Should the Woman's in-Court Identification Be Allowed as Evidence - Essay Example

The woman who is the key witness in this case after being attacked had seen the robber and hence positively identified him during the line-up. If the case was being tried in the United States Courts, the law to be used to prove that the woman’s in-court identification of the man who robbed her would be tried under the Federal Rules of Evidence as provided by the federal government.

If elsewhere, then the Evidence Act would be applicable, but whichever law is used, the conclusion remains that the woman’s in-court identification should be allowed as evidence. The other reason for allowing the in-court identification is that the woman had personally seen the robber and reported and hence her testimony as a witness and identification cannot qualify to be termed as hearsay according to article VIII of the Federal rules of evidence.