desired performance levels. They lack suitable performance levels, the employee is thus still learning the responsibilities that he is entitled to. Below Standards (2): The employee at times meets the performance criterion expected which hardly ever exceeds the stated required standards, often fall short of the desired results. Employee performance report indicates declined results or more often the employee has no improvement as per the demand. This is since the last performance review or improvement plan. Need Enhancement (1) The employee falls short of performance standards expected Section A Appraisee to complete the form expectations before the interview and return to the appraiser by (date)……………. A1.1. The employee to state his comprehension of their main duties and responsibilities. A1.2 Discussion points: a) Has the past been: good, bad, or acceptable or below expectation for you? Explain why? b) What do you consider to be your most achievable period? c) What do workers like or dislike on matters concerning the organization? d) Which elements of the job do employee(s) find difficult? e) Which elements of employee responsibilities are of more interest to the employee or otherwise ascending? f) What does the employee consider the most vital objectives after the program? g) Which actions have to be undertaken to develop employee’s performance in the correct ranking by the employee with his or her boss? h) Which kind of duties the employee is willing to be doing in one/ two or even five or more year’s time? i) Which sort of training experiences would be essential in the preceding years, not just dwelling on the employee job-skill? Moreover, do your natural strengths and personal passions from employee benefit from these. Part B This section should be completed during the performance appraisal by the evaluator. Where it is necessary and safe to do so, some of the items can completed by the evaluator sooner than the evaluation thereafter then identify and validate or amended in conversation with the appraisee during the evaluation program. B.1.1.- Explain the functions of appraisee’s job. In this section argue and evaluate appraisal for oneself entrance in A1. Clarify the purpose of the job and precedence needed. B.1.2.- Examine the finished debate discussion in A2, noting the points of and action. Conclusion Appraisal is a vital tool in a firm for evaluation and effective management. It in this event assesses each individual performance in opposition to concuring goals, standardisation and delagate accountability and chores. It is important for staff inspiration, attitude and character up bring, enhancement of communication and bring into line individual as well as firm goals and missions. A positive working atmosphere is in this way created charaterised by improved competence among the employee. Appraisals provide a formal structure of recorded, frequent analysis of the employee giving room for planning. In this case chances for organisational growth escalates simulteneoulsy with profits. Bibliography Bob Levoy, R. P 2007, 222 secrets of hiring, managing, and retaining great employees in healthcare practices. Jones & Bartlett Learning, New york. Daley, D. M 1992, Performance appraisal in the public sector: techniques and application, ABC-CLIO, London. George Bohlander, S. S 2009, Managing Human Resources. Cengage Learning, London. Goetsch, D. L 2011, Developmental Leadership: Equipping, Enabling, and Empowering Employees for Peak Performance, Trafford Publishing, London. Grote, R. C 2002, The performance appraisal question and answer book: a survival guide for Managers, AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn, New York. Imran, A 2008, How and Why it is an Important and Effective for Any Orgaization. Purpose of Performance Appraisal. Lawrence J. Gitman, C. M 2008, The Future of Business: The Essentials, Cengage Learning, London. Sudhakar, G 2011, AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn, PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd, London. Archer North & Associatiates, 1998, Introduction to Performance Appraisal. Retrieved 09 11, 2011, from Performance Appraisal: Carroll, S 1982, Performance Appraisal and Review Systems, Glenview, Foresman and Company, IL Scott. Mohrman, A. M.-W 1989, Designing Performance Appraisal Systems, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco. Murphy, T. H 2004, Performance Appraisals, McGraw Hill, Sydney. Patterson, T. F1987, Performance Appraisa. Retrieved 09 09, 2011, from Refining Performance Appraisal: http://www.bnabooks.com/ababna/eeo/2004/eeo55.pdf Patton, M. Q 1978, Utilization-Focused Evaluation, SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills. Khandekar, A, 2005, Managing human resource capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. An empirical analysis from Indian global organisations Education and Training, Vol.47, pg. 628-639. Martocchio, J. J 2005, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Emerald Group Publishing, New York. Pieter A. Grobler, S. W 2005, Human Resource Management in South Africa, Cengage Learning EMEA, London. Reed, K. L 2006, Proposing and Testing an Intellectual Capital-Based View of the Firm. Journal of Management Studies , Vol.43, P. 867-893. Shariq, S. Z 1998, Sense making and artifacts:An exploration into the role of tools in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management , Vol. 2. Tayles, M. P 2007, Intellectual capital, management accounting practices and corporate performance; perceptions of managers. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal , Vol. 20 pg. 522. Youndt, M. A 2004, Human resource configurations, intellectual capital and organisational performance. Journal of management issues , Vol. 16 pg. 337-361. Read More