StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Duties to Provide a Seaworthy Ship - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "The Duties to Provide a Seaworthy Ship" suggests that the document serves several functions in international trade. It is issued by a haulier and entails a consignment of merchandise, gives identity to the goods, and urges the transporter to deliver the goods to the right party…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.1% of users find it useful
The Duties to Provide a Seaworthy Ship
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Duties to Provide a Seaworthy Ship"

Rights and Duties of the Ship-owner Rights and Duties of the Ship-owner Introduction A bill of lading (BOL) refers to a document used in the movement of goods by sea. The document serves several functions in international trade. It is issued by a hauler and entails a consignment of merchandise, gives identify to the goods, and urges the transporter to deliver the goods to the right party. The bill of lading came forward with the development of international trade in the medieval world (Al Tamimi & Company, n.d). International traders needed a way of recognising what had been loaded onto the vessels, and started to give signed receipts to confirm the loading of their merchandise on to the ships and to confirm the state of the merchandise at the time of loading. With the development of mercantilism, these bills started to be used as the label to the products, and the bill of lading was developed in much the same form as we recognise today (Wilson, 2010). The up to date rules on bills of lading were codified by the Hague Statue in 1924. Ship-owners have had and still have huge obligations with regard to this bill (Al Tamimi & Company, n.d). In order to ensure that the goods people are protected when in voyage, the bill of lading set certain rights and duties of ship-owners that should be followed. This paper will critically assess the rights and duties of ship-owners under this bill. When merchandise is transported under the bill of lading, the rights and duties of a ship-owner are recognised by fast clauses in the deed (Australian Government n.d). These are known as "express obligations". The text can also include a Paramount clause confirming that the ship-owner is subject to legislation, for instance, the United Kingdom Carriage of Goods by the Sea Act of 1971 and/or the U.S. Carriage of Goods by the Sea Act of 1936, which impose The Hague-Visby Regulations of 1968 and The Hague Regulations of 1924 respectively. In any scenario, the bill of lading itself might not be liable to legislation, but be affirmed to be liable to The Hague-Visby Regulations and/or The Hague Regulations (Wilson, 2010). The Hamburg Regulations of 1978 are not applicable to the 1991 regulations, but there is nothing to stop a nation, which has accepted these, from passing legislation requiring carriage to and/or from that nation and under bills of lading to be liable to the Hamburg Rules. The duties and responsibilities of ship-owners were put into effect internationally on November 1st, 1992. Various obligations of the ship-owner under these rules are understandable and need not be considered in any depth, for instance the duty to sign, print and issue bills of lading (Carr & Kidner, 2009). The giving of bills of lading is enclosed by the rules and will be critically discussed. The rights and duties of the ship-owners will be assessed, taking the Hague Rules as a preliminary model and too much weight will be laid on multifaceted legal issues (Ship Inspection, n.d). A contrast will be attempted between the rights and duties specified in the three sets of global rules. The central reason for this manner of treatment is that ship-owners (and holders of bills of lading) might wish to know their rights and duties under the rules applied by diverse legislations in the different countries in which the vessels might call. It is vital to note primarily that the ship-owners rights and duties are the Charterers’ Rights (Ship Inspection, n.d). The diverse rights and duties of the ship-owners can be summed up as follows: to grant a seaworthy ship that complies with the bills of lading; carefully and properly to handle, load, stow, keep, carry, care for, deliver and discharge the cargo; to abide by the bill’s lawful employment instructions; to take legal action on voyages with logical dispatch. The Duty to Provide a Seaworthy Ship: A majority of contracts of carriage “particularly bills of lading” state expressly that the ship ought to be seaworthy (Chuah, 2009). For example, clause 1 of ASBATANKVOY states that a ship should be seaworthy, having all pumps, pipes and heater coils in proper working conditions and being, in every respect, suited for the voyage. In spite of that, other clauses in the bills of lading might not talk about the seaworthiness explicitly but have a similar effect (Carr & Kidner, 2009). For instance, clause 2.1 of BPTIME confirms that, during delivery, the ship shall be staunch, tight and sturdy and, in every manner, fit for its service. Even though, an express seaworthiness clause is not present, the duty to provide a seaworthy ship is, nonetheless, implied at law. It was stated in Kopitoff v Wilson, [(1876) 1 QBD 602 ] that a ship-owner is, in relation to the contract, necessarily and impliedly held to guarantee that the ship is well and is, in a state, to carry out its duties, or, in everyday language, is seaworthy. This means that the ship-owner, under the bill of lading, should make sure that the ship is fit to meet and experience the perils of the sea, as well as other subsidiary risks, to which it will essentially be exposed in the course of the expedition (Todd, 2002). The bill of lading believes that the ship-owner is obliged to put the ship in question at the disposal of the charterer at the place and time agreed in a seaworthy state and appropriately equipped in such a condition as to accomplish the voyage or voyages stated in the charter-party. Also, the ship-owner must maintain the vessel in such a state all through the voyage or voyages in agreement with the charterparty (Dockray, 2004). In addition, Article 245 Section 3 of the bill of lading titled Time Charter, as well as Article 253 section 4, titled Bareboat Charter of the same bill, provides a similar wording of the abovementioned article. Nevertheless, the same responsibility to provide a seaworthy ship was lessened for the ship-owner, simply to offer a seaworthy ship prior to and at the start of each and every journey, as per Article 272 (1) of the said bill which stated that: 1. A ship-owner must, prior to setting sail and upon the start of a trip, use the essential care to put the ship in a seaworthy state, as well as to fit it out, and man it properly (Carr & Kidner, 2009). The ship-owner should prepare the cold rooms, as well as the holds, and other parts of the ship to receive, preserve and ferry the goods (Chuah, 2009). It is vital, after this, to ask ourselves what is seaworthiness. It was affirmed by Channell J in Blue Star Line v McFadden, [(1905) 1 KB 697] that a ship or any water vessel should have a level of fitness, which a normal, prudent and cautious owner would want his ship to have at the start of its voyage having regard to every probable circumstances of it…Would a cautious holder have required that it (i.e. the imperfection) should be made good prior to sending his vessel to the deep, had he acknowledged of it? If he would, then the vessel was not seaworthy. Accordingly, the necessary normal of seaworthiness relies not just upon physical fitness, but also to the age and nature of the ship, the manner of voyage envisaged, the type of the carried cargo, as well as all other comparative conditions (Todd, 2002). It is worth remembering that the following examples would lead to unseaworthiness breach of duty; An unskilled crew A team which is inadequately instructed or inadequate in numbers Outdated charts Inadequate bunkers for the journey (relies on the form of charterparty). Goods which affects the wellbeing of the vessel. Poor systems on board or ashore. The lack of documents needed by law (including local law) for the reasonable examination of the contemplated journey for instance a deratting permit. ISPS or SMS certificates are prone to be treated in a similar manner, but certificates, which are not essential, (for instance ITF Blue Cards) might not render the ship unseaworthy [The Derby (1985) 2 Ll. Rep 325]. It is also vital to consider what uncargoworthiness is in order to understand the duties and rights of ship-owners under this law (Carr & Kidner, 2009). Cargoworthiness is classified under the seaworthiness necessities of the bill of lading. The ship-owner must ensure that the vessel is, in every manner, practically fit to carry and receive the contemplated freight so as to be regarded as a seaworthy ship (Todd, 2002). It was affirmed in The Good Friend [(1984) 2 Ll. Rep 586] that the vessel would be regarded as uncargoworthy because of the presence on board of other cargoes that might affect the latent cargo, as well. A similar notion was set impliedly under Art II of The Hague Rules, as well as The Hague-Visby Rules, which states that it shall not be permitted for the ship-owner to pack the ship or any part thereof which is chartered merchandise that are not the charterers devoid of the charterers approval. If not, the shipment for the goods loaded without approval shall be passed to the charterer who shall also have the lawful right to declare reimbursement for damages if suitable (Chuah, 2009). Pertaining to the terms of Article VI, under each contract of the voyage of goods by sea, the ship-owner, in relation to the handling, loading, carriage, custody, storage, care and release of such goods, shall be liable to the liabilities and responsibilities and unrestricted to the rights and protections hereinafter set forth. The carriage of merchandise is the period from when the goods are packed to the instant they are released from the vessel (Carr & Kidner, 2009). Hence, the responsibilities start when supplies are loaded to the time they are released, i.e., this most likely takes in the actual discharging and loading operation (Ship Inspection, n.d). Article VI of the bill of lading states that the ship-owner can enter into any agreement given that the terms and conditions are contained in the receipt that is an invariable document marked and no bill of lading are issued as such. Such agreements are "waybills". Article VI of the bill of lading does not pertain to normal commercial shipments made in the normal course of trade, but to merchandise which need to be carried under a special accord. Article VII allows a ship-owner to agree to liability and responsibility related to the merchandise prior to loading on and after releasing from the ship (Carr & Kidner, 2009). While the bill of lading identifies the application of the regulations they do not include a general and far-reaching statement that covers the gist and scope of the rules (Bennett, 2006). These regulations do make universal statements concerning responsibilities and liabilities, such as that the duty of the ship-owner of the goods covers the transit period. This is a statement of the length of the liability, but nothing is said as to what exact activities or duties are incorporated in the "responsibility" (Bennett, 2006). The bill of lading also relates responsibility more to accountability where, in Art. 5, the grounds of accountability are specified and it is affirmed that the accountability will not be that of the ship-owner if he can demonstrate "that he, his agents or servants took all actions that could practically be required to evade" the damage, delay or loss. This means that the ship-owner or his agents or servants should take sound measures to avoid loss, damage, as well as delay. This is as close to specific accountability of the ship-owner and approximates the responsibility under The Hague-Visby Rules/Hague Rules for the ship-owner to exercise due diligence (Carr & Kidner, 2009). It is also vital to look into the security plans that the bill of lading advises ship-owners to undertake. Ship security plans must include the following: A safety assessment for the vessel The safety measures or activities to be applied at each security level Contact information for the vessel’s security officer Conditions for declarations of security How the plan will contribute to sea security outcomes A declaration of the authority of the owner of the ship Ship-owners should ensure that ship safety plans are in writing and accompanied by appropriate supporting credentials as approved in the bill of lading (Australian Government, n.d). The ship-owner also has duty under the bill of lading to make sure that the security plan for the vessel is protected against unauthorised amendment, access and disclosure. The bill also has regulations covering the variation, approval and cancellation, and revision of ship safety plans. The bill might direct variants of ship safety plans if there is an alteration in offshore facility security or maritime transport (Australian Government, n.d). A ship-owner should ensure that a safety plan used for international voyages includes measures for giving pre-entry information (Bennett, 2006). Pre-entry information contains, among other matters, particulars of the ships global Ship Security Certificate, the vessel’s marine security level, as well as the last 10 ports of call. Ship safety plans should also tackle a wide range of other prescribed procedures and measures, which are intended to stop, or respond to, breaches of security or threats against the vessel operator covered by the plan. Security plans should include details of safety equipment on the ship and measures for testing and protection of this equipment (Australian Government, n.d). Ship-owners should also ensure that security plans address obligations concerning ship security proceedings, as well as provide information on how the measures will be reviewed, when and how it will be audited and who will assist in the auditing. Conclusion Responsibility for making sure that a ship is built and designed in a way that does not expose both goods and crew to improper risks rest within the ship-owner. The layout and construction of the ship should be appropriate for its planned purposes once operational. This necessitates attention to vital details of construction and design, which affect sanitation on vessel. This paper made references to design concerns and noted the urge to ensure acquiescence with design standards, which support liable ship operations. Examples comprised the need to ensure that safety measures are guaranteed and that the ship is in proper condition. Ship-owners should take note of this and ensure that their vessels are in the best conditions to grant proper services. References Al Tamimi & Company n.d, A shipowners duty to provide a seaworthy ship under the charterparty, viewed March 15, 2013, http://www.tamimi.com/en/publication/publications/section-3/september/a-shipowners-duty-to-provide-a-seaworthy-ship-under-the-charterparty.html Australian Government n.d, Ship ownersand operatorsresponsibilities and obligations, viewed March 14, 2013, http://www.infrastructure.gov.au/transport/security/maritime/security_plans/ship_owners.aspx Bennett, H 2006, Law of marine insurance, Oxford University Press, New York. Carr, I & Kidner, R 2009, International Trade Law Statutes and Conventions 2009/2010 4th ed, Cavendish, Singapore. Chuah, J 2009, Law of international trade: Cross border commercial transactions 4th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, London. Dockray, M 2004, Cases and materials on the carriage of goods by sea 3rd ed, Cavendish, Singapore. Ship Inspection n.d, Maritime guide, viewed March 13, 2013, http://www.shipinspection.eu/index.php?action=page_display&PageID=246 Ship Inspection n.d, Maritime guide, viewed March 14, 2013, http://www.shipinspection.eu/index.php?action=page_display&PageID=124 Todd, P 2002, Cases and materials on international trade law, Sweet and Maxwell, London. Wilson, J 2010, Carriage of goods by sea 7th ed, Longman, London. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Critically assess the rights and duties of the shipowner under a bill Essay”, n.d.)
Critically assess the rights and duties of the shipowner under a bill Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1617108-critically-assess-the-rights-and-duties-of-the-shipowner-under-a-bill-of-lading
(Critically Assess the Rights and Duties of the Shipowner under a Bill Essay)
Critically Assess the Rights and Duties of the Shipowner under a Bill Essay. https://studentshare.org/law/1617108-critically-assess-the-rights-and-duties-of-the-shipowner-under-a-bill-of-lading.
“Critically Assess the Rights and Duties of the Shipowner under a Bill Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1617108-critically-assess-the-rights-and-duties-of-the-shipowner-under-a-bill-of-lading.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Duties to Provide a Seaworthy Ship

International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea 1972

Among the cardinal duty of the ship or vessel owner is to provide a seaworthy ship or vessel.... Under the general rules of the Maritime law, a ship or the vessel owner is responsible for providing a sea worthy vessel.... In this sense, the ship or the vessel owner is required to exercise due diligence, through ensuring that the vessel or the ship the owner is releasing to the sea is well manned, equipped and supplied, to ensure that the ship or the vessel remains seaworthy for the whole duration that it is meant to be in the sea2....
5 Pages (1250 words) Coursework

Seaworthiness under Carriage of Goods by Sea

Providing a Seaworthy Vessel The obligation to provide a seaworthy ship for the voyage is understood between all parties even when it is not explicitly agreed upon.... The ship owner or the carrier is the main player in this process as he has to co-ordinate with the shipper and the consignee.... However, the ship owner has many rights and duties under bill of lading.... In the entire process of shipment, the ship owner has certain obligations to the shipper and the consignee....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Hague and Visby Rules

The shipment was damaged in transit abroad the defendant's ship.... The charterers required that the ship be loaded to the draught which was permitted by the Panama Canal Company.... The ship's master permitted 43,000 tonnes of coal but failed to take into account the fact that the ship's bow had a tendency to lean when passing out of salt water into fresh water during its journey through the Panama Canal while transporting the coal....
18 Pages (4500 words) Essay

The Impact of the Hague-Visby Rules in Relation to Duties of a Carrier

Critically assess the impact of the Hague-Visby Rules in relation to duties of a carrier....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

A Vessel Being Unseaworthy

The vessel must have suitable and sufficient manpower, as well as adequate equipment to combat and survive the ordinary perils of the sea that could be encountered during the voyage, and that are deemed necessary for performing the services required of itUnder The Hague – Visby Rules, the shipowner is under a continuous obligation to exercise due diligence to provide a seaworthy vessel which includes providing of a competent crew, at the commencement of each voyage.... n general, The Hague – Visby Rules, entrusts the shipowner with an additional liability of exercising due diligence and care in providing a seaworthy ship which must 'have the degree of fitness which an ordinarily careful and prudent owner would require his vessel to have at the commencement of her voyage having regard to all the probable circumstances of it' (source: G....
6 Pages (1500 words) Report

Rights and Obligations of Ship Owner under the Bill Of Lading

The following essay explores the duties and rights of the shipowner under the bill of lading in details.... This research is being carried out to evaluate and present rights and obligations of shipowner under the bill of lading, nature of rights under the bill of lading, implied duties of ship owners, conditions under which deviation may be permitted and rights of ship owners.... From the above short overview, there are several duties imposed on the shipowner by the bill of lading....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Maritime Law: Nature and Advantages of Proceeding in Rem

That notwithstanding, it is important to also note that action in them can only be taken by the plaintiff who has obtained a statutory or maritime lien against the ship and proceedings can only be instituted where a vessel is within/present in the jurisdiction of the state the proceedings are taking place (Bluesteinlawoffice.... Thirdly, proceedings in rem allow a claimant to arrest a ship and continue with proceedings as in personam (Okoli, 2010)....
11 Pages (2750 words) Coursework

The Main Provisions of the Hague-Visby Rules

Finally, the paper has explained a carrier's duties to provide a ship that is seaworthy, to do proper loading, to provide a bill of lading when the shipper demands for one and to properly supply, equip and operate the ship.... he responsibility to provide a ship that is seaworthy.... he responsibility to provide a bill of lading when the shipper demands one: bill of lading refers to the declaration by the carrier that the cargo has been received in good quality and quantity....
11 Pages (2750 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us