Summative assessment - critical assessment of the external and internal contexts of management - Essay Example

Howe and Strauss (2003) rightly pointed out that young people and communities are raised in relatively secure and objective driven environment in comparison to their previous generations. Howe and Strauss (2003) also pointed out that lesser numbers of siblings at home (in comparison to previous generations) has decreased the magnitude of competitive environment there. On the other hand, in external environment, young people and communities are being encouraged by family members to participate in competitions and gather accomplishments (Alsop, 2008).

It is evident from the discussion that young people and communities have certain personal traits such as, low loyalty, urge for working in team, more focus on knowledge sharing and over-dependence on technology. Therefore, organisations need to consider the above-mentioned traits while managing young people and community. Apart from the mentioned aspects of young people and community management, primary agenda for the essay is to evaluate Sue Lea’s quote “this policy climate severely limits the capacity of leaders to lead” mentioned in Ord (2012, p. . ntioned text, management and leadership are being used interchangeably but in reality, significant amount of difference exist between both these concepts.

Therefore, the line should be read as, potential and scope for managing young people and community within or outside organization gets affected by government policies, external environmental issues and dynamic shift in macro environment. Although, there are research scholars who have criticized the mentioned argument and the essay will cover their criticism in order to make the discussion robust. In the next section, the researcher will shed light on management-leadership perspectives in order to develop background for further discussion.

Management & Leadership Kotter (2001) stated that stark differences exist between managers and leaders. For example, managers are those people who are responsible for doing the assigned task, planning operational activities, budgeting, organizing resources to achieve organizational objectives, problem solving and controlling the action of team members or department members, while leaders are those who motivate, align and direct the subordinate’s action. Internal conflict between leadership and management can be summarized in the following manner: Vision and Objective Management is concerned with planning, budgeting, establishing process steps, setting project time line and manager’s ability to display an impersonal attitude.

Leadership is concerned with establishment of direction, vision, developing strategic plans, display of passionate attitude and motivating team members to achieve the performance objectives (Kotterman, 2006). Human Development and Networking Management is concerned with delegating responsibility to staff at different organizational verticals, implementing