Nobody downloaded yet

Brief - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The claim is due to the anterior cervical fusion done on Hene Perin, the plaintiff, by Robert Hayne, the defendant. The fusion exercise was medically successful; but the plaintiff…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.4% of users find it useful
Brief
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Brief"

Download file to see previous pages The plaintiff argued that the defendant negligently injured the recurrent laryngeal nerve. However, the defendant claimed that the laryngeal was not severed. The rule of identifying negligence in this case is through expert opinion. The doctors argued that the method used by the plaintiff was appropriate. The trial court directed verdict on the defendant on specific negligence issue.
The plaintiff illustrated the applicability of res ipsa loqoitur doctrine. The defendant claimed that the second foundation fact involving res ipsa loqoitur is absent due to the fact that it doesn’t lie in laymen’s common knowledge. This is in reference to injury occurring during cervical fusion surgery, because of inadequate care. The trial court refused to submit it; there wasn’t basis for the application of res ipsa loqoitur.
The defendant claimed that there was adequate evidence on the issue of trespass or battery. She alleges that four vertebrae were fused, together with the defendant’s assurances and inability to warn her on related hazards. However, the defendant claimed that the defendant was given adequate advice on her health problem and the scope of the corrective surgery. The trial court found out that the trespass theory in this case is inadequate to the applicability to the surgery in which the patient did not consent.
The trial court maintained the motion of the defendant for directed verdict. The trial court held that there was insufficient evidence to defend jury consideration of the case based on the four pleaded theories.
Will the defendant continue the treatment of the patient, given that other medical services providers have refused to accept plaintiff as their patient? Is the refusal by hospitals like Herrick and Alta Bates to offer medical services to the patient amount to refusal to offer emergency medical services?
A medical practitioner, who has provided the patient with adequate notice of termination, is not obliged to ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Brief Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1652090-brief
(Brief Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1652090-brief.
“Brief Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1652090-brief.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Let us find you another Assignment on topic Brief for FREE!
logo footer
Contact us:
+16312120006
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • StudentShare App Store
  • StudentShare Google play
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • Miscellaneous
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us