Analysis of Boiler Room Feature Film - Essay Example

This does not make sense because first of all, this is a brokerage firm, but one of the senior managers tells its employees that they do not hire brokers, but train them to become millionaires. In addition, its common knowledge that every manager will always try to show recruits, the company’s laid-down rules. Therefore, the activities that the company; is involved with are ethically questionable. The moral philosophy by which the parties seemed to have relied on to justify their actions is mala prohibita.

This moral philosophy describes acts that are not morally wrong, but the law prohibits them (Mara and Roberts 108). The parties in the movie relied upon this philosophy to justify their actions by getting involved in dubious stock exchanges to get rich quickly. This is because when they are caught, the law enforcers will not be able to find any evidence against them unless they do a much more thorough investigation. In addition to that, the constitution is also not very clear on what penalties someone found committing mala prohibita should be given (Mara and Roberts 109).

The two alternative philosophies which could have led the parties to different results are mala in se and misdemeanor. Mala in se can be defined as those acts which are immoral and very wrong for killing someone. Misdemeanors, on the other hand, can be said to be those crimes that are not very serious and therefore attract fewer penalties (Mara and Roberts 110). In case the parties had used mala in se philosophy for example through robbing banks, then definitely they could have been jailed for a lifetime.

However, in case they could have decided to follow the misdemeanor, then the parties could have been jailed and this, therefore, means that they could have lost all the money they had earned (Mara and Roberts 111). In conclusion, all three moral philosophies are illegal according to the law. Therefore anyone who is found to be engaging in them should be prosecuted.