Revenue and Mitigation - Essay Example

Revenue and Mitigation #Question Close connection and interaction with the community is one of the principalroles of any police department. In the spirit of interaction, members of the community either individually or in form of corporations, usually support the police financially through donations. However, this reliance on donations to raise revenues has become a contentious issue in the contemporary society. This is perhaps due to increased cases of fraudulent solicitation of funds from members of the public by people claiming to be affiliates of police departments (Hess and Orthmann 492).

Apparently, there are advantages and disadvantages associated with donations to the police and they must be weighed effectively, in order to determine the best possible option for effective community policing. One of the principal advantages is that donations can provide the extra revenue needed to fight crime. Further, the sponsorship drives can be used as platforms to enhance community awareness about the crime prevention projects and initiatives that the police are undertaking. Donations can also provide law enforcers with additional opportunities to interrelate with members of the public at social events.

Disadvantageous implications of donations to the police include the donors thinking that they would get preferential treatment in case they break the law. In worst case scenarios, donation could distort priorities of the police, since they might feel obliged to serve donors first (Hess and Orthmann 492-493). Nonetheless, the pros of donations outweigh the cons, and the latter can be overcome with proper regulations in place. It would be possible to capitalize on the public’s good will, while upholding transparency of donations or sponsorship.

For this reason, the police department is inviting community groups, councils and businesses to invest in its projects and initiatives, so as to establish a safer environment for all. The department guarantees that financial assistance received will aid in building and strengthening links with all stakeholders to facilitate crime reporting and prevention. Further, sponsorship will clearly align with the police force’s objectives of supporting cost effective measures to reduce crime. The force will uphold absolute integrity in all its dealings, in a setting of heightened accountability and scrutiny from the public.

# Question 2 Members of any community have a significant role to play in prevention or coping with events that pose danger to their welfare or that of people close to them. Majority of hazard management practitioners appear to have a consensus on the fact that, the principal intention of mitigation is to make sure that fewer individuals and communities fall victim to disasters. The other primary objective of mitigation is to form well built, socially secure, economically stable and environmentally effectual communities, which are not prone to harm caused by hazards.

This task can be accomplished using diverse tools (Haddow, Bullock and Coppola 70). One primary mitigation tool is in-built in design and construction considerations. For instance, during construction, it would be necessary to strictly adhere to building codes and provisions. An excellent example would be to utilize fire retardant material such as slate for roofing, instead of wood, especially in fire prone areas. During landscaping it would also be a safer option to avoid excessive excavation or grading, in order to avoid hazards associated with soil erosion or soil instability.

The other crucial and applicable mitigation tool would be identification and mapping of hazards. This involves use of EIAs and geographical information systems (GIS), among other unsophisticated methods to establish where hazards are likely to occur and their possible impact. This tool can be used to deal with hazards like floods and facilitate execution of proper coping mechanisms (Haddow et al. 71-73). Works CitedHaddow, George, Bullock Jane, and Coppola Damon. Introduction to Emergency Management, (4th ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann. 2010. Hess, Karen, and Orthmann, Christine.

Management and Supervision in Law Enforcement. (6th ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Cengage Learning. 2012.