Agile versus Iron Triangle of Waterfall - Essay Example

Agile versus Iron Triangle of Waterfall The success of project management depends not only on the resources but also on the process used. Project management coaches have used a variety of frameworks to simplify the project and train managers on these frameworks for use in project management. Erin, in her lecture, appears to be an evident promoter of the Agile Framework. Having been trained in the framework when she needed it most, Erin gives the difference between the framework and the Iron Triangle framework, another popular option.

In this lecture, Erin identifies the differences between the two frameworks. First, Agile is found to be simpler and easier to follow. The phases of envisioning, speculate, explore, adapt and close flow better in a management process. This is different in the triangle where the interconnection of tasks may result in complexities. Secondly, the triangle represents a correlation between time, cost and output as opposed to the Agile Framework which is more of a process-based framework. As opposed to the Waterfall framework, Agile defines the requirements throughout the project and hence the framework is more flexible.

This means that it allows change in strategy as the project continues.