Download file to see previous pages...
The purpose was to create a central office for waging the war on drugs. Upon its establishment, the DEA was comprised of 1,470 Special Agents with a US$75 million budget. The DEA currently has 5,200 Special Agents with an operating budget of US$2.6 billion.3 Both sides of the argument have merits. In other words it is equally arguable that the War on Drugs is ineffective and that the War on Drugs is effective. Therefore the best that can be deduced is that it is virtually impossible to measure the effectiveness of the War on Drugs. To start with, it is difficult to devise a benchmark for measuring the War on Drugs. For instance, is the War on Drugs measured by reference to the expenditure and the prevalence of drug use and exploitation? Or is it fair to measure the effectiveness of the War on Drugs by identifying the percentage of non-users? Each of these methods of measurements raise significant questions relative to their validity. For instance, if the expenditure were less would the problems of drug use be greater? If there was no War on Drugs would the percentage of users be greater?
Regardless, the US government and a majority of governments are determined to control drug use and production. Meanwhile, drug users and drug producers are just as determined to continue producing and using drugs. In measuring the effectiveness of the War on Drugs both of these factors are significant. The main question is whether or not drug users and producers’ determination to use controlled substances is matched by governments’ determination to control the use and production of illicit drugs....
n question is whether or not drug users and producers’ determination to use controlled substances is matched by governments’ determination to control the use and production of illicit drugs. In this regard, the US drug policy and its War on Drugs’ agenda is approached from a supply side initiative. In other words, the US government expresses its determination to control drug use and production by primarily focusing on interdicting drugs and thereby preventing its entry into the US. Given the extent of the drug problem in the US this interdiction oriented scheme is for the most part ineffective. Boyum and Reuter report that: Drugs are as accessible as ever as inflation-adjusted prices for cocaine and heroin have fallen by more than half.4 In other words, despite its best and most expensive efforts to prevent illicit drugs entering the US, these drugs continue to be available on the streets of the US. In fact Stokes reports that despite the War on Drugs, increasingly, the street price of heroin and cocaine in the US has fallen and yet at the same time has improved in its quality and content.5 It would therefore appear that the supply side approach to the War on Drugs expresses a determination to cut off the supply of drugs to the US and by doing so curtail production and use. However, this determination is not matched by the determination to produce and use illicit drugs since all indications are that drugs are not only continuing to enter the US, but they are continuing to be used excessively. What these outcomes reveal is that the primary technique of taking a supply side approach to the War on Drugs is ineffective. The US government must therefore look at alternative methods for fighting the War on Drugs and expressing its determination to control illicit drug
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Effectiveness of the War on Drugs Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1424897-effectiveness-of-the-war-on-drugs
(Effectiveness of the War on Drugs Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Effectiveness of the War on Drugs Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1424897-effectiveness-of-the-war-on-drugs.
Time has changed now; radiotherapy, chemotherapy, operation in certain cases and medicine are now leading a hard battle against this disease (ITIK', Uymaz, Stephen, and BANKS, 715). Before moving into details regarding the efficiency of drugs combating cancer, it would be better if a brief and clear overview of the disease can be obtained. In most simple terms cancer is an uncontrolled growth of cells that might happen at any place of the body.
The global war on drugs is an issue that has taken the entire continent by storm. The developed countries are having a rough time as their economies are slowly brought to their knees because of this trade.
First body paragraph highlights controversial debate over the use of drugs by the government at the same time when government fights against it. Second body paragraph includes a brief view of the policies and laws proposed and implement by the government of the USA in the war against drugs. Third paragraph discusses claims and arguments of the individuals who are against illegalization of drugs. Conclusion includes an outcome of the argumentative discussion over legal and illegal use of alcohol and other drugs by the government of the US.
It analyzes how many professionals believe that incarcerating drug offenders actually reduces crime, but what they do not know is the fact that according to the time series analysis of four crime rates in the United States, this view is not supported.
This involves execution of necessary laws and regulations to prevent crimes from taking place particularly within a country including the national borders. Drug and human trafficking are among some of the most serious crimes in the country (Stark 2011, pg.
Efficiently confronting the drug problem involves both preventing the issue from arising through drug eradication and military involvement, as well as by providing remedial solution to the problem through different methods of treatment. A study on drug trade shows the role played by colonization in the growth of international opium and cocaine trades and the essay analyzes this. Furthermore, an analysis of the ways in which conflict and wars play an important role in establishing a drug market have also been discussed.
One might posit that the reason for such a differential has to do with the overall level of harm differential that exists between these drugs; however, when one considers the fact that alcohol is more addictive and destructive than any illegal street drug with the exception of heroin and cocaine, the level of differential between these, from a quality of health standpoint, is negligible.
Drugs are shown to affect people of all ages, particularly young people in their productive years leading to grave health problems. So, as drugs affect citizens’ physical health, moral behavior, and so on and thereby lead to a number of social problems, the government have been coming up with measures to control this drug menace.
Prohibition of the drugs is a major source of crime because it inflates the prices and invites new criminals into the illegal trade and fosters adulteration. Moreover, prohibition ties up law enforcement officers, who would be available to pursue other serious crimes, to drug related cases.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Effectiveness of the War on Drugs for FREE!