Strengths and Weaknesses of the Research on Managerial Work - Essay Example

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF THE RESEARCH ON MANAGERIAL WORK ANDHOW RESEARCH ON TEAMWORK SHAPES THE FUTURE OF RESEARCH ON MANAGERIAL WORK by Name Code + Course Name Professor’s Name University Name City, State Date Introduction Research is described as methodically and scientifically probing into the unidentified so as to get information on fixing issues. The major point here in a nutshell is the idea of trouble shooting and solving the problems. Both pure and applied research tries to perform problem-solving. Researchers attempt seek answers to problems in applied research and find solutions to particular questions. In other words, the focus in the field of applied research is getting the answers to fix issues. (Fells2000) points out those excellent managers are vital to business success and achievements. Every company can profit out of real managers, reason being, like higher technical workers, they offer qualities and features to the company that can aid it to get and maintain modest and aggressive advantage. In point of fact, there exists a history of function related to research that backs the idea that impressive and effective managers are quite significant in the achievements of the company. Technical employees whose performance is rated high were regularly chosen for managerial posts due to their capacity to perform technical assignments. However, good technical workers are not certainly good managers. Managerial assignments are characteristically dissimilar, mostly in the place of building relationships, so strong technical efficiency is not automatically the finest signal of proper managerial performance (Tengblad 2006). Strengths and Weaknesses of the Research on Managerial Work A lot of research concerning managerial work styles was performed before management possessed the technological innovation which is presently found in most countries. Only a small number of researchers have analyzed managing positions and actions since early studies performed over twenty years ago. According to (Mathieu, Travis, Rapp and Gilson 2008), the partial results from recent research analysis indicates that a lot continues to remain the same, but, on the other hand, it is also apparent that some factors have transformed, hence more study is required on managerial tasks which could be interfered with by globalization, from new technological innovations, by new types of companies arising, for example, virtual teams, combine adventures, team-based companies and many others. Other techniques to the research on managerial work have come up, including those concerned with decision-making at the managerial level and policy-making procedures and another one with managers social actions and interpersonal deeds. Some kind of scientific and empirical researchers that use "diary" technique, have analyzed that which is known as managerial "media" that is, through what ways, with whom, for how, where and in what do managers invest their time and skills (Gronn 1983). A lot of observational analysis and research concerning the characteristics of managerial work was developed to explain the common design and content of managerial actions, but does not out rightly answer the query on what action styles or habits are necessary and efficient. For example, finding out that numerous managers perform a certain task does not clearly show whether it is critical for managerial efficiency (Watson 2001). Even the outcomes of situational analysis could be deceiving. The most frequent actions design in a certain type of managerial work or scenario is not essentially the most beneficial one. Furthermore, work description studies evaluate their cognized significance of various actions and obligations for the job. This type of research shows resemblances and variations in expertise specifications across numerous managerial roles and posts (Mintzberg1990). However, observational information has the strong points in that it enables a researcher to observe straightly what individuals undertake without the necessity to depend on what they report to be doing. It also offers firsthand experience, mostly, if the viewer takes part in actions and can offer reasonably objective measurement of actions, particularly for consistent and standardized observations and findings. The viewer can figure out what does not happen and can also note factors that evade the attention of individuals in the establishment. It is a great way to realize what is happening in a certain setting, therefore, helping managers in comprehending the significance of contextual aspects. The information collected can utilized by members with poorly spoken abilities and also may offer data concerning things individuals would otherwise be reluctant to discuss. Persons observing may shift beyond particular views of individuals into the establishment that is better for description and offer saver age level of reality, when performed outside of the settings (Waters 1980). On the other hand, observational information displays faults which amongst many others, is that noticed actions may be uncertain and sensitive results may happen when participants become aware that are being witnessed, for instance, individuals being observed can act in certain ways. There happens to exist also detective results including personal tendencies and selective views and understanding of experts observing. Observer cans “go native”, which means, over-identifying together with the team being analyzed and testing of observed individuals and configurations may be restricted. This research method carries with it a limitation, in that it cannot exclusively notice large or scattered populace. In this case, some configurations and material of interest cannot be noticed and observed. Also, selection of insignificant material can be reasonably extra ordinary and happens to be more costly to undertake than surveys and assessments hence information research can be time intensive. The principal aim of research is to accomplish development of settlement systems, selection techniques, and performance evaluation methods, not to define how managerial actions are associated with managerial efficiency. The significance of scores achieved by various managers may be one-sided through stereotypes, generalizations or implicit concepts about efficient management. There is minimal proof though to show that managerial work and behaviors ranked most vital are also those that are linked most highly to requirements of managing efficiently. Illustrative research examines information from interviews with management teams assumed to be efficient, or managers from companies labeled as efficient. These research scientists tried to discover common styles that may describe the reason managers were working effectively. Nevertheless, the research did not equate in effective managers to effective ones. More dependable ideas would be obtained if researchers paralleled habits for efficient managers and ineffective ones of the same kind and clearly scrutinized the relation of managerial habits to the demands of the management work situation (Kotter1982). Having said that, nevertheless, interviews as a technique of research on managerial work carries with it some strengths such as being conducive for determining behavior and a lot more other parameters of interest and offers searching and presenting of follow-up queries by the interviewing member. This procedure can offer in-depth details, data about participants’ inner definitions and manner of thinking. Closed-ended interviews offer precise data required by researcher. E-mail and telephone interviews offer fast turn-around. Reasonably great statistic credibility, that is, has abundant stability and reliability for well-constructed and examined methods. Interviews as a style can utilize probability models, it somewhat has great reaction rates and convenient for investigation as well as verification. Conversely, there are weaknesses of interviews research technique whose outcomes may negatively affect managerial work. These weaknesses are that in-person interviews normally are costly and consume time. Moreover, interviews produce sensitive results, for instance, interviewees can attempt to reveal only that which is culturally suitable. Defective outcomes may surface during the procedure, in cases where inexperienced interviewers are utilized, which can alter the information due to private biases and dismal interviewing abilities. Also, interviewees are most likely not to remember essential data and may miss self-awareness. To add on these, perceived secrecy by participants may be minimal and information research analysis can consume time for open-ended matters and yet actions need approval. About the difficulty in classification of the content involving managerial work, someunity is obvious among the many illustrative techniques, but only at broad categories level or procedures. Most managerial actions can be defined with regards to four common processes which are creating and keeping relations, acquiring and offering information, decision making, and impacting people. These procedures are intertwined among a manager’s actions, and any particular act may include more than one procedure. Even though a lot of descriptive research and analysis on managerial work was not developed to figure out how they may be linked to managerial efficiency, the research analysis does offer some ideas about dealing more successfully with the specifications of managing work. Questionnaires as a research method on managerial work has the strengths of being excellent foraging behavior and prompting other traits from research participants. Questionnaires tend to be affordable, mainly group run questionnaires and mail questionnaires. This strategy can offer details about participants’ inner definitions and ways of reasoning, together with providing possibility models and possess fast turn-around. Questionnaires can be applied to various group categories. Supposed privacy by participant may be great and has reasonably optimum statistic credibility. It is reliable for well-constructed and verified questionnaires. In this strategy, closed-ended matters can offer comprehensive details required by the researcher, and open-ended objects can offer details in respondents’ terminology. Also, there is ease of information examination for closed-ended items and handy for discovery as well as verification. Weaknesses of questionnaires as a strategy that is bound to negatively impact managerial work is that it must be made short and quite often sensitive outcomes may arise. For instance, interviewees might try to reveal only what is culturally suitable and at times be nonresponsive to choosy items. People completing questionnaires may not remember significant statistics and may not have self-awareness and self- attention. The rate of response may be minimal for mail and email questionnaires, and open-ended products may portray variations in spoken ability, blocking the subjects of interest. Research on Teamwork and How It Shapes the Future of Research on Managerial Work Now a day in most companies, managerial stage demands most task undertakings to happen in teams so as to cultivate maximum outcomes. Teams are engrossed and targeted on their identification and personal performances within them. When a group seems confident about their identification and their area, the members project progressively their vigor to the procedures that affect the other members. Teamwork helps individuals in building a group based on negotiation, listening and discussion, being a consensus for making decisions. The development of team work offers a variety that impacts most prevalent management strategies used in today’s business. Team work preferably functions to increase the versatility, creativeness, and efficiency in a company environment. These are principles that are fundamental to molding the future of research analysis on managing work. Complicating this effort, however, is the accumulative level of varying characters existing in numerous places of work, which quite often boosts the trouble of getting individuals to work in unison effectively. The organizations have no option, but to study in order to appreciate and adjust office place work mixture. Most of the particular obligations and resources of team work occur directly out of the different abilities and viewpoints of teams personal associates, including managers. (Hales 1999) points out that team work involve shaving workers from all divisions in the company, from the top management echelons to the lower worker classes, in the offering of services and making of products, cost reduction, and quality enhancement. Compared with personal tasks within the company, the work of a group is to be jointly responsible for setting and achieving the particular objectives for which it was established. While the group functions as a whole unit, each member adds their particular skills and information, attaining own personal goals and taking the group’s initiatives to greater heights of performance. Research on efficient group work should give rise to finding many matters, amongst them, what individualities and background scenes will be an excellent fit that is likely to vary with such factors as project venture, its due date, and available employees. Together with forming of the long run of research on managerial work, one may be required to check out on the group, and methods of how team individuals associate with each other and their performance values. For example, supposing that the best group selected is one that is different and will offer new concepts to the desk. Having individuals that are not conversant with each other can ignite some exciting performance concepts. The comfortable zone is eliminated, and the group has to reason outside of thebox. In circumstances where the group is not well conversant with each other, each can say and work out things that they usually would not if enclosed by acquainted co-workers under an administrator or manager (Raes et al. 2007). As research on group work is performed, It does not matter how cautious one is, the prospects of choosing a team, and establishing tasks and guidelines out of all the projects and initiatives, conflict is most likely to surface. Sometimes conflicts in a group will have the team attempting to make better the concepts till an agreement is arrived at. In this type of a situation, sometimes, the issue that is problematic might be that which can restrict the innovative procedure, and bring about issues between team associates and perhaps be irreversible. This straight away impacts the future of research on managerial work in that it causes there to be a platform whereby a manager will either glow or make it evident that they are incapable of leadership. An excellent manager puts into use various schemes with many other forms of adaptations or methods to suppress the issue before it destroys a potential great group. One such strategy can be to have the two aside, and make them solve the issue amicably so that other teamwork’s progress is not interfered with (Edmondson &Nenbhard2009). Teamwork provides different benefits such as being useful for discovering concepts and ideas, offers a stage for participants’ inner reasoning to be displayed and makes it possible to acquire in-depth details. A system is designed whereby a researcher can analyze how members respond to each other while enabling soul searching. Alot of content can be utilized and enables fast turn-around. Contrariwise, there are disadvantages like at times being costly. It may also be hard to get a group moderator with worthy relationship building abilities. Sensitive and defective results may happen if members feel that they are being viewed or analyzed. Research on teamwork maybe composed of working with a group that is manipulatedwith one or two members. Statistic credibility may be minimal, and details research has a high probability of consuming time due to their open-ended characteristics. All these merits and demerits will directly affect and shape the future of research on managerial work. (Sims 1993) states that the success of the group relies on the individuals’ skills that the manager possesses. Even having the right individuals and right framework to work with, if it happens that the manager is not one that is people-oriented individual, it is likely that this factor alone can cause the group to come to a squealing stop. Even though technological know-how will get one far, abilities and skills in order to relate and interrelate with people is critical. People correspond with individuals, not to the level or abilities that an individual holds. People relational skills are the most critical expertise and ability that any manager can have. Conclusion In any corporate or institute, managers in all ranks need precise and appropriate details for managerial decision making. Whether the choices made are performed at technical, strategic, tactical levels, or at ideal stages. Precise or appropriate details, mostly results in a better choice. Collecting of details and data is undertaken through a sound scientific research process. Every year companies spend huge sums of money for research analysis activities and development so as to keep a competitive advantage. Groups are not always suitable for all companies or in all kinds of businesses. Behavioral researchers are up to date still working and figuring out what exactly will make the team to be most efficient, what encourages members, what kinds of transactions can best profit from the execution of groups, and so on. Philosophical studies on team work and its psychology, view point and mindset of group interaction is still in its infancy. While efficient groups can give out standing results, studies have discovered that approximately fifty percent of self-directed work group send up failing. There lease of effective and constant new technological innovation has significantly affected team work and teams. Combined software and other multi-media alternatives are offering companies with apparatuses to perform group interactions, notwithstanding time and location. New concerns of accountability and responsibility, group framework, and group selection are coming up for management to handle and organize the companies’ overall objectives and goals. But as many more companies are presenting the team idea, the dark spots in the process are being eliminated, and team work reputation is increasing. Many companies are utilizing groups in order to improve efficiency and top quality, and to help fix a range of managerial issues. Workers in groups helps the company remain open and flexible to new concepts and to change. So long as teamwork is viewed as a means of helping the companys ability to meet aggressive difficulties and competitive tests, teamwork will be part and parcel of the corporate world. All these are critical determining factors concerning examination on team work and the manner in which it will shape the future of research on managerial work. References Fells, M. (2000). ‘Fayol stands the test of time’. Journal of Management History, 6(8), pp.345-60. Mintzberg,H.(1990,orig.1990)‘Themanager’sjob:folkloreandfact’.HarvardBusiness Review,Mar-Apr:163-76. Gronn,P.C.(1983)‘Talkasthework:theaccomplishmentof schooladministration’. AdministrativeScienceQuarterly,28,1:1-21. Sims,D.B.P.(1993)‘Theformationoftopmanagers:adiscourseanalysisoffive managerial autobiographies’.BritishJournalofManagement,4:57-68. Watson,T.J.(2001)‘Theemergentmanagerandprocessesof managementpre-learning’. ManagementLearning,32,2:221-35. Waters,J.A.(1980)‘Managerialskilldevelopment’.AcademyofManagementReview,5, 3:449- 53. Edmondson,A.C.andNenbhard,I.M.(2009)‘Product developmentandlearningin projectteams:thechallengesare thebenefits’.JournalofProductInnovation Management,26:123-38. Raes,A.M.L.,Glunk,U.,Heijltjes,M.G.andRoe,R.G.(2007)‘Top management teamand middlemanagersmakingsenseof leadership’.SmallGroup Research,38,3:360-86. Hales,C.(1999)‘Whydomanagersdowhattheydo?Reconciling evidenceandtheoryin accountsof managerialwork’.British JournalofManagement,10:335-50. Kotter,J.P.(1982)‘Whateffectivegeneralmanagersreallydo’.HarvardBusinessReview,60,6: 156- 67. Tengblad,S. (2006)‘Istherea‘newmanagerialwork?’A comparisonwith Mintzberg’s classicstudy30year’slater’. JournalofManagementStudies, 43,7:1437-61. Mathieu,J. Travis,M.,Rapp,T.andGilson,L. (2008)‘Team effectiveness1997-2007:A reviewof recentadvancementsanda glimpseintothefuture’.JournalofManagement, 34:410-76. Read More