Interconnectedness & Complexity - Coursework Example

Interconnectedness and Complexity Interconnectedness concept is the ability of things to be enjoined or related in one way or another. In urban planning, interconnectedness applies to the connection between highways and how it affects the plan if done differently. Complexity is the factors of modeling and the application of complex systems put together as managed by the government. According to Levy (2013), the variables used to produce interconnectedness and complexity concepts normally determine the traffic flow experienced in an area.

This implies that the direction or variable used in an urban plan influences the outcome experienced by the residents. Woodrow Wilson (1887) meant that the consideration of politics and administration as separate elements they serve different roles. For instance, politics deals with the laws governing the planning of an area while administration is the execution and maintenance of the plans (Rosenbloom, 2015). Despite the two should be separated, they still interact with the urban planning practices because of the laws and administration.

In reality, politics control urban planning to promote the interests of the parties and this should not be used in the administration of the urban centers. The concepts of interconnectedness and complexity compare with the theory posited by Woodrow claiming that the administration is separate from politics through the principles involved when executing the concepts (Rosenbloom, 2015). This implies that the two concepts are separate but must be incorporated to produce the desired outcomes. This is because of the usefulness of the separate variables used to determine the traffic flow and enhance time saving.

Woodrow claims that the two should be separated to influence distinctiveness and inclusivity (Levy, 2013).ReferencesLevy, J.M. (2013). Contemporary urban planning (10th ed.). Upper Saddler River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall Press.Rosenbloom, D. (2015). “The Politics-Administration Dichotomy in U.S. Historical Context.” Public Administration Review, 71(1), 57-60.