Snooping of Reporters - Essay Example

Even though the information from the news article proves to be true, the reporters responsible can be said to have snooped around the company and gathered that information from people in that company before the company’s CEO officially released the information to the media. If the information was from the press release, then all the news articles and even the company’s website should have the same reporting date.

Could the reporting be fairer? (What would an academic study do differently?)
The reporting could not be fairer because the reporters of this information did not follow the correct, reliable and verifiable route of gathering information and it could have been misreported because the sources of the information were not credible. It is also not fair that the reporter of this news article gets to snoop around and get this information earlier than other reporters. This is more so because it casts doubt on the credibility of other news articles on this website and on the internet in general. The credibility of the company is also put to test and this is not fair.

If the source was to be an academic study, then issues of scientific review should have been considered. This means that the credibility of the article should be able to be verified by other sources and that every part of that article should be matching with the original source of the news and with other sources and news articles as well.
An academic study news report should also be reliable. This means that there should not be any doubt of the information when its source is scrutinized by other academicians who are mostly scientifically granted the authority to render the information reliable. If the reliability and validity of the information cast a shadow of a doubt as to it being scientific and peer-reviewed, then it can qualify to be academic study information.

What do you think are the issues not discussed in the article?
The article does not explain in detail the reasons why the companies which were to merge decided to pull out of the deal at the last minute despite the deal having been formulated and agreed upon over several months before the news. The article just gives a few details and hence the reader cannot really understand what is going on really among the three accounting firms.

According to the news article in question, no information has been offered about when or what the companies have to do in the future in order to be able to get back to the deal in question since originally it was a good idea that has to proceed. Without this important piece of information, the readers of this article, therefore, continue to remain in the dark about that important piece of information. Read More