The Reasons to Address the Court - Case Study Example

Legal Issue(s) Presented before Court: The legal issues associated with the case include the issue whether the contract required the removal of asbestos residue in pores and cracks, whether TEG was required to follow the contract specifications rather than its work plan, and whether TEG was entitled to compensation for removing what it alleged were excessive quantities of asbestos. The concept of breach of contract was a vital issue associated with these issues.Holding of the Court: As to the decision of the Court of Federal Claims, granting summary judgment in favour of the government on TEG’s claims for breach of contract was initiated.

Court’s Rationale or Reasoning for its Decision: The court adheres to the presumption that any ‘debris and residues’ contains asbestos. The court also made the case clear by going back to the basic law concerning the contract, and its interpretation.B.Case name and citation: BLINDERMAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., Appellant, v. THE UNITED STATES, Appellee.Key Facts: There was a presence of contract between the two parties involved in the case. There was a Board’s decision made.

For this matter at hand, the cross-motions for summary judgment on the contractor’s appeal from the Board’s decision were thereafter filed in the United States Court of Claims.Legal Issue(s) Presented before Court: There were three essential issues raised in this case, which include the power outage claim, the claim for delays in obtaining access to the apartments, and the contractor’s right to recover damages.Holding of the Court: The Board’s decision involving the power outage of August 18, 1978, was affirmed.

Access claim, however, was reversed and both motions for summary judgment were denied, allowing the case to be remanded to the Board. Court’s Rationale or Reasoning for its Decision: Finding for sufficient findings of fact and conclusions will be necessary.