Leadership and Well-Performing Teams - Case Study Example

The Varsity team losing to the junior team is a significant concern. Members abhor each other hence lessening cooperation among the crewmembers. The reason for this loss is the deficiency of leaders who ought to coordinate and provide a sense of direction to the players (Snook and Jeffrey 31). The presence of disruptive persons in the team is also a major concern since nobody wants to sacrifice for the team. The crew team was rated in terms of weaknesses and strengths, which complimented the manager as a team leader

Alternatives

The coach, Preczewskis, is in a quandary; thus, making a decision among three options. He was to decide on whether to exchange both the junior university and Varsity boats. The other option was to switch the boat members in an individual capacity. The last option was to improve the output performance of the university boat.

Action and implementation plan

Well-performing teams do not only prosper because of combining members’ skills but also through motivating and energizing members through bonding hence striving towards a general goal. Teams that are poorly designed amount to wasting time and resources. A need arises to enhance communication; thus, keeping each member well informed to avoid communication breakdown (Snook and Jeffrey 46) Constant meetings enable members of the teams to portray grievances that will boost the achievements of the team. In this forum, consultations and participation should be evident to allow everyone to give useful information. This will provide room for accommodation of each person’s view. Trust is a virtue that must be cultivated because most of the crewmembers doubted each other.

Conclusion

Constant criticism acts as an avenue for mistrust amongst members; thus, causing failure in performance. Dialogue is the solution and all the members of the team must embrace decision-making.