Law Questions - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Does Article 2 of the UCC apply to the contracts between Grocery, Inc. and its vendors? Do common law contracts apply? Explain your answer in detail. Your answer should compare and contrast common law contracts and UCC Article 2 contracts.
Article 2 of the UCC applies to…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.4% of users find it useful
Law Questions
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Law Questions"

GROCERY, INC. SIMULATIONS Grocery, Inc. is a retail grocery store chain. It has written contracts with many different vendors Does Article 2 of the UCC apply to the contracts between Grocery, Inc. and its vendors? Do common law contracts apply? Explain your answer in detail. Your answer should compare and contrast common law contracts and UCC Article 2 contracts.
Article 2 of the UCC applies to the contract because of article’s scope that governs sale of goods in which the grocery stores deal. Common law also applies to the contract because of its scope that includes law of contracts (Cross and Miller, 2011).
2. Grocery Inc. has contracted with Reliable Construction to renovate a store. Reliable has accepted too many contracts and must sub-contract the Grocery Inc. renovation to Casual Handyman. Grocery Inc. was not aware of the sub-contract. When Grocery saw the poor work that was being done and that Casual, not Reliable, was doing the work, Grocery applied for a court order to stop Casual from doing any more work (injunction) and then sued Reliable for breach of contract, seeking specific performance of their contract. Reliable argued that it has a right to sub-contract the work or, in the alternative, to walk away from the contracts obligations because of commercial impracticability. Who wins? Explain your answer.
Grocery wins the case because the contract involves personal skills by Reliable or its employees. In addition, no natural phenomenon has occurred after the contract to warrant impractability and this means that Reliable has no defense (Cross and Miller, 2011).
3. Jeff is 17 years old and works in the produce department. He made a down payment on a car that he purchased from Steve at a used car lot. Steve assumed that Jeff was over 18 years old and did not ask for proof of age. Six months after the purchase, Jeff lost his job and could no longer make the $200/month payments. Jeff returned the car to Steve and said he wanted to cancel the contract and that he wanted his money back. What are the possible outcomes? Explain your answers.
Steve is likely to accept the car and refund the money. This is because no valid contract existed and this further means that there was no consideration for the payment. Steve therefore owes Jeff the money (Cross and Miller, 2011).
4. Grocery Inc. has a written contract with Cereal Inc. to purchase 20 cases of cereal each month at $22/case. The contract does not state the types of cereal or how the 20 cases will be divided among Grocerys stores. After a flood, Cereal suffers extensive water damage to its warehouse and the contents therein. With the exception of Soggy Flakes, Cereal Inc. does not have enough undamaged product to comply with the Grocery contract. Twelve days before the delivery, Grocery had faxed Cereal requesting 15 cases of a variety of product to be delivered to five specific stores and the remaining 5 cases be delivered to Grocerys warehouse. On the day the delivery from Cereal was due, Grocery receives 10 cases of Soggy Flakes at five of Grocerys stores, but not the five stores previously specified by Grocery. Grocery wants to reject the 15-case delivery and cancel the contract with Cereal. Analyze the gap filing provisions of UCC Article 2 as they pertain to the terms of this contract. What rights or defenses, if any, does Cereal, Inc. have under contract law? Analyze the remedies available to Grocery, Inc. and Cereal, Inc. Explain all answers in detail.
Cereal has two major defenses. The contract did not specify types of cereals and this gives Cereals right to vary offered cereal types. Similarly, the contract did not specify delivery points and this negates Cereals’ obligation to deliver at the specified locations. Grocery can however contract outside the contract to fill the gap that Cereals’ shortage would create, as long as Cereals suffers shortage (Cross and Miller, 2011).
5. Tom is the produce manager at Grocery, Inc. He has a model train set that is quite extensive and valuable. When Tom was visiting Harry one day, he told Harry that when he retired in two years he wanted to sell his train set and travel on real trains. Tom also told Harry, also a model train enthusiast, that Harry was the only person he planned to sell his train set to. Harry said he looked forward to having Toms trains. Harry then spent the next two years and most of his savings on a 2,000 sq. ft addition to his house to make room for the train set. When Harry told Tom that he was building the addition for the train set, Tom just smiled. Tom also heard that Harry had borrowed money from his aunt to help with the expense. When Tom retired, he sold his train set to David. Harry then sued Tom for breach of contract or, in the alternative, promissory estoppel. Who wins? Explain your answer.
Harry wins the case because UCC overrides common law provisions for contract laws and UCC provides for contract validity despite indefiniteness of an agreement. A basis therefore exists for a contract and grants application of promissory estoppels (Cross and Miller, 2011).
6. Jason shipped a truck load of peaches from his orchard to Grocery Inc. using an independent trucker. The truck broke down and the shipment was delayed three days. The peaches were spoiled on arrival. Who bears the risk? Explain your answer.
The independent trucker bears the risk because as an independent contractor, he assumes all involved risks in his operations (Cross and Miller, 2011).
7. Supplier Inc. is a large wholesaler that has a contract with Grocery, Inc. Supplier sued Grocery when Grocery failed to place an order by a specific date, as required by the contract. Each order was to be worth at least $550. Grocery argued that its employee Bill had signed a standard pre-printed supply contract that did not state specifics regarding time of order and quantity. Bill had the authority to sign a standard pre-printed supply contract but could not authorize specific terms. This limitation on Bills authority was unknown to Supplier. Supplier argued that the terms were “boilerplate” and therefore could be modified by acceptance. Supplier offered oral testimony at trial to prove that Bill had agreed to the modifications. Is there a contract? If so, what are the terms? Explain your answers. Also, discuss the use of Supplier, Inc.’s oral testimony at trial.
A contract exists under output contract of the UCC. Even though Bill had no authority over such a contract, his negligence remains his liability and that of his employers, Groceries. The oral testimony is admissible, because UCC guidelines only restrict validity of contracts beyond stipulated quantities but provides for admissibility of any other form of oral evidence, and is therefore the evidence, particularly after its presentation in a trial (Cross and Miller, 2011).
Cross, F. and Miller, R. (2011). The legal environment of business: Text and cases: Ethical, regulatory, global, and corporate issues. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.
Source: adapted from Univ. of Phoenix, LAW/421, Case Scenarios: Grocery, Inc. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Law Questions Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Law Questions Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words. Retrieved from
(Law Questions Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
Law Questions Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words.
“Law Questions Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Law questions

...? Assignment Law Order Issue Whether Barkley can enter into Contractual Obligations on his own Barkley is the son of Knarles and he is aged 17. When the father had gone for the Green Facilties Management Trade Show, Barkley was responsible for handling the issues of the firm. The question which arises here is whether Barkley is legally tenable to enter into contracts on behalf of the firm. One of the most fundamental principles of Contract Law is that an individual who is below the age of 18 cannot enter into contracts with other parties. This law also applies to situations which consist of an individual entering into contracts to represent a firm which has been established under law. Applying the law to the facts, we understand... the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Public law questions

... a. The Act was enacted so as introduce new provisions in respect of persons who lack capa in respect of making particular decisions and maximizing their ability so as to make decisions as well as participation in respect of decision making. Further, a superior court of record known as the Court of Protection established instead of the office of Supreme Court. In addition provisions which are in connection with the Convention on the International Protection of Adults which had been signed at the Hague on 13th January 2000. The Act provides for specific proviso which would allow people to plan ahead in respect of a situation where they might need support. Further, there are provisions which deal with problems that people may have... a. The Act ...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Law Questions

...Task The key element in proving material support to terrorism is mens rea. The intention of knowingly providing financial or any other form of material support to a terrorist organization has to be sustained by the prosecution in a charge of providing material support to a terrorist organization (Abram Normans, 2002, p.6). These involves the advancement of evidence that the accused, at the time of committing the offence, knew that he/she was providing material support to a terrorist organization and knew the terrorist organization in question. 2 Terrorism has been defined by different kinds of laws including the following: 1. The International Terrorism Act of 1990 2. The Patriots Act 3. The UN...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Business Law - Questions

...?Business Law - Business Law According to the UK court of law, a contract is an agreement between two or more individuals, parties or groups and that agreement is enforceable by the court of law. In the UK, a contract is considered valid if it contains the following elements: offer, acceptance, consideration, intention and certainty (Miller, 2013, p.145). Offer is referred to certain conditions that the person making the offer is ready to accept, this offer is made to another individual, the individual receiving the offer is recognized as offeree and the first step of getting into a contract is completed if the offeree accepts the terms and conditions of the offer. When...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Business Law - Questions

...?Business Law Element of Contract to UK Online Selling: In order to sell a product to s through online medium, the websites offering the goods or services needs to have an explicit contract, verifiable by the consumers with a specific log, where they can express their agreement to such a contract by endorsing a tick mark thereon. Such a contract or agreement of terms of use is enforceable by law and valid for all the online transactions. It is not necessary for the sales of goods or services in this manner, to have a traditional, written document by endorsing signature in ink for it to be legally valid. Mostly in the case of online business, an advertisement on a site suffices as “a formal offer to...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Business Law Questions

...? Business Law Questions Number Question1: “Basic agency law principle can be used by a good plaintiff’slawyer to achieve comparable results to ‘alter ego’ judicial theories in most ‘pcv” situations.” Critically discuss and evaluate this statement. The law of agency can be construed by a sharp attorney representing a plaintiff to support a transfer the ownership of a property in question to the agent in a similar way as alter ego theories. Basically, the agency law in PCV situations involves an array of agreements that bring together the agent, and the principal in which case the former becomes mandated under the law to...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Business Law Questions

...?First information Business Law Question Eva, the owner of Finest Enterprises, is a sole proprietor. Assuch, she runs and maintains ownership of the business herself. In sole proprietorship, there is no legal distinction between Eva and Finest Enterprises that is, the owner and the business are considered as one under law (Aronoff, Ward and Astrachan 22). The first advantage is that this type of business is easy to form. The business organization is simple with minimal legal formalities that includes the license and permits in special cases. The business is also easy to dissolve if Eva so wishes. The second advantage is that this type of business only needs small startup capital. Apart...
7 Pages(1750 words)Coursework

Hypothetical international law questions

...1. Set forth at least one jurisdictional theory under which each of the three nations may properly prosecute the terrorists under international law. Answer. There are several international conventions against unlawful interference with civil aviation. Among them the following are most important : 1. Tokyo Convention(1963) 2. Hague Convention (1970) 3. Montreal Convention(1971) 4. Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Act of Violence at Airports Serving International Civil Aviation, 1988 Principle of universal jurisdiction in respect of the crime of the hijacking : The principle of universal jurisdiction is recognized in respect of the crime of piracy and war crimes. Since hijacking is generally described as aerial piracy... , the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Law Questions

...Law Questions Law questions Q1. The issue is that the people officers were called to respond to an accident and not an investigation into Fred’s life. Did the circumstances and facts provide the police officers a probable or credible cause to consider that Fred had or was going to commit a felony? Can probable cause rely on tips? In addition, the police officers did not have the right to search Fred’s possession because they lacked a valid search warrant from the court. . The “Due Process Clause” had been disobeyed when police officers coerced Fred to take breadth test. The police officers in this matter are supposed to respond to the accident not start searching Fred’s...
5 Pages(1250 words)Assignment

Business law questions

... Section/# Law Question and Answers 11. With regards to Young bringing suit against Pileggi for nonpayment, it is not a valid defense for Pileggi due to the fact that the promissory note that discussed the amount given is not sufficient to distance Young from the wrong doing that he may have committed in the first place. Simply agreeing to pay is of course not sufficient in order to undue any past wrongdoing. One can understand this by a situation in which an individual would steal something from their employer only to go to the employer at a later time and say that they will pay it back. The employee would still be ultimately responsible for the theft that they committed regardless of the extenuating circumstances of the case... place. ...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Law Questions for FREE!

Contact Us