Organizational culture is fundamentally about symbolic meaning and as such cannot be managed. Discuss - Essay Example

Organizational Culture and Symbolic Meaning Organizational Culture and Symbolic Meaning Organizational culture is fundamentally aboutsymbolic meaning and as such cannot be managed. Discuss.Organizational culture is usually seen in the behavior of personnel. The behavior could be constructive or negative, but still employees display such tendencies. This culture is a representation of symbolic meanings that employees attach to diverse ideals. This implies that the management of organizational culture is challenging in the contemporary cooperate world.

Searching for and using resourcesSearching relevant resources that would aid the execution of this assignment was tasking. This is because it entailed visiting both online and physical libraries. Such visits are significant in this assignment because they create awareness on suitable sources. Apart from this, the visit also guides decisions on choice of theories, authors and exclusion of irrelevant material. After the identification of appropriate assignment material, it was necessary to use such materials in a suitable manner.

Using the resources forces a researcher to engage in in-depth reading to properly analyze ideas (Beard et al 2009, p. 56). Critically engaging the questions set for the essay is possible using several approaches. The initial step is exploring critical texts on the same topic with the intention of making comparisons. Another way of achieving critical engagement is analyzing all components of the question to understand it better. For example, the question for this assignment has three components that include organizational culture, symbolic meaning and management.

Critical engagement requires that one explore the three components of the assignment question (Oleary 2004 p. 84). Evaluation of quality of resourcesEvaluating the quality of sources that one wishes to use is mandatory to attain success in this assignment. One would expect that the books on the reading list would be helpful. This explains why it is fundamental to assess the quality of the suggested books. The evaluation of quality is not simple because it requires knowledge of several scholarly articles.

Quality materials should also be peer reviewed because such sources have been exposed to adequate criticism. This suggests evaluating quality of assignment sources includes confirmations of whether the sources have been peer reviewed. Apart from peer reviews, quality of sources is manifest in the qualification of their authors (Cooper 2004 p. 36).Experienced authors present quality sources that make it easy to complete such assignments at a speedy rate. The quality of sources also depends on the depth of the research that the author takes before producing the book.

This suggests that a book that covers general aspect of management would be inappropriate for this assignment. This is because it would lack intense research on individual topics, for example symbolic meaning. Books that address single topics in the entirety are appropriate than those that cover general aspects of the topic (Accardi, Drabinski, & Kumbier 2010, p. 32). This suggests that reading one book would not be acceptable while executing this assignment. There is a need to explore different books that cover all the component of the research question (Wallace, & Wray 2011, p. 65). Books written by several authors are superior because of the intensity of research.

These books are subjected to several criticisms upon comparison to books written by single authors. This is because the authors who write such books would wish to present quality articles to their readers.Reference List Accardi, M. T., Drabinski, E., & Kumbier, A 2010, Critical library instruction: theories and methods. Duluth, Minn, Library Juice Press.Cooper, H 2004, The handbook of research synthesis. New York, Russell Sage Foundation.Oleary, Z 2004, The essential guide to doing research. London, SAGE.

Roger Beard, Debra Myhill, Jeni Riley, & Martin Nystra 2009, The SAGE handbook of writing development. Thousand Oakes, Calif, SAGE Publications LtdWallace, M., & Wray, A 2011, Critical reading and writing for postgraduates, London, SAGE.