Willard Mitt Romney, as the Republican Party’s candidate for president to the United States in 2012, said that there are 47% of the people who would vote for President Obama no matter what. Romney argues that we should cut the welfare spending because these people need to take…
Download file to see previous pages...
The underlying reason for this has to do with my understanding that the vast majority of this 47% of individuals that Romney indicated were dependent and “lazy” would ultimately love to have an opportunity to provide for themselves; however, they simply do not have the ability to do so. In such a way, the following analysis will be concentric upon describing this problem from a more nuanced perspective and analyzing this broad and differentiated group in terms of the responsibilities that citizens have towards their fellow citizens and the overall impact of providing services to those that are incapable of providing for themselves. Further, to understand the problem, it is necessary to know who comprises this 47%.
According to Mitt Romney, the 47% represents those individuals within the United States that are not required to pay federal income taxes. The majority of these are the low-income households; most of which earn less than $ 30,000 a year. Of these, many are willing to work hard and earn a living; however, they cannot find full time employment as a result of the abysmal state of the economy. As such, they are trapped in minimum wage jobs; oftentimes working as part time employees. Not considering income taxes, these individuals can barely feed the families and provide for the basic necessities of life. As can be seen, expecting these very individuals to pay income tax would dis-incentivize engaging with the workforce and created a situation in which these very individuals would be worse off working several part-time jobs then they would be drawing unemployment checks and other forms of government welfare assistance. As can immediately be seen, simply categorizing these individuals as “lazy” is a gross exaggeration and misunderstanding of the labor force and how it works. The fact of the matter is that these individuals are not lazy and have instead chosen to work
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Are We Feeding the Poor People Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1651475-are-we-feeding-the-poor-people
(Are We Feeding the Poor People Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Are We Feeding the Poor People Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1651475-are-we-feeding-the-poor-people.
There are two different points of view regarding privatization of water. Some experts believe that privatization is good to solve environmental problems whereas some experts are totally against this step and are in favor of anti-privatization movement. My stand regarding the issue is that the role of corporations and businesses in managing environmental resources is very favorable because it solves water shortage problems for the poor people.
This is because poverty carries on from generation to generation and since poor people are not able to easily afford education, their children grow up with no knowledge of how to make their lives better and thus have to carry on the legacy that their parents have provided them with, which they further provide to their children, subsequently.
With so many varying opinions, theories and individual experiences on the subject, how do you make an educated choice about which is best for both you and your baby? Perhaps the best way to get started is to actually describe the theories and professional advice available on both methods, in order to make an informed decision.
On the other, there are individuals who believe that poverty can be alleviated and to help out the poor is one of the moral responsibilities of the society. This paper explores these sides and aims to make the reader see our own moral and social obligation when it comes to dealing with poverty.
The origin of man still remains a phenomenon as scientists and religious concepts seem to differ in belief and explanations. The two conflicting parties disagree in almost every aspect thus posing the question that cannot be explained without choosing a side to believe.
As such, due to the lack of an open trade policy, Estonia was one among several erstwhile nations to suffer from economic downturn upon the collapse of the Soviet machinery. However, the turn of the new century has helped the country turn a new leaf and has seen it emerge
For instance, Rolston is just being realistic about the situation by agreeing the fact that it is ideal to eliminate poverty, but humans prefer other values by addressing first their needs.Rolston illustrates this point by analyzing the desires of every person which he believes to be self-centered.
Perhaps one of the most notable malnourishment diseases that affect poor people is beri beri. Beri beri is an inflammatory disease that causes degenerative changes on the body’s nervous system, heart and