Parties to the Alaskan Conflict - Essay Example

Furthermore, there have been economic interests and the increasing need for fuel or oil which can essentially prevail over environmental concerns. This issue of drilling in the ANWR also stimulates a number of moral issues, which arise from the dispute between a practical standpoint on the drilling and ecological concerns. The subject of oil drilling in Alaska is a significant source of concern to the local populace as well as the local wildlife. Additionally, this subject also concerns the entire state and the whole continent.

However, the number of decision makers involved in the matter is extremely limited, and the public has a minor effect on the final deliberation that can be adopted. Nonetheless, it is barely probable to undervalue the importance of the civic opinion, but it is mainly utilized by the political contenders, the Democrats as well as the Republicans who have the lawmaking and administrative supremacy in America and; consequently, they are real decision makers. The dispute between the Democrats and the Republicans is based on the fact that, the Democrats contest to the drilling while the latter are supporters of the fuel drilling.

With this context, the moral question arises: whether the law makers should utilize the drilling in the ANWR as part of their massive political game or, possibly they should permit the public to make the deliberation. In addition, there is the query of whether the local populace should be allowed to decide on this issue. This implies that, the subject of drilling should not be made a political issue. Nonetheless, the subject should be a scientific, ecological research concerning its effect on the ecology.

The parties to the Alaskan dispute, consequently, include political contenders, the local populace, regular Americans, the international society, oil companies and ecologists. What are the Triggers of the Conflict? There are varied triggers to the Alaskan conflict the significant ones being the economic benefits associated with the oil drilling, the issue of safeguarding natural resources, as well as political interference. The continuing energy problem, as well as the United State’s battle on terror has also stimulated the subject of fuel supply in the nation.

This has, consequently, evoked the dispute with regard to oil drilling in Alaska. Environmentalists assert that the refuge is significant for wildlife. Destruction of this crucial Wildlife Refuge will rip land utilized by polar bears and approximately 180 bird species as well as an enormous number of wandering animals. Oil drilling in this area would defy the entire purpose of the refuge. Styles of Conflict Management In resolving the Alaskan dispute, it is crucial to include all stakeholders in the decision making procedure.

The stakeholders include the local populace, regular Americans, government officials and environmentalists among others. The issues of environment always influence people beyond borders and; therefore, it is extremely crucial to include international bodies in the negotiation process. It is also crucial to involve the local populace in the process, although, they will not obtain any economic advantages from the oil drilling. In stark distinction, the local populace and the commonplace Americans will suffer from the degradation of the environment and; consequently, it will