Running Head: Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution Alternative Dispute Resolution Introduction Without any doubts, conflicts, claims, and disagreements are common in our societies and communities…
Download file to see previous pages...
The same is known as alternative dispute resolution1. According to the available literature on alterative dispute resolution, there are four categories of ADR, which include arbitration, negotiation, mediation and collaborative law. There are experts who tend to cite conciliation as the fifth category. Other than negotiation, all other ADR categories include the person of a outside, unbiased and external person, which acts as the third party to facilitate the process and ensure that the parties reach a settlement. There are thousands of cases of divorces, commercial disputes, family disputes, professional liability cases, insurance issues, personal injury situations and others, where ADR has proven to be more effective than the traditional court processes and the first choice of parties to resolve their disputes2. Nevertheless, there are some pros and cons of ADR. This paper, therefore, is an attempt to explore the various advantages and disadvantages associated with alternative dispute resolution. Discussion Advantages of ADR First, ADR offers the advantage of being cheap and quick. On the other hand, formal court processes may take years and cost people a fortune. In fact, in many developing countries with huge populations such as India, Pakistan and others, it takes more than 20-30 years for a person to get a date for his or her case hearing. During the 1990s, a woman who was raped filled a petition in the court for justice. However, when her date for hearing arrived, it has been more than 5 years since her death3. Furthermore, many poor and lower class people forget about their issues and claims in various countries considering the legal fees, bribes and other money which they would have to pay for getting justice. ADR, on the other hand, allows people to get quick and inexpensive justice. Many arbitration boards would take less than a few weeks before they could finalize their decisions45. Second, people prefer to keep their internal matters public; however, when they refer to courts for justice, everything becomes public. The bigger the case, the information about both the parties would leak into the public. However, in case of ADR, the same does not happen. Both parties cannot only ensure confidentiality during the investigations and hearings but if they want then the decision and results may also be kept only to people inside the rooms6. Third, despite the fact that the judges and jury have great deal of knowledge about the happenings in the society, nevertheless, they are not the experts of certain fields. Therefore, whenever technical matters are brought up in front of the jury, huge investments in terms of time and money have to be done in order to educate the jury and even then, there is lesser chance that the jury would give a verdict after fully understanding the technical matters7. Fourth, courts have a limited number of options. They are books of law, processes, specific rules and outcomes, which one can predict. In short, there are certain paths and processes, which the jury cannot avoid while making a decision. However, in ADR, the jury has the power to be more creative and give decisions in light of domestic laws, international laws, foreign laws or even religious laws8. Fifth,
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Alternative Dispute Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1427317-discuss-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of
(Discuss the Advantages and Disadvantages of Alternative Dispute Essay)
“Discuss the Advantages and Disadvantages of Alternative Dispute Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1427317-discuss-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of.
This essay discusses that business law is the law that is appropriate to business units like partnerships and corporations. For sometimes, QuizLaw has concentrated on the laws associated to the locations and creations like a business. However, most business cases involve disputes brought about by business rivalry, competition or misunderstandings.
In spite of being dissimilar, the connected between the two seems extricable such that they appear to be two sides of a coin. All laws, which based on assessment of bias, use these two notions together. The laws that do not employ the two terms are the English Arbitration Act and the International Chamber of Commerce.
However, this evolved in steps – first, the arbitration clause began to be considered as separate from the underlying contract; then, even though it was separate, it was held that it did not survive the end of the contract; then it was held that it would survive the end of a contract, and would survive if a contract was voidable, but no if a contract was void.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a general term used to describe different methods employed to resolve arising disputes instead of filling for litigation.1 The fundamental principle of ADR is that disagreeing parties should always try to avoid litigation when possible.ADR when applied to internal business, aims to resolve disputed expeditiously and fairly by limiting the process within the business managers together with their legal advisers and avoiding litigating lawyers, judges as well as courts.
The numbers of cases filed in the courts have always been increasing like in any other nation, and the pressure arising from resolving these conflicts requires integrated effort and procedures to deliver justice appropriately. ADR not only touches on the legal education and the practitioners, but affects the society and parties seeking to resolve their differences.
Due to the increasing use of the Internet worldwide, the number of disputes arising from the Internet commerce is forever on the rise. Numerous websites have been established in order to attempt at resolving or at least partially solving this dilemma; as well as to facilitate the resolution of disputes that occurs offline.
It is a less formal and often more consensual way to resolve the dispute than is done in the courts. ADR is not come into the government judicial process. In some last years Alternative dispute resolution has obtained extensive popularity among both the general public and the legal profession.
In its paragraph 6, the verdict makes observation of the fact that many believe that the advantages of mediation or of ADR have not yet been sufficiently demonstrated.1
Although not exactly the same, ADR and mediation are interchangeably understood as synonymous.
sitional bargaining parties are trying to end a dispute by law, facilitation resolution through various forms of a mediation to settle disputes, seeking resolution through arbitration and various other forms of decision-making, binding or not.
There so, one of the biggest
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Alternative Dispute Resolution for FREE!