Enteprenuership and Organizational Behavior - Essay Example

? ENTREPRENUERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR Table of Contents 1 Systematically Analyse the Concept of Entrepreneurialism 4 2 Critically Evaluate Entrepreneurialism as an Agent of Change in Both Public and Private Health and Social Care Sector 5 1.3 Critically and systematically analyze culture in organizations and evaluate its fundamental importance to organizational success 7 1.4 Discuss the fundamental importance of collaborative working and its primary purpose in making more efficient use of staff, systems and processes. 8 1.4.1 Collaborative working Analysis 10 1.5 Analyze the critical issue of change resistance and how to overcome it. 12 1.6 Examine the demographic trends and the key aspect of the social environment 16 Demography and Epidemiology 16 A. Elements which impinge upon the work of the enterprise and the national and local sources of demographic and epidemiological data 18 B. A whole new consumer healthcare segment is emerging 18 References 19 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The major roles within which management would be established is through a procedural establishment of management changeovers. The attributes are explained through ways that healthcare management would understand and more convincingly would be its new inventions and new technological growths. Pavlov, (2000) explains the stimulating factors that propelled the organization to make specific management change classification and most notably, the most active process which would determine the impact of change on future aspects of change expectations. This study therefore seeks to establish adequate principles and approaches needed to accomplish the relevant ambitious trends. 1.1 Systematically Analyse the Concept of Entrepreneurialism The entrepreneur is an individual or group who is keen to abide by the risks of organising, operating as well as assuming the possibilities for a business venture in order to build capital either through profits (in case of profit earning organisations/companies) or through funds (in case of non-profit institutions). From a generalised perspective, entrepreneurialism can be denoted as one of the effective entrepreneurial cultures deliberately contributing towards various social development activities. Entrepreneurship today is extensively involved with the transforming ideas concerning economic growth of a society or a country at large. They are risk takers, who look forward to undertake any challenge or task without any hesitation. There are certain numbers of characteristics that are involved with the effectiveness of entrepreneurs, such as self confidence, sense of ownership, continuous learning skills, communication abilities, goal and system oriented cognitive skills and dedication towards the objectives with an optimistic point of view, among others. Among the various notable entrepreneurs of this era, Lord Alan Sugar has been one. Born in East London, he worked against all odds to be a member at the House of Commons and to hold 89th position in the Sunday Times Rich List of 2011. Amstrad has been his most successful venture. 1.2 Critically Evaluate Entrepreneurialism as an Agent of Change in Both Public and Private Health and Social Care Sector. In the modern day context of healthcare and social organizations, the entrepreneurs are highly inclined towards gaining increased revenue or profit for the organization. However, social enterprises now-a-days entail certain significant attributes related to the governmental public policies. The enterprises of the globalised world focusing on a developed entrepreneurship are different from traditional and socio-economic approaches which motivated the European countries to adopt developed legal frameworks. The contemporary scenario of healthcare organizations is necessary to be conscious of the environmental changes, also to implement suitable plans and strategies for the organization, concentrated on its social benefits. Significant plans along with the appropriate strategies are more effective for the organization to put up internal strengths along with external opportunities, taking into account the surmounting peripheral threats as well as interior weaknesses posed by the concern. For instance, in the context of health and social care divisions of UK, it has been observed that current circumstances have increased the requirements for more efficient cost control strategies. The reasons behind such inclination relate to the reduction in government’s financial support to the sector, involvement of private firms as well as expansion of National Health Service (NHS) (Department of Health, 2009). Therefore, in the modern phenomenon, UK based healthcare organisations within the private sector as well as public sector continue to strive for achieving the competitive advantages through cost-limitation and growth sustainability. The strategic decisions are the crucial factors which can have long-term effects on the prospects of an organization with regards to its utilization of resources, organizational influence to the environment and stakeholders, its competencies and similar socio-economic factors. Hence, the services offered by such organisations must include quality assurances which include effective understanding along with critical evaluation of quality management practices. It is in this context that the innovation brought by these organisations constitutes a suitable design of the organisational process, including updated technologies along with the involvement of appreciation models and the concept of value accumulating method with performance measurement systems (Tapp, 2012). In this regards, the UK government is focused on developing the healthcare enterprises as one of the major and vigorous social enterprise sectors. The new approach of social enterprises focuses on the enhancement of the diversity of provisional facilities, along with increasing competition level among the NHS organisations as an innovative measure towards development. It is in this context that the innovative approach of NHS organisations attempts to encourage the private sector healthcare service providers to compete with its process which is intensely focused on developing a competitive environment and encourage innovative measures with due consideration to the ethical responsibilities of such institutions (Marks and Hunter, 2011). Therefore, the approach encourages a significant enhancement on the sustainability, modernism, service and community empowerment along with the encouragement of user and staff involvement with the aim to ensure that the local communities acquire responsibilities and appropriate systems towards better health control (Tapp, 2012). In order to stimulate an effective form of entrepreneurship within the public sector, the inconsistency, uncertainty of purpose and objectives are considered as the crucial factors by the healthcare and social institutions in UK with due consideration to the encouragement of flexibility and opportunity for the development of social well-being. The Modernisation Agenda of the UK government has been implemented with an aim to guide a quick and rapid improvement with regards to the need for innovative entrepreneurial reactions concerning the social responsibilities of the healthcare and social organizations, along with economic trends and technological enrichments (Department of Health, 2009). 1.1 Critically and systematically analyze culture in organizations and evaluate its fundamental importance to organizational success Organizational culture involves behavioral patterns and standards which enhance the performance of an organization. The attributes are defined by changing components aiding the aspect of fragility, performance levels and productivity, (Swan et al, 1999). However, both Sounders et al, (2000) and Mayer et al, (1995) explain that the specific cultural models are built through generations. Productivity factors offer substantial conduits for successful entrepreneurs and the shorter climatic developments are virtually constructed through evidenced productivity life-cycle. The effective organizational culture is an attribute of a comprehensive managerial organ and its frameworks involve the management and the productivity processes. The ultimate nature of growth is also a changing phenomenon that establishes a complete remedy for overlooking a positive trend in the performance capability. Equally, Mayer et al, (1995) explore new ways that management is established, noting that goal setting and absolute identification of critical paths could be subjected to innovative and styled techniques. The cultural functions are implicated by creating active reasoning through changing platforms in organizational thinking, productivity and quality controls. While the cultural values establish a positive feedback, Sounders et al, (2000) underlines the general behavioral patterns that test the viability and strength of organizational growth. The influential content of organizational objectives is derived from an aspect of good management, process viability and shared values. The systemic inclusion of a coping style also generates internal integration and this generates a substantial level of problem solving framework, (Park et al, 2004). Organizational culture is uniquely established on invisible dimensions. Equally, the visible cultural dimensions are espoused by knowledge sharing principles, and interpersonal trust which also aids organizational success factors, (Ali, 1999). Communication provides a highly interactive service connection that creates a perfect environment for knowledge transfer. Ideally, it involves transforming people and creating connectedness between complicated managerial layers and organizational structural support. 1.4 Discuss the fundamental importance of collaborative working and its primary purpose in making more efficient use of staff, systems and processes. Collaborative working is one important factor that organizations seek to apply in its attempt to improve their performances. This supports the general processes of creating sustaining overhauls in structural developments within an institution. Basically, the addressed factors revolve around changes made both internally and externally within and about the business. The illustrations as well as the altered functions are all derived from increased changeovers. In view of the general factors pictured as per the defined objectives, the question of highlighting the improvement strategies allows the organization to periodically create universal list of events that make up its success. Organizational efforts to have a well organized mechanism has been viewed from its organizational re-establishment and in fact, the systemic changeover through which efforts are based on added strategic pattern has generally showed that the prospects of implementing strategic steps would be controlled internally by key derivatives including organization’s operational system as well as improved management of the asset base. The emphasis of the major steps within the organizational advancement has shown that certain difficulties are faced while attempting to make inroads into the overall general of the focus which supports changeovers in business establishments. Better planning techniques are foreseen almost in major components of development and this lists what is creatively accepted as structures in practice which practically support organizational strategic implementation, (Aranda and Fernandez, 2002). 1.4.1 Collaborative working Analysis Collaborative working within the streams of a business is measured according to key technical tools which quantify organizational to create an effective management platform. This provides certain levels of sustainability options that are in themselves ideally measured through sustainable form of actions and the process define how exactly strategic implementation could derived and factored. As such the displacement ratio in which the company works on collaborative display characteristics of efficiency in the form factor and this lists the implications of business practices through which precise marketing and better practices are well by noting such measures as winning strategies and having adequate facilitation that has sustainable means of creating metrical focusing in the organization’s strategic system, (Cabrera and Cabrera, 2002),. In the effectiveness of the survey models, the measure through which additional literature is kept within the cycle of revolution creates acceptable information portals which clearly indicate how well the structural definition is sustained. 1.4 Analyze the critical issue of change resistance and how to overcome it. The component that conceptually characterizes the change in organizational management at the very basic level enlightens key strategic elements that decompose themselves through the procedural factors aiding the integrity of the company’s managerial system and further confirmation about its ability to adhere to operational challenges (Connelly. and Kelloway, 2003). The practicability of major management inputs which organizations have experimentally defined on the wake of change competitions and improved production innovations through behavioural variables and constants reveals a correlative assessment of people’s wants and in practice, these associations explains the amount of changes that organizations need in order to meet these demands. Scholz, (1990) explains the technical risks and behavioural approaches disseminated at equivalent levels to sustain management change and establish important values which continually create a force for change. The influences of key factors cased as per organizational strategy show elements that create force for change, and the critical measures as reflected by change risks and influential actors explain the guiding principles within which the drivers naturally operate. The key factor in change management is organizational marketing opportunities which generate the holistic models (Connelly and Kelloway, 2003) that offer distinct personalization of customer management strategies and factored marketing theories. The key choices miniaturized as per organizational management component is aimed at achieving a rapid marketing platform. Notably, the key problem faced reveals a competing environment within which an established change initiative is determined, (Field, 2000) 1.5 Examine the demographic trends and the key aspect of the social environment An organization is able to satisfactorily implement its strategies through sustainable business reorganization, and in practice, moves related to getting an achievable trend is satisfactorily based on long term efforts. This has adequately enlightened the process through which the firm can get restructured without affected its customer base and further without creating critical failures. As augmented above, the contemporary nature through which organizations get established implies that they grow at a robust speed all the time. In broad terms, organizations benefit from environmental conditions set by changing systems such as political and economic factors. Connelly and Kelloway, (2003) have argued that behavioral relationships generated by organizational virtual gains are both multicultural and factually relevant to societal developments. Social and cultural diversities are dynamically established through attitudes and behaviors that are reflected by the lifestyles that people and organizational generate, (Ali, 1996). The contemporary society has been institutionalized according to Ford, (2001) and the numerous study illustrations have ideally pictured the development of education through a more formal transfer system. As such, the social environment classification has had the aristocratic composition that has been advocated by massive demographic systems. This according to entrepreneurship journals has supported factors of public education and within the symbolic efforts to enrich those systems; the organizational operations had a relative imperfection of the national cohesion. The writings of Ali, (1996) have been critical of the essentially new features affecting the overall creation of relatively new social features and in the most notable approach; the democratic concentration remained a prudent factor within which certain levels of equality were derived. In few other countries that were justified along this system, the democratic process of United States remained virtually nonexistent. Critical studies indeed argued that real formations were justifiable and subjected to real issues that were in themselves highly complex. Demography and Epidemiology Introduction Demography can be simply defined as the statistical study of human populations. Edge (2007, p.49) defines demography as a branch of science that specifically deals with different aspects of human populations including its size, density, changes, and characteristics. Mckenzie et al (2011, p.64) states ‘Epidemiology is the study of the distribution and determinants of health related states or events in specified populations, and the application of this study to control health problems.’ A. Elements which impinge upon the work of the enterprise and the national and local sources of demographic and epidemiological data 1. Effects of Environment on Enterprise Environmental changes can notably affect the functions of an enterprise. Such changes can also affect national as well as local sources of demographic and epidemiological data. As per reports, the environment has been undergoing tremendous changes for the last few years mainly due to thoughtless human activities. These changes are likely to affect the way an organisation designs its operations. 2. Impacts of Demographic Trends on Epidemiological Environment There is a strong relationship between demography and epidemiology. Both these studies focus on an overall population, rather than individuals. Hence, demographic trends and changes can have significant impacts on the epidemiological environment of health and social care. To illustrate, consider demographic determinants like birth rate, migration flow, or death rate. It is clear that a rise or fall in birth rate, migration flow, or death rate would alter the structure of a population. Since epidemiological studies increasingly focus on factors like birth, aging and death, these types of demographic trend changes would greatly influence the outcomes of epidemiological studies. 3. Sources of Demographic and Epidemiological Data Normally, local, national and international bodies provide information about demography and epidemiology. Undoubtedly, census is the most important single source of demographic data and it is generally conducted by local governmental bodies. In addition to this, other primary sources of demographic data include migration reports, surveys, estimates and various programme registrations. Surveys conducted by governmental and non-governmental bodies represent other potential source of demographic data. For instance, international bodies like World Health Organisation and UN possess extensive demographic database. UK National Publication Hub is one of the major sources of demographic data in the United Kingdom. Today numerous web-based demographic data sources are also available. Unlike demographic data, epidemiological data are provided mainly by organisations working in the healthcare sector. In the United Kingdom, Health Protection Agency is one of the major independent providers of epidemiological data. 4. Key Aspects of Social Environment Evidently, demographic and epidemiological study results may be notably influenced by various social environmental aspects including lifestyle, food habits and political status. Many scholars opine that social environment is very likely to cause demographic variations through behavioural mechanisms. Hettyey and Pearman (2002) state ‘One aspect of social environment, relative abundance to hetero-specifics, influences the intensity of reproductive interference and its demographic effects.’ B. A whole new consumer healthcare segment is emerging Today, prevalence of diseases is very high due to some notable changes in lifestyle trends. The ‘fast-food’ habit has greatly contributed to an adverse shift in epidemiological distribution of an area. Reports indicate that the number of people with diseases like diabetes, heart attack and osteoporosis is increasing day by day. For instance, studies (Hembert et al. 2012) show that changing demographics is more likely to increase the prevalence of chronic diseases. Demographic and subsequent epidemiological variations may reshape almost all practices in social life. Studies have proven that the environment can have a great influence on a person’s health and therefore environmental changes may impact an area’s epidemiological distribution also. Hence, the healthcare industry is striving to meet people’s growing healthcare needs. In order to meet this requirement, a whole new consumer healthcare segment is emerging between the mass market, supermarket-based world of consumer goods companies and scientific, pharmacy-based companies. Since the population with health risks grow, healthcare products are likely to move to the heart of the mass market. When health complications show an upward trend, the government cannot effectively manage its healthcare segments. In other words, public sector healthcare facilities may not be adequate to meet this drastically changing healthcare trend. In this situation, scientific or pharmacy based companies may not be able meet customer demands effectively even though they engage in large scale production and distribution activities. As a result, new market entrants may try to capitalise on this situation by developing new healthcare facilities or improved medicines. It is clear that customer demand is closely related to the concept of mass market. As we mentioned earlier, population with health risk factors is growing and today, a vast majority of the people (particularly 30 years and above) have a combination of two or more diseases. Hence, they need to get different treatment facilities and quality medicines at fairly low costs. The concept of mass market would assist modern people to meet their health requirements effectively as the mass marketing strategy covers the whole population for the particular industry product. Even though people today are more concerned about their health, they are not ready to spend much time on health maintenance due to their hectic schedules. Hence, modern people seek ways to improve their health status by spending less time and money. Under such circumstance, concepts like supermarkets or mass markets would better serve customer demand in accordance with customer expectations. This type of market settings takes advantages of various demographic and epidemiological data sources, because they assist supermarket facilities to easily identify current healthcare needs better. Current trends indicate that the emerging mass market and supermarket cultures in healthcare industry are going to dominate the scientific or pharmacy based healthcare culture. In short, healthcare industry is most likely to move toward a mass market culture in the near future. Conclusion: From the above discussion and analysis, it can be concluded that the healthcare sector can be improved with a growth and improvement in the technology. It has been observed that improvement in healthcare sector is highly needed to provide the patients with proper care in different diseases. It was concluded that due to change in lifestyles, people are becoming increasingly prone to different diseases and health issues. Similarly, it is equally important to establish and formulate proper management system within a facility to organize the system and to remain efficient and effective in providing excellent healthcare facilities to the patients. References Department of Health (2009). Decision Support Tool for NHS Continuing Healthcare. Document [Online] Available at: http://www.oxfordshirepct.nhs.uk/your-health/documents/DSTjuly09.pdf [Accessed May 31, 2012]. Edge, D. S. (2007). ‘Epidemiology, Demography and Community Health’, in A. R. Vollman, E. T. Anderson and J. McFarlane (eds) Canadian Community As Partner: Theory & Multidisciplinary Practice, p. 49. London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Hettyey, A and P. B. Pearman (2002) ‘Social Environment and Reproductive Interference Affect Reproductive Success in the Frog Rana Latastei’, Oxford Journals: Behavioral Ecology 14 (2): 249-300. Hembert, E., Anscombe, J. and Thomas, M. (2012). ‘Winning the battle for consumer healthcare’, AT Kearney. Available at [Accessed 30 May 2012] McKenzie, J. F., Pinger, R. R and J. E. Kotecki (2011) An Introduction to Community Health. USA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers. Marks, L. & Hunter, D. J. (2011). Social Enterprises and the NHS: Changing patterns of Ownership and Accountability. Introduction. [Online] Available at: http://www.unison.org.uk/file/B5560.pdf [Accessed May 31, 2012]. Tapp, C. (2012). Leadership & Management in the Health & Social Care Sector. Park Royal College. [Online] Available at: http://www.parkroyalcollege.org/uploads/770746295L7%20PGDIP%20HCM%20HANDBOOK.pdf [Accessed May 31, 2012]. Ali, A. (1996). Organizational development in the Arab world. Journal of Management Development, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 4-21 Aranda, D. and Fernandez, L. (2002). Determinants of innovation through a knowledge-based theory lens.Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 102 No. 5, pp. 289-96 Connelly, C. and Kelloway, E., (2003).Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 294-301 Field, A., (2000).Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows. SAGE Publications, London. Ford, D. (2001). Trust and knowledge management: the seeds of success. Queen’s KBE Center for Knowledge-Based Enterprises, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada, available at: http://business.queensu.ca/knowledge/workingpapers/working/working_01-08.pdf (accessed 26 August 2004). Read More