The paper compares Dr. Faustus and The Shoemaker's Holiday. These are two Elizabethan dramas with very different tones, morals and messages. Dr. Faustus was the classical story of the man who sold his soul to the devil in exchange for knowledge and power. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Download file to see previous pages
The most obvious use of disguise in Dr. Faustus is the fact that Mephastophilis (Meph.) himself must disguise himself because his true visage is too ugly. Although Marlowe does not go into detail as to how Meph. looked when he first appeared to Faustus, it was obvious that the demon looked like the traditional depiction of a demo. Faustus commands Meph. to instantly change his shape - “I charge thee to return and change thy shape. Thou art too ugly to attend on me; Go, and return an old Franciscan friar: That holy shape becomes a devil best.” This is a metaphor for all that comes after. Meph. is evil, and, as such, his appearance was that of evil, in that he was ugly. Evil is ugly. However, the deal that was struck was made to seem fairly benign, like a business transaction. That Faustus asked Meph. to take the form of a Franciscan Friar is emblematic not only of the way that evil is sanitized throughout the book, but also the fact that evil is only thinly disguised. Faustus did not ask Meph. to take the form of beauty, such as a beautiful woman or man, but, rather, a Franciscan friar who is old. If Meph. was asked to take the form of a beautiful woman or man, then it could be said that evil was more elaborately disguised, as the ugly would have been transformed into its opposite, beauty. This helps him in that he can pretend that what is happening is not really dark magic, but, rather, the work of God. Indeed, God becomes part of the theme through the rest of the play, as Faustus alternately attempts to pray to God, yet is rebuked by Meph. so that he stops. Meph. taking the image of the holy man is one way to pretend that the bargain was not really struck, and that the bargain was not all that evil in the first place. In other words, Faustus needed to trick himself into taking the bargain, and the best way to do that was not to look at evil in the way that evil looks, but, rather, to sanitize it. This was the function of the original disguise of Meph. That Meph. transformed into a benign figure also hearkens back to
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Dr. Faustus and The Shoemaker's Holiday Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/literature/1441476-dr-faustus-and-the-shoemakers-holiday
(Dr. Faustus and The Shoemaker'S Holiday Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4250 Words)
“Dr. Faustus and The Shoemaker'S Holiday Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/literature/1441476-dr-faustus-and-the-shoemakers-holiday.
Introduction: Cancer can be described as an uncontrolled multiplication of cells in a given organ or tissue. Normal cells follow a general pattern of division, which is termed as mitosis or meiosis. Due to environmental, chemical, or genetic factors, these cells begin to behave in an abnormal manner by repeated division.
Subsequently regardless of the difference in the eras of Euripides and Marlow it is observed that both playwrights in their respective plays “Bacchae'” and “Dr. Faustus” focus on the power dynamics and the abuse of power between human beings and the super powers like God and the Devil.
Faustus and Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray respectively. The essay looks at how these characters function as an indictment of their respective ages, since both are damned for being in one sense the supreme products of that age, as well as authorial intention in the creation of these characters.
According to this article in “The Importance of Being Earnest”, more than one man is found playing at being someone else. “Dr. Faustus” on the other hand, deals with deception in an entirely different light, allowing the main character to carry off a series of mean tricks only to seal his own doom in the end. In both plays, deception may be the main theme, but each shows deception is not all it’s cracked up to be in their own unique way.
The author states that King Lear chronicles the story of a king in advanced age who chooses to divide his kingdom among his three daughters based upon how well each one expresses her love for him in speech. When his youngest and favorite daughter refuses to participate because she feels such practice would cheapen her feelings for him.
A study of the dialogue and beliefs of Doctor Faustus points to Doctor Faustus as a man who had religious belief.
During the play, Faustus displays some atheistic attitudes through his speech when he asserts that religion is false and that
Death comes to the world from the disobedience of Adam and Eve, which consisted of eating of the fruit from the tree of knowledge (Milton):
In Shakespeare, meanwhile, death is time, the ravages of time, the ageing process, time destroying all that is beautiful in oneself
The author states that Faustus through the play sells his soul and strikes a deal with Lucifer to offer him protection in every aspect of his earthly life as well as his family. This deal is later sealed in the blood of through blood and the devil agrees to award him protection for about twenty-four year’s protection on earth as his loyal servant.