Download file to see previous pages...
isting of the wealthy communities like the Netherlands and the England were the kind of nation, which lived a life compared to be equivalent to that of the Stone Age. In contrary the vast swath of humanity in South and East Asia, especially in Japan and China, eked out living conditions which were comparably significantly poorer than the living conditions of the cavemen (p. 17).
The parameters of gauging the quality of life could not withstand the test of time and substantially no improvements were observable from any dimension: when the life expectancy was not higher than that of the hunters and gatherers in1800, just merely 30-35 years of age. Stature-the measure of how children are exposed to diseases and the quality of diet was gauged to be higher in the Stone Age than as compared to the 1800. In fact, the poor of 18th C, the kind of individuals who lived by providing unskilled labor alone, would be in a better off situation when transferred to the hunter-gatherer band.
Even after the robust Industrial revolution prosperity has not been felt by every society. Material consumption in certain nations, especially in the Sub-Saharan Africa, is currently well below the Preindustrial era (Clark 237). It is believed that countries like Tanzania and Malawi would have been better off materially if the y could have continued with their preindustrial state and had no contact with the world industrialization process.
The different nations have of late embraced the spirit of capitalism-the winner gets it all art, and therefore material well-being and social welfare of individuals are not components of the gauging parameters. Rapid growth in population across different nations has resulted to over dependency and exhaustion of the available resources, thus material improvement in quality of life. Unless justified from another perspective growth has not proved to be good to the poor, or it could be its taking long to prove substantial to the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Is growth good for the poor Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1645341-is-growth-good-for-the-poor
(Is Growth Good for the Poor Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
“Is Growth Good for the Poor Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1645341-is-growth-good-for-the-poor.
According to the research where there is more rapidly growth, there is a bigger possibility to achieve more equal opportunity as well as a wider allotment of the benefits that accrues from the growth. Through continues economic growth a country is capable of addressing the issue of environmental degradation more effectively as the income obtained from the growth may be used to improve on the environmental amenities.
Based on this research the middle class people fight irately against any supplementary taxation or job cuts. The poor people are hit even worse. Therefore, Reich advocates more sensible economic policies to be implemented. An analytical evaluation of this text would suggest that Reich has expressed very practical viewpoints in relation to the present economic slowdown.
The article “Why Growth is Good” has put forward some of his arguments on why steady growth should be the aim of the time. So the article of the author is close to reality and only a few modifications will make the article more compact. The author is correct from his point of view and the contradictions in some arguments arise only when the other viewpoints is taken into consideration.
They essentially believe in free market philosophy to remove the poverty. Their central belief is that economic growth will benefit all in equal measure. The authors give example of India and China who after globalization and liberalization have been able to decrease their poverty rates.
And it does. The higher the Government Spending, the more availability of public goods in the country, proving to be beneficial for the citizens of the country. Public spending is a key factor in the state’s economic growth and development. It is very essential for financing infrastructure electricity, including roads and water but this public spending should be undertaken, after evaluating all the options so that it proves to be advantageous to the growth of the economy.
According to the paper the developed world is characterized by remarkable infrastructure, the best educational systems, and good health care systems. On the contrary, there are poor nations with people living on less than a dollar a day, deplorable health care systems, malnutrition and lack of clean water. The sharp contrast could be argued to have been caused by exploitation of the poor by the rich countries.
When the government insists on raising taxes people tend to shy away from investment due to taxes imposed on them. A sovereign nation is wise to note that money is a matter brought by the people earning it. Moreover, it is reason enough to cut taxes in order to realize that prosperity does not just come about but has to be created.
In addition, the term "Xeroxing" is quickly becoming synonymous with "copying." The company made its presence felt in 1959 with the introduction of the first one-piece, plain paper photocopier using the process of xerography (electro photography), the Xerox 914.
As such, due to the lack of an open trade policy, Estonia was one among several erstwhile nations to suffer from economic downturn upon the collapse of the Soviet machinery. However, the turn of the new century has helped the country turn a new leaf and has seen it emerge
The Development Assistance Committee which among other things serves to alleviate poverty, issued guidelines to tackle poverty in the globe in 2001 (Ravallion 2003). The guidelines show that poverty has many interlinked dimensions and causes including: human,
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Is growth good for the poor for FREE!