Juvenile Justice - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
About a century ago, the United States Juvenile Justice System was created with the objective of redirecting young delinquents from the harsh sentences of criminal courts and promoting rehabilitation/ treatment according to the needs of the juvenile. The system was to…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.8% of users find it useful
Juvenile Justice
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Juvenile Justice"

The United s Juvenile Justice System About a century ago, the United s Juvenile Justice System wascreated with the objective of redirecting young delinquents from the harsh sentences of criminal courts and promoting rehabilitation/ treatment according to the needs of the juvenile. The system was to concentrate on the best interests of the child rather than on the felony committed. Differently treated from adult offenders, juveniles are not accused of crimes but with misbehaviors; they are considered innocent and adjudicated offenders; they do not go to prison but to a reformatory or rehabilitation center. Juvenile court proceedings were not open to the public and were left to the discretion of the juvenile court judge. Records were confidential to protect the juvenile’s privacy and promote his/her chances for rehabilitation, reuniting with family and rejoining into society. Because of some tensions, such as concentration on the juvenile’s welfare against concentration on his/her incapacities, deserved punishment, and the protection of society from the juvenile’s misdemeanors; different juvenile justice systems were established in every state and jurisdiction (McCord, Widom & Crowell 154). All systems of the states of California, North Dakota and South Carolina have the same goal: the treatment and rehabilitation of young delinquents. Shown in this paper are similar or different ways of addressing juvenile crimes in these states.
In California, juveniles age 17-24 years old are detained for infringements of court orders; evasion from obligation; if the juvenile has a possibility to escape; for the protection of the juvenile or society; and if the juvenile is incriminated in certain felonies. As a disposition or as a sanction for breach of trial, aside from holding young offenders in protected detention before juvenile court judgment, sentencing, disposition and consignment, a court may take a delinquent to a juvenile hall, foster care or group care; or released to parents for home confinement. In North Dakota, 17-20 year-old offenders are held in detention for his or society’s protection; if there is a possibility of escape or from being removed from court rule; in cases when the offender has no parent or guardian; or in cases when the juvenile court has issued a detention order. The state’s detention is given in 7 regional juvenile detention centers managed by the county or associations of various counties, or by the North Dakota Division of Juvenile Services provided at the Youth Correctional Center. Detention of juveniles in South Carolina is controlled by individually managed county detention centers or by the South Carolina Juvenile Detention Center. Delinquents accused of severe crimes or possession of deadly weapons and awaiting court judgment and disposition may be taken to a secure detention hall. However, a young offender cannot be held in detention while still awaiting assignment in a facility; cannot be sentenced to secure detention, and authorization for probation infringements. Detention through electronic monitoring, house arrest, and shelter placement are possible options for offenders in South Carolina (National Center for Juvenile Justice).
Depending on the age of the offender; the severity of the crime committed; the offender’s previous history; and the consistency and weights of evidence, probation intake officials and county district attorneys of all three states may redirect a case to diversion programs particularly for first-time, non-violent youth offenders. Such programs are law-related education, drug and alcohol programs, lectures on shoplifting cases, individual and family therapy, behavior-reform programs, healing forums and adolescent courts. In California, the duration of a youth’s maximum involvement in a diversion program is six months. In cases of non-participation in a required program within 60 days, a court petition may be filed. In North Dakota, the offender should confess to the accusation and both the juvenile and parents should permit and concur to the conduct and management decisions by the juvenile court officials. Juveniles may be diverted to Informal Adjustment probation up to nine months with an extension not exceeding 5 months on the provision of reasonable grounds. In the state of South Carolina, judicial courts grant juvenile arbitration, through solicitors offices using qualified volunteers as negotiators, allowing a non-court resolution of cases specifically for first-time, non-violent delinquents (National Center for Juvenile Justice).
Both the states of California and South Carolina commit their young delinquents to the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ), which sets the youth in an appropriate corrective setting decided by DJJs organization staff implementing a risk and needs evaluation. Juveniles in North Dakota are committed to the Division of Juvenile Services (DJS) which decides the level of care by weighing the mildest preventive standards, most suitable placement guaranteeing public safety. Placement options comprise parental home; relative or foster cares; foster care, group home or residential treatments; hospitalization, and the States only correctional facility, the Youth Correctional Center. Unlike in North Dakota, juveniles in California are not committed to the DJS. The South Carolina juvenile court, aside from its commitment to the DJJ, has authority over the probation disposition and juvenile placement in a local or private facility (National Center for Juvenile Justice).
Juvenile probation services in North Dakota are funded by the Supreme Court Administrator’s Office. Adjudicated juveniles can get formal probation up to a maximum of two years with orders and personal contacts with a court official. Probation services in California are mandated by the California’s Welfare and Institutions Code. The Chief Probation Officer duly assigned by the Board of Supervisors or the Presiding Judge for the Superior Court in California directs the probation department. Under oath, the staff probation officers exercise arrest powers and search and seizure commands. California probation officers should at least be high school graduates, whereas North Dakota officers should have at least a bachelors degree in criminal justice, social work or psychology/sociology. Probation court officers should attend the yearly training programs and should have a minimum of 40 hours of ongoing training every three years by the Supreme Court. Probation services in South Carolina are administered by the Department of Juvenile Justices (DJJ) Community Services Division. Probation officers not necessarily certified professionals by any South Carolina agency but with a minimum 62 hours of basic training and supplementary 68 hours of in-service training, should have a college degree in social science or related fields (National Center for Juvenile Justice).
Released offenders in all states of California, North Dakota, South Carolina and the rest of the United States should abide by standard parole rules, such as paying compensation; submission to searches and seizures; communication with parole agent; and not leaving the state without permission. The Division of Juvenile Justice or the Division of Juvenile Services has the authority to change release or parole dates, depending upon the juvenile’s completion of treatment goals/plans; behavior inside the detention facility; completion of rehabilitation service; and the safety of the community if released. Aftercare services are included in the California parole administration. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation handles juvenile aftercare in North Dakota. In South Carolina, the Intensive Supervision Initiative (ISI) which is derived from the Intensive Aftercare Program (IAP) Model provides aftercare services and probation supervision (National Center for Juvenile Justice).
Works Cited
McCord, Joan, Widom, Cathy Spatz and Nancy A. Crowell. Commission on Behavioral and
Social Sciences and Education. Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Justice. National Academies Press. 2001.
National Center for Juvenile Justice. California. State Juvenile Justice Profiles.
Pitts-burgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice. 2005. 13 March 2012.
National Center for Juvenile Justice. North Dakota. State Juvenile Justice Profiles.
Pitts-burgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice. 2011. 13 March 2012.
National Center for Juvenile Justice. South Carolina. State Juvenile Justice Profiles.
Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice. 2011. 13 March 2012.
Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Juvenile Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 10”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Juvenile Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 10)
“Juvenile Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 10”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Juvenile Justice

...?Juvenile Justice a) After taking this and viewing the movie (again), what impact did this film have on you? From the movie, I have watched about Freedom by Hillary, The theme is based on Juvenile Justice or delinquency. Juvenile delinquency is one of the things that has baffled many people in the world today as they do not understand the reasons as to why such a behavior still continuous. This has made many people to have different opinions concerning this issue therefore ending up in wrong decisions when it comes to matters pertaining to delinquency. Some say that delinquency comes because of peer while others on the other hand say it is some kind of...
9 Pages(2250 words)Coursework

Juvenile Justice

...?Your Full 9 April Juvenile Justice The use of prevention programs within communities has been an ongoing process to withhold juvenile tendencies toward dangerous crimes and drug abuse. There are programs being implemented in school like Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E) and sponsored programs such as gang resistance education and training (GREAT). Though these programs and programs like these are in place to prevent juvenile crimes and drug abuse, they continuously prove to be ineffective on a large percentage of youth. The inadequate results of prevention programs can be derived organizations lacking quality implementation for prevention programs and the absence of strong adult reinforcement at home. Failing to complete... ...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Juvenile Justice

...a urinalysis administered. Technologies like these assist in advancing the goal of reducing man hours spent both patrolling those juveniles on probation and the high expense associated with bi-weekly substance checks using a urinalysis alone. Another approach to technocorrections is the use of pharmacological approaches in the treatment of juveniles currently in correctional or noncorrectional probationary settings. According to Tony Fabelo with the National Institute of Justice, “Experiments are now being conducted with drugs that affect the levels of brain neurotransmitters and can be used to help treat drug abuse.” (Fabelo 2) The use of drugs as a method of reducing criminal behavior...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Juvenile Justice

...? The ten evidence-based principles and rehabilitative approaches are target criminogenic needs which simply means to target the factors leading to criminal behavior. Target thorough assessment of risk and need which means targeting specific risk behaviors and locating specific fixes for the individual needs as they are understood, another principle is; base design and implementation on a proven theoretical model or what programs work and why. Using cognitive-behavioral approaches, thinking and behavior are directly linked especially in juvenile offenders. Disruption of the delinquency network, by giving juveniles programs and opportunities outside of their normal routines they are able to avoid behaviors...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Juvenile Justice

...? Juvenile justice Introduction Juvenile justice is executed by a juvenile court. This court isa special tribunal having a distinct legal authority to bring to trial and pass judgments for crimes committed by children who are still in the age bracket of minority. The present legal systems treat crimes committed by the minors in a different way from the crime committed by those who have attained the age of majority. The main difference between the juvenile and adult court system is that, adult court system focuses on the avoidance and justice as the underlying principle for prosecuting offenders whereas the juvenile system is committed to rehabilitate delinquent youths into upstanding citizens with good morals (Tanenhaus 68). Eras... of...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Juvenile Justice

...?Juvenile Justice The positivist worldview explains that humans are shaped by their society and they are product of their environmental and cultural influences. Therefore, to a large extent individual actions are largely influenced by biological and environmental factors, and not out of free will. This would particularly hold much in juvenile justice system where children are active in reading and assimilate what they perceive in the society. To respond to Mrs. I, it would be best to note the best kind of juvenile justice system that may help her child, for example, early youth reforms schools mostly utilized corporal punishment, confinement, and other devices of humiliation as elements to ensure the youth is not only controlled... the harm...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Juvenile justice

...In 1993 the Criminal of United Kingdom changed. What was once known as the Juvenile Delinquents Act was over turned, and the Young Offenders Act(ACT OF 1993) took its place. The preceding Act was based on the notion that adolescent offenders were just miniature adults that were "slow" (Youth in Conflict with the Law, 2000) and could not form the intent (mens rea) to commit a crime. The Criminal Justice act of 1993 mainly revolved around incarceration for these perpetrators, and just recently the adolescent has come to be accepted as separate from adults. The Young Offenders Act basis is that young people do not have the mans rea or culpability to perform most criminal endeavors; that they may know about justice and their rights... , but their...
18 Pages(4500 words)Case Study

Juvenile Justice

...JUVENILE JUSTICE Treatment Programs for Juvenile Delinquents for the Most Effective Outcomes And Those Which Offer the Least Chance for Success Introduction The juvenile justice system is based on the concept that children are developmentally different from adults, hence juvenile delinquents are more receptive to treatment and rehabilitation than adult criminals. The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) recommends that children and youth who enter the juvenile justice system should be treated appropriately through every stage of the program, including “prevention, early intervention,...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Juvenile Justice

...Juvenile Justice Since America has an economy that is inclined to benefit the rich and not so much towards the masses, the element of juvenile delinquency does surely crop up for a number of reasons. This is because juvenile delinquency has existed for so long now and its repercussions are immensely significant to understand within the American economic domains. As the wealthier lot is becoming richer with each passing day, there has to be a fine line of distinction towards what can be seen as acceptable and what is simply deemed as inappropriate from the very basic levels. Income inequality within America has haunted the masses because it provides them more problems...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay


...truly believe and have faith that the justice system will consider the right course of action to take. Thank you for considering this request for leniency. Sincerely, Usher .W. Newton. Conclusion The juvenile violence sobering projections about the future underscore the need for immediate, strong, decisive and well-planned action to intervene earlier with prevention efforts on minor children from following in their elder siblings self-destructive footprints. It is imperative, at the same time that we effectively respond to that small percentage of juvenile offenders who account for the vast majority of delinquent acts and violence and who repeatedly victimize the community. To respond...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Juvenile Justice for FREE!

Contact Us