Criminal Procedure Issues - Essay Example

On the contrary, the commentators appeared to have criticized Justice Antonin Scalia stating him to be highly concentrative on the understandable meaning of the constitutional laws. The commentators elaborated on the necessity of the textualist towards understanding the situation depending on how he/she should be interpreting the constitutional laws. To the second commentator, the textualization of constitutional law can either be projected as a narrowed-down aspect or a broadened principle. Thus, the second comment implies the alignment of the commentator with the statements made by the first commentator.

The second commentator left a vagueness within the understanding of the situation as per which the narrowing or the broadening of the contextual textualization should take place. Irrespective of all these, the third commenter presented his views on the two types of textualists, i.e. ‘semantic-originalists’ and ‘expectation-originalists’ that take specific consideration of the law writer’s intention in terms of imparting a specific meaning of the constitution that appears to be misaligned with the facts mentioned by Justice Antonin Scalia. Justice Antonin Scalia also proved the fourth comment regarding the attainment of associated meaning from the constitutional interpretation as vague by stating that the legislation only possesses the authority of structuring the rules and it should remain confined to a specific meaning.

The alternative mentioned by Justice Antonin Scalia in terms of interpreting constitutional laws can be considered effective in recommending appropriate legal texts. The facts mentioned within the book have also been observed to be laying a significant amount of focus on the development and introduction of a new ‘meta framework’ that can be considered effective enough in terms of projecting an appropriate meaning of the constitutional laws rather than just concentrating on the vagueness of the historical interpretive patterns.

Some of the comments made by the commentators can be considered applicable under specific scenarios, but certain conditions should be abided upon regarding constitutional misinterpretation and the formation of associated judgmental laws. Thus, the analysis also provides suggestions based on which improvements can be made to the US Constitution.