StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Nobody downloaded yet

An Argument for the Conviction and Acquittal of the West Memphis Three - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
This paper "An Argument for the Conviction and Acquittal of the West Memphis Three" focuses on the fact that the strength of the arguments for the conviction of Jessie Misskelley, Damien Echols and Jason Baldwin somehow depended mostly on Jessie’s statement before he was pronounced guilty…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.4% of users find it useful
An Argument for the Conviction and Acquittal of the West Memphis Three
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "An Argument for the Conviction and Acquittal of the West Memphis Three"

Download file to see previous pages Based on the recorded statement of Jessie Misskelley for the police, he saw Damien Echols hit Christopher Byers, and Jason Baldwin hit Stevie Branch, and that he was the one who captured Michael Moore while the latter was running ((Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills 41:43). The details of the interrogation are proof that the interrogation and Misskelley’s answers to the questions could not have been merely set up by the police beforehand. Besides, the police would not have been that lazy as to set up three young men just to have the case closed early. The aforementioned statement of Misskelley was hardly nullified by any of the defence lawyers.

Another strong evidence against the West Memphis Three, particularly against Jessie Misskelley is that he was able to identify the boys in the pictures shown by the police. Although he made a mistake with the identification of Christopher Byers, mistaking him for Michael Moore, still he was able to identify them by face. The mere fact that he could identify the victims is actually a strong proof that he had contact with them prior to the trial. One more problem to this is that Jessie did not even tell any of his lawyers or his family that he was forced by the police to make such a confession. It was merely the lawyers who said so.

Arguments of the defense in favor of Jessie included his mental handicap (34:35). Nevertheless, based on the deputy’s statement, Jessie was not tortured, maligned or harmed in any way prior or during the confession (47:31). The deputy could not have been lying under oath, based on the tone of his voice, and based on the fact that Jessie did not vehemently or even secretly said that he was indeed harmed. Besides, Jessie’s reactions in court, like bowing his head, are that of a guilty man. Moreover, he has not in any way told his lawyers how innocent he was or how untrue his confession was.

Another argument directed against Jessie is his sexual nature (36:20). As he was talking to his girlfriend on the phone, he recalls all the times that he has had sex with her.  ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(An Argument for the Conviction and Acquittal of the West Memphis Three Assignment, n.d.)
An Argument for the Conviction and Acquittal of the West Memphis Three Assignment. https://studentshare.org/law/1800665-you-can-choose-the-title
(An Argument for the Conviction and Acquittal of the West Memphis Three Assignment)
An Argument for the Conviction and Acquittal of the West Memphis Three Assignment. https://studentshare.org/law/1800665-you-can-choose-the-title.
“An Argument for the Conviction and Acquittal of the West Memphis Three Assignment”. https://studentshare.org/law/1800665-you-can-choose-the-title.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF An Argument for the Conviction and Acquittal of the West Memphis Three

Argument

...?Extra Credit Introduction Marketing strategies directed at by credit card companies have borne significant adverse impacts on the lives of students. Consequently, colleges and the other educational institutions should be strongly against credit card companies marketing their products to students who, in turn, end up bearing the cost of their ill-informed financial decisions. The move to call for a ban on credit cards for students is a welcome to me concerning cautioning them about the dangers involved. This is in light of recent events where students are getting themselves in debt at a significantly young age, while they cannot make enough to pay for the said credit cards. Banning universities from showing, or rather, selling... Credit...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Argument

...? Ethical Perspective on Workplace Privacy Ethical Perspective on Workplace Privacy Introduction The growing number of organizationsis deploying online surveillance systems to monitor their employees while they are working in the office. The ethical ramifications of this practice are an active cause of heated debate among management scholars. This paper will attempt to provide a logically sound argument based on various ethical, legal and organizational theories, which will negate the delusion of employee rights to privacy while performing their jobs. Along with these, some managerial implications will also be discussed. This paper begins with the basic argument that organizations are forced to deploy surveillance mechanisms...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Argument

... is one way of opening the minds of those who are conservative to understand the nature of cohabitation. It provides us information on the quality traits that matches future partner which could make marriage more stable. Reference Bruderl, J., et al. Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Stability in West Germany. PDF. P 1. Budinski, R., & Trovato, F., The Effect of Premarital Cohabitation on Marital Stability over the Duration of Marriage. Canadian Studies in Population. 2005, pp. 72.... Premarital Cohabitation: Its Positive Effects Living together before marriage or premarital cohabitation, for many couples, is considered not a good plan. However, not everyone agrees that couples who practice cohabitation is a bad idea. Many couples feel that ...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Criminal Justice on the Memphis 3 boys

... the accused. If there exists just an iota of reasonable doubt that the accused is innocent means that the court has the legal obligation to declare an acquittal and free the accused. As William Blackstone succinctly puts it, “It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.” 4) Provide specific details regarding what probable cause the police uncovered which allowed them to arrest the suspect. The finding of probable cause against Jessie Misskelley was anchored on the extrajudicial confession he made in the presence of Det. Bryn Ridge and Insp. Gary Gitchell of the West Memphis Police Department. The information that Misskelley provided in his testimony, that Damien Echols killed the boys, were later corroborated...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Convection, Conduction and Radiation

...? HEAT TRANSFERS: CONVECTION, CONDUCTION, AND RADIATION Heat Transfers: Convection, Conduction and Radiation A Pertinent Study Heat Transfer in theContext of Three Different Ways Your Name Your School’s Name HEAT TRANSFERS: CONVECTION, CONDUCTION, AND RADIATION 2 Abstract Heat is defined as the transmission of heat or thermal energy over a clear-cut border all over a thermodynamic system. Heat is everywhere. We always feel them; however, because of unawareness, we do not notice them. Ideally, heat is the transfer of energy from one system to another. A system is a term in Physics which means an “object”. Since heat is something that a system does not necessarily have, hence, it is the transfer of energy from one body to another. The energy...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

An Argument for the Conviction of the West Memphis Three

... An Argument for the Conviction of the West Memphis Three The strength of the arguments for the conviction of Jessie Misskelley, Damien Echols and Jason Baldwin somehow depended mostly on Jessie’s statement before he was pronounced guilty. There were other pieces of evidence but they stood out either because there was nothing to counter them or that they were indeed logical. The main reason why the West Memphis Three should be convicted is that Jessie Misskelley pointed out in his detailed statement that the three of them were the ones who brutally tortured and murdered the three young boys. Based on the recorded statement of Jessie Misskelley for the police, he saw Damien Echols hit Christopher Byers, and Jason Baldwin hit Stevie Branch...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

The Case of the West Memphis 3

... with the case, would serve to leave questions in regards to the methods taken by the investigators. Such questions as to how they were able to feel confident in theory that they would have put together from those assumptions and have that become the case they would ultimately be able to form. On the afternoon of 6 May 1993, West Memphis was rocked by the news of the discovery of the mutilated bodies of three eight year old boys. Rumors regarding the nature of the murders spread like wildfire through the town. It was soon well known that the boys had been cut with a knife, raped and at least one of the boy's genitals had been cut, many of these rumors were based on inaccurate police assumptions. By 12:00 p.m. the next day...
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study

Post-conviction remedies

... How post-conviction remedies differ from direct appeals In relation to the crime and the judgment made, individuals decide on the most suitable method to appeal for their cases. Normally, there are two methods which are commonly used: post conviction remedies and direct appeals filed by a defendant after his conviction in a trial court. Direct appeals are requests to an appellate court for it to review and change the decision of a lower court. The defendant may dispute the conviction itself or appeal the trial courts sentencing judgment without actually challenging the fundamental conviction. Some of the most common post conviction appeals include: appeal to State appellate Court which contends that trial judge made some legal error...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Memphis Design

... on the individual designs, materials and the need to develop new approaches. Most of the products and materials at the time did not have a reflection of the period and a change was required to enhance the development of new designs. 5) What are your two or three favorite Memphis products? Please explain why you like them. Memphis has a number of products that are unique and exhibit a number of unique features. The furniture is one of the most favorite products that Memphis produces. The furniture is a favorite because they are manufactured using unique designs that make them stand out from the rest of the materials (Radice 141-145). Consequently, the colors used in chairs give a unique impression to the products. Another favorite product...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Criminal Justice Act in 2003

... by the Criminal Justice Act of 2003 to include a more inclusionary perspective with regard to admissibility of evidence of the person’s bad character, thereby converting the exception into a general rule. Thus according to this new inclusionary rule, both – the person’s previous records related to his / her convictions and / or acquittals could be presented and used in court as admissible evidence of their bad character. The definition of bad character also included offenders below the age of fourteen, and all offences committed below such an age, were also permissible as evidence of his/her bad character (Sec. 108, OPSI, 2010). This rule was hence subject to critical review. According to the Joint Committee on Human Rights, admissibility...
14 Pages(3500 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic An Argument for the Conviction and Acquittal of the West Memphis Three for FREE!

Contact Us