The Long Arm Statute is a state law allowing the state to exert jurisdiction upon a defendant who is an out-of-state, as long as the prospective defendant has enough minimum contacts with the state of forum. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
Jurisdiction over a defendant who is out-of-state is often known as extraterritorial personal jurisdiction or personam jurisdiction which permits a court to exert jurisdiction upon an individual. It is always an important requirement for a given court to listen to the merits of claims alleged. Going by the history, a given state had the capability of exercising its jurisdiction within its territorial limits. For that reason, a defendant who is nonresident was brought to court when the delivery of writ or summons (service of process) was settled while the defendant in question was within the state boundaries (Parness 486). In Adamson’s case, he lives in Idaho with his children who happened to have made an order of Makers Mark from Kentucky. Can Adamson serve the company with a “long arm service of process” and bring the case back to Idaho for court action? Adamson can serve the company with the long arm service of process so that the case can be taken back to Idaho. However, Kentucky would be ideal for handling the cases despite the fact that Adamson’s family hailed from Idaho, and had minimal contact with the forum state. In this case, Makers Mark was searched through the Internet and for that reason; there was ‘certain minimum contacts’ during the process....
However, Idaho is ideal for the hearing of the case as the defendants hail from the state and would be better placed to access the courts as opposed to going all the way to Kentucky. The best state for forum and review of the case would be Kentucky though with minimum contact, is the place to follow up the case as the transaction was done within the state. The fact that there was certain minimum contact was enough a reason to adopt the in Kentucky (Adams). Which state law from the two states should the Judge use? The judge will use the Kentucky state law which states that: A court may exert personal jurisdiction upon a person acting directly or through an agent as to claims emanating from the person’s conducting any business in this Commonwealth. The “person” in this case refers to an individual, administrator, his executor, any personal representative, partnership, association, corporation, or any other commercial or legal entity, who happens to be a non resident of the state (Parness 487). In this case Adamson is not the person that committed the act, but his children who acted as his representatives. They made the transaction on his behalf and are liable for legal action within Kentucky state statutes and laws. Explain the written law and your reasons. Analyze the written law in relation to this case, explain current case law and reach a conclusion as a judge Because the person (Adamson’s representatives) made an Internet search, this means that there was, in deed, certain minimum contact with the state. Secondly, the person also made calls and enquires and would later manage to convince the company through calls and fax that they were of the right age to make the transaction. The defendant has breached the Kentucky statute by
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“The Long Arm Statute Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
The Long Arm Statute Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1468508-case
(The Long Arm Statute Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
The Long Arm Statute Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/management/1468508-case.
“The Long Arm Statute Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1468508-case.
It employs over 2000 people and has offices around the globe including state of the art design centers based in the U.S., France, India, Sweden and Taiwan. It follows a unique business model (Figure 1) whereby it licenses IP to a wide network of partners, comprising of firms which are pioneers in the supplying of semiconductors and systems (ARM Holdings, 2012a).
society. Once the parliament has made the laws, the judicial arm of the government has the responsibility of applying the statute in cases brought in court. However, some of the laws made by parliament sometimes pose a big challenge to judges, especially where the statute law is ambiguous, has an error, or failed to factor in unforeseen developments (Solan 2010, p.
Many a theorists have ignored or denied the distinction based on consent. Stanley Hoffman is among the one who denies the 'definitional importance' of consent. In his essay "The Politics and Ethics of Military Intervention" he says that he does not see intervention in the context of consent because to him the consent is not always voluntary or genuine as the consent, granted in the beginning may turn into resentment.
The author states that Statue of Fraud ensures that a written agreement exists between two parties in certain types of contracts described previously in this paragraph. He has described that the Statue of Fraud requires that certain contracts be in writing and that they are to be signed by all parties to be bound by the contract.
In recent times, the comparative law entails study of the different legal systems in existence in the world, including the international law, socialist law, constitutional law, cyber law, civil law, common law, Islamic law, Chinese law, and Hindu law.
Over the years the study of comparative law has achieved pragmatic substance for two reasons.
Acorn (or later Advanced) RISC Machine (ARM) uses a 32-bit RISC (reduced instruction set computing) processor architecture that is utilized within many different applications. ARM processors are widely circulated, since their design integrates novel power-saving consumption and high performance features that adapt as part of the application design.
In most cases, the authority of any given government to exercise extraterritorial jurisdiction in other states and countries can only be realized through legal agreements with the authorities covering the particular states.
v. Wash., 326 U.S. 310, 316 (U.S. 1945), the Supreme Court held that in order to subject a defendant to an out of state judgment, the defendant has to have sufficiently substantial contacts with the plaintiff. In the case of Adamson, it is evident that the
The long arm statute allows courts to have jurisdiction over companies and people in other states, although this is limited. The personal jurisdiction limits determine where individuals are to be tried based on connections and residence, meaning a court in Colorado cannot make a resident of Mexico, for example, to come to court in Colorado.
In 1 (b), the client can file a suit in Indiana court without necessarily having to go to Ohio. According to the Long Arm Statute, a State can exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-State defendant provided that the requirements of the Sufficient
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"The Long Arm Statute"
with a personal 20% discount.