The Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood - Annotated Bibliography Example

In addition to her credibility as a Ph.D. in linguistics, Dancygier has published peer-reviewed articles examining narrative complexity in a variety of works. The article is current. Dancygier published her article seven years after Atwood’s novel was published. This amount of time was sufficient for critical opinion to form. At first, this source seemed to offer some insight into the narrative complexity of the novel. However, the paper is a book review and only contains a cursory overview of narrative complexity.

The source is not relevant to the topic and contains little information. Thus, the quality of evidence suffers because the author does not address her topic with significant depth. Rebecca Davies is credible in that she publishes articles that analyze fiction. But, she publishes almost entirely for the journal, Lancet. Davies published her review within a year of the publication of the novel. This amount of time is insufficient for critical analysis and discussion to have occurred. This source is relevant to the topic of narrative complexity in The Blind Assassin.

Though the article addresses two different novels, Harold discusses how the reader engages with the narrative of The Blind Assassin by providing quality evidence of how the reader’s point of view affects his reading. James Harold is credible as he is a professor of philosophy at Mount Holyoake College and publishes articles in a wide variety of peer-reviewed journals. Harold published the article within five years of the novel’s publication. The article is current. It is neither too old as to be out-of-date or too close to the novel’s publication as to be premature in its conclusions.

Ingersoll’s paper is relevant to the narrative complexity of the novel because it addresses how Atwood brings all her various narrative threads together for the conclusion of the book. Ingersoll presents quality evidence that the novel provides a