Fourth Amendment forbids only unreasonable searches and seizures - Essay Example

A Law Scenario Did the consent to search the car ize opening the brown paper bag? Explain. Yes, the consent to search the car authorizes opening the brown paper bag so that there would be enough evidence to accuse the suspect. In this scenario, the search could be justified as a meaningful act to acquire adequate evidence to arrest the suspect. The officer had the right to search and open anything in the car since he probably believed that the suspect was transporting narcotics attributed by what he overheard from the public telephone that appeared as arrangements for drug transactions.

However, this does not give the police officer the power to arrest the suspect since there are no adequate justifications of the suspect transporting narcotics. Should the evidence be permitted for use against the defendant? The ultimate reason for the Officer searching the container in the car is to gather adequate evidence that prove the suspect illicit act. This stands out that, any evidence established would be worth to use against the defendant, and for further investigations of illegitimate act.

In this case, the fourth amendment regards that, when under such circumstances, it is objectively sound for the officer to consider that the scope of the suspect’s approval authorized him to open the container in the Automobile (Legal professionals, 2012). In fact, it would be reasonable for the suspect to permit the Officer to open the container despite being guilt of the offence. Thus, I must conclude that, the evidences should be permitted against the defendant, and arrested if found guilt after carrying out comprehensive investigations.

For instance, having seen a paper bag with cocaine clearly shows that the suspect appeared to be involved in a drug transaction. ReferenceLegal professionals. (2012). Cases and codes. Retrieved from: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=500&invol=248