Features of Administrative Leadership and Successful Relationship with the Institution - Research Proposal Example

?FEATURES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LEADERSHIP AND SUCCESSFUL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE Summary The proposed study focused on administrative leadership and the role of leadership in general in bringing about the successful running of educational institutions. More specifically, the researcher focused on the role of successful relationship with institutions and how this situation can ensure that the leader succeeds in his quest to building a great and strong institution. As part of the study, which was conducted using quantitative research method, a number of specific objectives were set, out of which research questions were posed. Using the specific objectives and research questions as a scope for the study, secondary data were collected using the review of related literature. As part of the literature review therefore, the specific objectives were changed into thematic topics, under which the literature review took place. Some of the major findings that were made from the literature review touched on areas such as the general definition and meaning of administrative leadership and organizational relationship, leadership styles that works best in promoting effective relationship with the institutions, challenges faced in implementing an all inclusive institutional leadership, and benefits for using administrative leadership to enrich the relationships that exists within the institution. The proposed study also involves primary data collection, which requires the researcher to set up a research setting, from which data shall be collected from a group of respondents. The generalized reason for having such primary data collection in place was to ensure that the data that were collected from secondary sources were compared with real life situations to confirm their authenticity and accuracy. Generally, the primary data collection was also focused on the need to have an action research that would ensure that a primary is identified within a localized setting and attempted to be solved by use of an intervention. In this instance, the problem to be identified was a leadership crisis situation that was making organizational cohesion difficult for an identified institution. The intervention on the other hand was to be the introduction of the administrative leadership style, which involves and enhances effective participation between the leader and other people on the administrative staff. The primary data collection is thus proposed to take place to take place within one specific educational organization. As part of the primary data collection, various methodological approaches were followed. In the first place, the sample size was developed. This was proposed to be done by selecting a group of employees from the institution that was to be used as the research setting. These people will be tasked to respond to a self-administered questionnaire that contains questions focusing on the research objectives and the research questions to be used for the study. With questions focusing on various leadership styles and leadership skills in place at the institution, key issues of leadership that did not promote successful relationship with the institution and ways of correcting these were to be identified. The data collection process is to be followed with data analysis, which is also expected to take a quantitative approach. What this means is that the researcher shall make use of various mathematical formulas and indexes that will ensure the empirical interpretation of data. 2-Abstract This proposal focused on the impact of administrative leadership in bringing about effective relationship in the institution. Data collection was change oriented as it focused on leadership crisis and ways of improving it. Ahead of this, secondary data had been collected using the critical review of literature. Key ways used in the study included: leadership, change, interpersonal relationship, democratic leadership, leadership style, delegation, conflict management, shared responsibility, competency training, training and development. 3-Critical review of the literature Works conducted by Tushman and Nadler (2009) on administrative leadership concluded that administrative leadership is ideal for the promotion of organizational relationship and makes leadership a share practice. This is because according to Van de Ven (2011), administrative leadership gives the leader the freedom to be dynamic in changing between one leadership style and the other. For example the leader will be free to shuffle between democratic leadership and delegation leadership, as and when the need for one of these comes up. These findings are related to the proposed study and will contribute to the intention of using administrative leadership to bring about positive administrative changes in the identified institution. 4- Designing a self-administered questionnaire A self-administered questionnaire will be designed for a group of respondents from the research setting. These are to be made up of questions that are developed directly from the research questions for the study. The questionnaire is expected to form a major part of the quantitative data collection exercise as it is expected to contain close ended questions that will aid in the empirical analysis of results. With an average of six research questions, it is expected that each of them will be extended to five questions to give a total of 30 questions on the questionnaire. 5-Methodology The research shall be conducted using a case study research design. This form of research design allows the researcher to identify a specific situation that exists within an identified research setting for critical studies and analysis. The research setting shall be an educational institution where a random sampling technique shall be used to sample twenty (20) respondents, all of who are expected to be workers in the institution. The selection of the sample size shall involve the use of a fish bowl method to ensure that there is fairness with the selection process. 6-Current state of the problem The current state of the problem in the identified institution is one that has to do with leadership crisis, which often brings about cases of organizational conflict and organizational unrest. It has been observed that the educational institution in question practices an authoritarian leadership style that allows for limited staff and employee involvement. Because of this, the relationship between leadership and the institution is not the best. This project is being initiated as a solution to the problem by introducing administrative leadership to the institution as an intervention to their problem. 7-Basic objectives The entire study is supposed to be conducted under the following rationale 1. To investigate the impact of the current leadership style being practiced at the institution 2. To identify loopholes associated with the need for there to be cordial relationship between leadership and institution as a whole 3. To find out the major aspects of administrative leadership that makes it ideal for solving the problem within the identified setting 4. To identify the role that can be played by all stakeholders within the institution to make the implementation of the administrative leadership a successful one 5. To find various challenges that come with the institutionalization of the administrative leadership 6. To investigate the benefits that comes with the use of administrative leadership. 8-Structure of the project. There shall be five major part or divisions of the study as outlined below 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background to the Study 1.2 Purpose of the study 1.3 Aim and Objectives 1.4 Rationale for the study 1.5 Significance of the Study 1.6 Research questions 1.7 Limitations to the Study 2.0 Literature Review 3.0 Methodology 3.1 Research Method 3.2 Research design 3.3 Population and Sample 3.4 Sampling and Sampling Design 3.5 Primary data collection 3.6 Secondary Data Collection 3.7 Data Analysis Plan 4.0 Data Analysis 5.0 Conclusion 5.1 Summary 5.2 Conclusion 5.3 Recommendation References Tushman ML and Nadler DA. Organizing for innovation. California Management Review 2009; 28(3):74–92. Van de Ven AH. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science 2011;32:590–607. Read More