Reflective review 'Making informed decision' - Essay Example

Research and practical assistance are provided in this reformation center to strategize its intervention for those needing its assistance and support. To realize its programs, quality staffs are hired to provide quality services for children under its care and custody. Child protection and welfare topped as its priority agenda, especially those serving their sentences as child offenders based on the national policy and the enforcement of international rights of the child. The justice center is likewise in observance to the juvenile justice system which limits the standard age of child’s criminal liability at ten years old but the state qualified that those children between 10 to 14 years old, there is a refutable presumption that they are incapable of forming criminal intent to make them instantly guilty of committing a crime (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, p. 1) This is handled and managed by separate laws, process and court jurisdiction for children.

Children are therefore brought under the custody of the Justice Center in relation to the result of the judgement rendered following their prosecution out of the offense committed or they are subject for alternative proceedings based on the nature of the allegations and the capacity of the child to respond to the case (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, p. 1). Aside from this, the justice courts also afford child protection, like in cases when they suffer from abuses or if the child is the lone witness to criminal cases.

This is a mandatory function of the center to ensure the child’s welfare and to veer them from significant harm (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, p. 1). This includes children who are suffering from severe problems on trafficking, slavery, sexual servitude, deceptive recruiting and exploitation (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, p. 1). As of these days, the institution is challenged with the increasing number of juveniles under its custody and the limited number of quality staff that can provide responses to their needs.

Thus, the management proposed to purchase monitoring technology and to mount these in the bedrooms of the children. So how does informed decision-making be done in this case? As of 2012, the statistics of juveniles in Australia sentenced by court has reached the figures of 2,537 in New South Wales, 737 from Victoria, 815 in Queensland, 532 from South Australia, 108 in Tasmania and 154 in Australian Capital Territory (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, p. 1) . There are no records from Western Australia and in Northern Territory.

Data further bared that the detention rate per 1,000 children aging 10-17 years old are 3.2 in New South Wales, 0.8 in Victoria, 1.7 in Queensland, 3.0 in South Australia, 1.8 in Tasmania and 4.3 in Australian Capital Territory (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, p. 1). In an average rate, Australia has 2.5% youth rate detention. The rate of indigenous children under detention is also different. In New South Wales, there are 29.5 rate per 1,000 children are detained as of 2012, 11.

6 in Victoria, 14.4 in Queensland, 33.7 in South Australia, 5.6 in Tasmania and 57.0 from Australian Capital Territory (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2012, p. 1). Considering these figures, staffs of the Judicial Center will certainly find exhausting difficulties in