Workspace Visibility in the New Economy - Essay Example

The workspace architecture mainly focuses on the improvement of new looks of the workspace, the size of the workspace, and how the workspace aims at improving the lives of people working there (Aubin, 2010). While workspace visibility refers to knowing where things are within the four walls of a given workspace and the purpose that each component serves. It also involves the ability to view things that are beyond the four walls. The main focus of this paper is to analyze the relationship between workspace architecture and workspace visibility.

The relationship that exists between workspace architect and workspace visibility is that workspace architect mainly involves the relationship that exists between humans and space, it is exhibited in form of houses offices, and other forms of structure in which humans work. On the other hand, visibility is the composition of what exists within the four walls of the workspace architecture. This involves both the things that can be observed within the walls and those beyond the walls. Both workspace architect and workspace visibility are based upon the principle of “Build to Last”. This is because most architectural workspaces are not only built to make money but are also built to create a lifetime impression. It is also to act as a legacy to remember someone when they die (Costea, 2014).

Workspace architecture not only aims at creating working, living, and moving environments but also creates environments that are suitable for our own personalities, corresponds to our senses, stimulate our minds, and give us the inspiration and motivation to work. This aims at not only good working conditions but also causes an improvement in the general outcome. But for a workspace architecture to fully satisfy the intended needs, it should be used hand in hand with workspace visibility, if the workspace visibility is easy to manage and solves the specific problems it was intended to solve then the workspace architecture will have good visibility hence it would be effective in the new economy(Kumar, 2007).

The workspace architecture should be cost-effective and economical; it should have the ability to integrate easily into the business protocols and should also be able to accommodate change since the economy is constantly changing. The workspace visibility should also have the ability to accommodate and integrate change that occurs in the workspace architecture, the visibility should be scalable in order to fit into the workspace architectural system so as to enable the system to fit into the current economy.

Workspace visibility and workspace architecture are both new innovations in the field of architecture; the two may be independent but also go hand in hand for an effective architectural impression to exist. A good architectural structure would not be complete if visibility is missing. Both the workspace architecture and workspace visibility have not only improved the design of the workspace but it has also improved the working conditions in the workspace. With an increasingly improving economy, more innovations in the architectural sector are yet to be seen.

New forms of workspace architecture have resulted in improvement in the economy. The increased number of consumers has generally resulted in an improved number of architectural structures coming up. The new workspace architecture has not only improved the design of the workspace but has also improved the working conditions in the spaces and the environment of people working in those places have also changed. With proper management, this can be a great success if properly implemented.