Organizational Systems and Style - Essay Example

? Annotated Bibliography of Organizational Systems and Style Romagnoli, P. D. (2006). Increasing effectiveness in training and doctrine command (TRADOC). Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a450914.pdf This article has been written by MAJ Paul D. Romagnoli (US army). This report shows enhancing effectiveness in Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC). This particular article focuses on the TRADOC organization, different functions and structural theory that are believed to support the organizational structure. The article also clearly mentions the mission and functions as well as the recent organizational structure and the reasons behind the formation of TRADOC. The structural theory narrates about the entire TRADOC’s organizational construction, which is classified as a traditional hierarchy created in the United States in the early 20th century. In relation to the organization, the article mentions the overall role and responsibilities of TRADOC and also offers an insight in the process of Organizing, Recruiting, Supplying, Mobilizing, Training and Constructing in regard to the military equipment. The main concern of this article is the issues relating to the environment of military, political and internal operation and the ways of overcoming these issues. It also lists the ways and manners of enhancing the effectiveness of the external work operation by ‘Hypothetical Course of Action’ (HCA). The article evidently mentions the increasing efficiency of the overall work system with the application of HCA. The article provides a complete picture of the functions of the entire organizational structure. It helps readers comprehend the complete work process and techniques of TRADOC organization. This article offers information related to the role, functions and responsibilities of the TRADOC organization, which is quite helpful for the researchers for their future studies. Defense Technical Information System. (1994). A concept for the evolution of full dimensional operations for the strategic army of the early twenty-first century. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA314276+ This article mentions the challenges of TRADOC organization likely to be witnessed in future and suggests changes which need to be done with regard to the strategy as well as technology in an upcoming dynamic world. This article offers details regarding the type of characteristics that are supposed to be required for the army in order to fight future battles and address future threats. The nature of the expected future challenges is explained in this article along with the ways of strategically dealing with them with the aid of fresh technologies. This article explains the theoretical structure in relation to the US Army’s constant development towards the future. It states about the ‘Force XXI’, which is a strategic army and subsists to meet the requirement of the nation’s security. The tasks of this particular army are found to be centered on leadership and quality soldiers possessing effective potential, which is more closely recognized through innovative information technologies. The article also provides an account of the predetermined full-dimensional functions of ‘Force XXI’. Basically this article demonstrates the ways in which the US Army will function in the future to achieve its missions and where control over the land is perceived to be necessary to attain success. The article narrates the theoretical foundation for the conduct of operations in future wars. In this article, the US Army is described to be active in the form of Army National Guard, Army Reserves and Department of Army Civilians. It offers information about the TRADOC’s Task Force XXI, doctrine writers, battle developers, combat laboratories and trainers. Moreover this article entails a vision of future TRADOC for the development of sustaining concepts, initiatives, experiments and strategies for upcoming wars. Moreover, this article highlights the entire TRADOC components: headquarters, their staffs, chief subordinate commands and operational centers. This particular article provides information about TRADOC’s operational styles and strategies to the researchers. Department of the Army United States of America. (19 Aug 2010). The United States Army operating concept. Retrieved from http://www.tradoc.army.mil/tpubs/pams/tp525-3-1.pdf This article explains the entire operating techniques of the US Army. It describes the ways in which the army forces are believed to perform their respective operations as a part of combined forces to prevent conflict, succeed in war and win through a wide range of emergencies in the upcoming operational environments. It focuses on the aspect of employment of the army forces in the future time periods of 2016-2028 in the context of the tactical and operational levels of war. Furthermore, this article broadly describes the approaches through which the army headquarters direct and systematize the employment of their forces. The concept of this article underlines the major divisions with regard to the army operations and recognizes the necessary capabilities that are required for army forces to direct and prioritize their future development. The ideas described in this article relate to the overall style of the army doctrine, TRADOC organization as well as their training facilities, education materials and personnel leadership styles. This article provides an understanding regarding the concept of the army’s theoretical framework, which was initiated in the later quarters of 2009. The construct in relation to “The Army Capstone Concept” on the basis of strategic vision is also encompassed in this article. It even offers effectual details and recommends modifications regarding the roles and responsibilities of the US Army. Furthermore, this article serves as an essential guide for the expansion of aspects such as subordinate, operational war fighting concepts, movement, aptitude, protection as well as arms, tactics and sustainment. The article, in essence, reports the expansion of future forces on the basis of development, provides succeeding supporting concepts, explains the notion of strategic capability and the ‘Joint Capabilities Integration’ (JCI) along with illustrating the perception of systematic development procedure in operational tasks. This article can immensely aid the researchers in their studies as it offers a lucid idea about the style of the entire TRADOC organizational work procedure and strategic capabilities of the US Army forces. United States Army Training and Doctrine Command. (20 July 2010). Organization and functions headquarters, U.S. army training and doctrine command. Retrieved from http://www.tradoc.army.mil/tpubs/regs/r10-5-1.pdf This article is found to describe and outline the TRADOC organization system by providing details regarding the mission, functions and purposes of the ‘Headquarters (HQ) of the US Army TRADOC’. This article fundamentally highlights the details with regard to integrating the restructuring of the TRADOC HQ into General Staff, development of ‘Centers of Excellence’ (CoE), and the decisions taken under the establishment of ‘TRADOC Campaign Plan’ (TCP). The discussion of this article concentrates on the development of organizational relationships related to TRADOC CoE and ‘Human Capital Enterprise’ (HCE). Moreover, this article explains the entire TRADOC system and structure pertinent to the commandant group, deputy commanding generals, personal staffs, deputy chief staff and their individual roles and functions at each level. This article also entails TRADOC’s core competencies and functions, which help them prepare for future operations. Therefore, this article may prove valuable for future studies as it provides details about the TRADOC structure and functions at every individual level. Read More